Common Assault And Battery Flashcards

1
Q

Assault definition

A

An act which causes the victim to apprehend the infliction of immediate, unlawful force with either intention or recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus reus of assault

A

An act

Which causes the victim to apprehend the inflcition of immediate,unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is an ommission sufficient to constitute an assault

A

No it is not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Are words sufficient for an assault, which case shows this

A

Yes, R v Constanza (1997) the court held that letters can be an assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v constanza (1997) brief description and what does this case show

A

Words are sufficient for an assault.

D had written 800 letters and the Victim interpreted the last 2 letters as clear threats.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v contanza (1997) key quote

A

Fear of violence at some point, not excluding the immediate future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v lamb (1967) description

A

Pointing an unloaded gun at someone who knows that it is unloaded cannot be an assault. This is becuase the person does not fear immediate force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking (1983)

A

D broke into garden looked through window of Victim at 11pm.
V was terrified and thought that d was about to enter the toom.
Basis of the fear was that she did not know what he was going to do next, but it was likely it would be of a violent nature.
Fear of what he might do was sufficiently immediate for the purposes of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Words indicating there will be no violence may prevent an act from being an assault which case demonstrates this

A

Tuberville v Savage (1669)
D placed one hand on his sword and said ‘if it were not assize time, i would not take such language from you’
Not held to be an assault as what he said showed he was not going to do anything.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Light (1857)

A

D raised a sword above the head of his wife and said ‘were it not for the bloody policeman outside, i would split your head open’
It was held that this was an assault as the wife feared that force was going to be used on her and the words in the circumstances did not negate that fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fear of any unwanted touching is sufficient:

A

The force or unlawful personal violence which is feared need not be serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Examples of assault

A

Raising a fist as though about to hit the victim.
Throwing a stine at the victim which just misses.
Pointing a loaded gun at someone within range.
Making a threat by saying ‘i am goingt yo hit you’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Unlawfullness of force

A

The force which is threatened must be unlawful. If it is lawdul, there is no offence of common assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition of battery

A

The application of unlawful force to another person with intention or recklessness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Collins v wilcock (1984) what does this case show

A

Slightest of touching can be a battery, and always is if there was physical restraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wood (fraser) v DPP (2008)

A

Facts
An officer took hold of W’s arm to check his identity.
Law
This was a battery by the police and W was entitled to struggle to release himself

17
Q

Fagan v MPC (1968)

A

Facts
D,unknowingly, stopped his car with a wheel on a policeman’s foot and refused to move when requested
Law
The actus reus of battery can be an ongoing act so that the complete offence is committed when D forms the mens rea

18
Q

DPP v K (1990)

A

Facts
D put acid in a hand drier - the next person to use it was sprayed with acid
Law
An indirect act can be the actus reus of battery

19
Q

DPP v Santa-Bermudez (2003)

A

Facts
D failed to tell a policewoman that he had a needle in his pocket- she was injured when she searched him.
Law
An ommision is sufficient for the actus reus of battery.