Competence & Compellability Flashcards
What does Section 23(3) of the Evidence Act say?
23 Choice of oath or affirmation
(3) The court may direct a person who is to be a witness to make an affirmation if:
(a) the person refuses to choose whether to take an oath or make an affirmation, or
(b) it is not reasonably practicable for the person to take an appropriate oath.
What does Section 24(2)(a) of the Evidence Act say?
24 Requirements for oaths
(1) It is not necessary that a religious text be used in taking an oath.
(2) An oath is effective for the purposes of this Division even if the person who took it:
(a) did not have a religious belief or did not have a religious belief of a particular kind, or
(b) did not understand the nature and consequences of the oath.
What does Section 13(4) relate to?
Sworn and Unsworn evidence
13 Competence: lack of capacity
(4) A person who is not competent to give sworn evidence about a fact may, subject to subsection (5), be competent to give unsworn evidence about the fact.
What does Section 13(6) relate to?
It is presumed unless the contrary is proved (onus on the person asserting that witness is incompetent) that a person is NOT incompetent
The presumption that all persons are competent to give evidence (S12) places the onus on the party who asserts a person is incompetent to prove the fact on the BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES. What Section of the Evidence Act covers this particular standard of proof?
Section 142
142 Admissibility of evidence: standard of proof
(1) Except as otherwise provided by this Act, in any proceeding the court is to find that the facts necessary for deciding:
(a) a question whether evidence should be admitted or not admitted, whether in the exercise of a discretion or not, or
(b) any other question arising under this Act,
have been proved if it is satisfied that they have been proved on the balance of probabilities.
The question of fact of whether a witness is competent to give evidence is a preliminary question and that may be determined on a voir dire. What Section of the Evidence Act covers Voir Dires?
Section 189
189 The voir dire
(1) If the determination of a question whether:
(a) evidence should be admitted (whether in the exercise of a discretion or not), or
(b) evidence can be used against a person, or
(c) a witness is competent or compellable,
depends on the court finding that a particular fact exists, the question whether that fact exists is, for the purposes of this section, a preliminary question.
R v Brooks is an authority for?
Competency to give evidence. In this matter the Judge presumed that the child witness was incompetent to give sworn evidence (made no enquiry as to actual competence) so allowed the child to give unsworn evidence.
HELD: there was no evidence the witness was incompetent so the unsworn evidence provisions were unavailable and hence all the unsworn evidence given by the child were inadmissible.
Evidence needs to be adduced and a finding made of incompetence to give sworn evidence, to enable UNSWORN evidence provisions.
What is Regina v JTB an authority for?
Another case regarding capacity to give sworn/unsworn evidence.
In this case, an 8 year old victim gave evidence about sexual misconduct of Accused. Judge assumed child could not give sworn evidence so heard unsworn evidence. Accused was convicted and sentenced.
HELD: The Evidence was not given under oath or lawful alternative and so there was no evidence before the Court.
** There must be a positive enquiry to establish grounds for unsworn evidence**
What does Section 18 of the Evidence Act provide?
Section 18 provides an exception to the compellability of some family members (parents, spouses, de factos, children) as witnesses for the prosecution if they are called to give evidence against the defendant.
Section 19 of the Evidence Act states that Section 18 (witness may object to giving evidence against family member) in certain proceedings. What are those certain proceedings?
Section 18 does not apply to Offences against or referred to in the Children’s And Young Person’s (Care and Protection) Act (Sections 222; 223; 227; 228) and also Section 279 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Section 13(3) Bottom slide page 3
Section 13(3) A person who is competent to give evidence about a fact is not competent to give sworn evidence about the fact if the person does not have the capacity to understand that, in giving evidence, he or she is under an obligation to give truthful evidence.
- The distinction between sworn and unsworn evidence is that…
Under what Subsection of Section 18 would I find the test in relation to compellability to give evidence vs harm being done to a relationship?
Section 18(6)
(6) A person who makes an objection under this section to giving evidence or giving evidence of a communication must not be required to give the evidence if the court finds that:
(a) there is a likelihood that harm would or might be caused (whether directly or indirectly) to the person, or to the relationship between the person and the defendant, if the person gives the evidence, and
(b) the nature and extent of that harm outweighs the desirability of having the evidence given.
Evidence can be given in 2 ways: what are they?
Sworn and Unsworn
The Court may find a person not competent under Section 13(1), however what does Section 13(2) provide?
A person may be competent to give evidence of some facts but not others.
13(2) A person who, because of subsection (1), is not competent to give evidence about a fact may be competent to give evidence about other facts.
Section 13(1) of the Evidence Act relates to competence: ‘and that competence cannot be overcome’.. there is a “NOTE” under Section 13(1) - What does that note lead you to?
The note leads you to look at Sections 30 and 31 for examples of assistance that may be provided to enable witnesses to overcome disabilities. (ie: interpreters, deaf/mute witnesses).
What section of the Evidence Act covers competence and compellability?
Section 12 of the Evidence Act.
Except as otherwise provided by this Act:
(a) every person is competent to give evidence, and
(b) a person who is competent to give evidence about a fact is compellable to give that evidence.