Competence, Compellability And Special Measures Flashcards
D’s cannot be compelled to testify in defence
S 1(1) CEA 1898
Inferences from failure to testify or answer any q
S 35 CJPOA 1994
Cowan direction:
Burden of proof remains on pros
D entitled to remain silent
Inference from failure to testify alone cannot prove guilt
Jury must first be satisfied pros had established case to answer
If jury conclude silence can only sensibly be attributed to D having no answer that would stand up to cross ex, may draw inference
Dixon
Entitled to draw adverse inferences under s 35 CJPOA despite D having low IQ and learning difficulties
Compellability of spouses
Common law: exception so not compellable (cohabitees are not spouses (Pearce))
PACE ss 80(2A)(b) and (3): where offence involves assault to family member or sexual offence of person under 16
Protective measures for vulnerable Ws
S 51 CJA 2003: live link
Ss 16-27, ss 29-33 YJCEA
Protection for child Ds
Ss 33A, 33B and 33BB
R v Davis
Cumulative effect of protective measure meant breach of art 6(3)(d) and departure from common law principles as meant D could not test Ws credibility
Witness anonymity measures
CJA 2009 ss 86-96
Starting point: all Ws competent
S 53(1) YJCEA 1999