Common Law - ABC Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

a fortiori

A

a fortiori

from stronger

An a fortiori argument is an “argument from a stronger reason”, meaning that, because one fact is true, a second (related and included) fact must also be true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a mensa et thoro

A

a mensa et thoro

from table and bed

Divorce a mensa et thoro indicates legal separation without legal divorce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a posteriori

A

a posteriori

from later

An argument derived after an event, having the knowledge about the event. Inductive reasoning from observations and experiments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

a priori

A

a priori

from earlier

An argument derived before an event, without needing to have the knowledge about the event. Deductive reasoning from general principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

a quo

A

a quo

from which

Regarding a court below in an appeal, either a court of first instance or an appellate court, known as the court a quo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ab extra

A

ab extra

from outside

Concerning a case, a person may have received some funding from a 3rd party. This funding may have been considered ab extra.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ab initio

A

ab initio

from the beginning

“Commonly used referring to the time a contract, statute, marriage, or deed become legal. e.g. The couple was covered ab initio by her health policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

absque hoc

A

absque hoc

without this

“Presenting the negative portion of a plea when pleading at common by way a special traverse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

actus reus

A

actus reus

guilty act

Part of what proves criminal liability (with mens rea)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ad coelum

A

ad coelum

to the sky

Abbreviated from Cuius est solum eius est usque ad coelum et ad infernos which translates to “[for] whoever owns [the] soil, [it] is his all the way [up] to Heaven and [down] to Hell.” The principle that the owner of a parcel of land also owns the air above and the ground below the parcel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ad colligenda bona

A

ad colligenda bona

to collect the goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ad hoc

A

ad hoc

for this

Generally signifies a solution designed for a specific problem or task, non-generalizable, and not intended to be able to be adapted to other purposes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ad hominem

A

ad hominem

at the person

Attacking an opponent’s character rather than answering his argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ad idem

A

ad idem

to the same thing

In agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ad infinitum

A

ad infinitum

to infinity

To continue forever.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ad litem

A

ad litem

for the case

Describes those designated to represent parties deemed incapable of representing themselves, such as a child or incapacitated adult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ad quod damnum

A

ad quod damnum

according to the harm

Used in tort law. Implies that the reward or penalty ought to correspond to the damage suffered or inflicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

ad valorem

A

ad valorem

according to value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

adjournment sine die

A

adjournment sine die

adjournment without a day

When an assembly adjourns without setting a date for its next meeting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

affidavit

A

affidavit

he has sworn

A formal statement of fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

allocatur

A

allocatur

it is allowed

Generally, a statement from a court that a writ is allowed (i.e. granted); most commonly, a grant of leave to appeal by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in reference to which the word is used equivalently to certiorari (q.v.) elsewhere.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

alter ego

A

alter ego

another I

A second identity living within a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

amicus curiae

A

amicus curiae

friend of the court

A person who offers information to a court regarding a case before it.

24
Q

animus contrahendi

A

animus contrahendi

contractual intent

Intention to contract.

25
Q

animus manendi

A

animus manendi

intention to remain

The subjective intent to remain indefinitely in a place so as to establish it as one’s permanent residence.[2] Along with actual residence, this is used to establish domicile.[3] Also called animus remanendi. See diversity of citizenship.

26
Q

animus nocendi

A

animus nocendi

intention to harm

The subjective state of mind of the author of a crime, with reference to the exact knowledge of illegal content of his behaviour, and of its possible consequences.

27
Q

animus possidendi

A

animus possidendi

intention to possess

“In order to claim possessory rights, an individual must establish physical control of the res and the intention to possess (i.e. animus possidendi)

28
Q

animus revertendi

A

animus revertendi

intention to return

“Wild animals, such as bees and homing pigeons, that by habit go ‘home’ to their possessor. Used when discussing ferae naturae.”

29
Q

animus testandi

A

animus testandi

testamentary intent

The intention, when writing a document, that the document should serve as a last will and testament

30
Q

ante

A

ante

before

“An antenuptial agreement is a contract between two people that is executed before marriage.”

31
Q

(in) arguendo

A

(in) arguendo

for the sake of argument

32
Q

bona fide

A

bona fide

in good faith

Implies sincere good intention regardless of outcome.

33
Q

bona vacantia

A

bona vacantia

ownerless goods

34
Q

Cadit quaestio

A

Cadit quaestio

the question falls

Indicates that a settlement to a dispute or issue has been reached, and the issue is now resolved.

35
Q

Casus belli

A

Casus belli

case of war

The justification for acts of war.

36
Q

Caveat

A

Caveat

May he beware

When used by itself, refers to a qualification, or warning.

37
Q

Caveat emptor

A

Caveat emptor

Let the buyer beware

In addition to the general warning, also refers to a legal doctrine wherein a buyer could not get relief from a seller for defects present on property which rendered it unfit for use.

38
Q

Certiorari

A

Certiorari

to be apprised

A type of writ seeking judicial review.

39
Q

Cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex

A

Cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex

when the reason for a law ceases, so does the law itself

Herbert Broom′s text of 1858 on legal maxims lists the phrase under the heading ″Rules of logic″, stating: Reason is the soul of the law, and when the reason of any particular law ceases, so does the law itself.

40
Q

Ceteris paribus

A

Ceteris paribus

with other things the same

More commonly rendered in English as “All other things being equal.”

41
Q

compos mentis

A

compos mentis

having command of mind

Of sound mind. Also used in the negative “Non compos mentis”, meaning “Not of sound mind”.

42
Q

condicio sine qua non

A

condicio sine qua non

A condition without which it could not be

An indispensable and essential action, condition, or ingredient.

43
Q

consensus ad idem

A

consensus ad idem

agreement to the same

Meeting of the minds, mutual assent, or concurrence of wills. Parties must be of one mind and their promises must relate to the same subject or object[7] Also consensus in idem.

44
Q

contra

A

contra

against

Used in case citations to indicate that the cited source directly contradicts the point being made.

45
Q

contra legem

A

contra legem

against the law

Used when a court or tribunal hands down a decision that is contrary to the laws of the governing state.

46
Q

contradictio in adjecto

A

contradictio in adjecto

contradiction in itself

A contradiction between parts of an argument.

47
Q

contra proferentem

A

contra proferentem

against the one bringing forth

Used in contract law to stipulate that an ambiguous term in a contract shall be interpreted against the interests of the party that insisted upon the term’s inclusion. Prevents the intentional additions of ambiguous terminology from being exploited by the party who insisted on its inclusion.

48
Q

coram non judice

A

coram non judice

before one who is not a judge

Refers to a legal proceeding without a judge, or with a judge who does not have proper jurisdiction.

49
Q

corpus delicti

A

corpus delicti

body of the crime

A person cannot be convicted of a crime, unless it can be proven that the crime was even committed.

50
Q

corpus juris

A

corpus juris

body of law

The complete collection of laws of a particular jurisdiction or court.

51
Q

corpus juris civilis

A

corpus juris civilis

body of civil law

The complete collection of civil laws of a particular jurisdiction or court. Also sometimes used to refer to the Code of Justinian.

52
Q

corpus juris gentium

A

corpus juris gentium

body of the law of nations

The complete collection of international law.

53
Q

corpus juris secundum

A

corpus juris secundum

An encyclopedia of US law drawn from US Federal and State court decisions.

54
Q

crimen falsi

A

crimen falsi

crime of falsifying

Forgery

55
Q

cui bono

A

cui bono

as a benefit to whom?

Suggests that the perpetrator(s) of a crime can often be found by investigating those who would have benefited financially from the crime, even if it is not immediately obvious.

56
Q

curia advisari vult

A

curia advisari vult

the court wishes to consider

Signifies the intent of a court to consider the points of law argued during advocacy, prior to judgement.