Common Assault Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Common assault

A

Section 39 of the criminal justice act
- assault
- battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Max punishment

A

6 months imprisonment and/or £5000 fine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actus reus of assault

A

‘An act’ - the victim does not have to be physically struck, can be a verbal threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Assault

A

The causing of fear for immediate, unlawful force (no touching).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cases for assault

A
  • Constanza = ‘fear of violence at some point, not excluding the immediate future’
  • Ireland = silent phone calls can be assault, depending on the case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The actus reus of assault 2

A

‘Apprehending immediate, unlawful force’ - threats must cause the victim to apprehend that immediate force is going to be used against them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Apprehending immediate unlawful force - cases

A

Lamb - no assault, since there was no fear
Smith - fear can be for the imminent future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can words negate fear, therefore making assault impossible?

A

No - Light = words in that circumstance were not enough to negate fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Battery

A

Application of unlawful force to another person, intending to apply unlawful physical force or recklessness as to whether unlawful force is applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cases for battery

A

Collins v Wilcock
Wood v DPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case of Thomas

A

Touching a person’s clothes whilst they’re wearing them is the equivalent to touching them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Indirect act

A

The defendant causes a force to be applied even if they do not personally touch the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cases for indirect acts

A

Martin
DPP v K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Continuing act

A

A battery committed continuously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case for continuing acts

A

Fagan - at the start there was an act which could be a full offence, but the full offence was not committed at that point because it was without the element of intention. However, it became a full offence when intention was formed to further harm the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Battery without assault

A

Where the victim is unaware that unlawful force is about to be used against them.

17
Q

Battery without assault - case

A

Haystead - indirect force can still constitute battery

18
Q

Battery via omission

A

Criminal liability can rise by way of an omission, but only if the defendant is under a duty to act.

19
Q

Cases for battery via omission

A

Santa- Bermudez - omitting to say lead to application of unlawful force, therefore making it a battery.
Miller - the defendant created a dangerous situation which may have led to a force being applied to a victim, it could’ve become a battery via omission.

20
Q

Unlawful force

A

Force that is not consented or used in self-defence or prevention of crime in a reasonable situation.

21
Q

Unlawful force - case

A

A v. UK - European Court of Human Rights ruled that a law allowing force to be used on children offends article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The article prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.