Commercial Paper Flashcards
Types of Commercial Paper
- Note
2. Draft
Note
A 2-party instrument in which the maker promises to pay a sum of money to the payee
Draft
A 3-party commercial paper in which the drawer orders the second party (drawee or payor) to pay a sum of money to a third-party payee
When there are contradictory terms
- Handwritten terms over typewritten terms
- Typewritten terms over printed terms
- Words over numbers
Formal Requirements of Negotiability
- Writing, signed by drawer/maker
- Contains an unconditional promise or order
- To pay a fixed amount of money
- Payable to order or to bearer
- Payable on demand or at a definite time
- No additional undertaking or instructions
Types of Instruments
- Order Instrument
2. Bearer Instrument
Requirements for Holder in Due Course (HDC)
To become the HDC of a negotiable instrument, one must take the instrument -
- As a holder
- For value
- In good faith
- Without notice of infirmities
How does a person become a holder?
- Issuance
2. Negotiation
Transfer Warranties
- Transferor is entitled to enforce instrument
- All signatures (including drawer’s signature) are authentic and authorized
- Instrument has not been altered
- There are no defenses or claims that can be asserted against transferor
- Maker, acceptor, or drawer is not, to transferor’s knowledge, subject to insolvency proceedings
- With respect to any remotely-created consumer check, the person on whose account the check is drawn has authorized issuance in the amount for which the item is drawn
Shelter Rule
A person to whom an HDC transfers an instrument acquires the rights of an HDC, even if the transferee herself does not qualify as an HDC.
When do transfer warranties apply?
Transferor must transfer the instrument for consideration of transfer warranties to apply.
Beneficiaries of Transfer Warranties
Transferee WHO INDORSES instrument makes warranties to ALL SUBSEQUENT transferees.
Transferee who DOES NOT indorse instrument makes warranties ONLY to IMMEDIATE transferee
In a legal action for enforcement of instrument, what must π prove?
Prima facie case:
(i) entitled to enforce the instrument, and
(ii) signatures are valid
If ∆ makes out a defense, can re-establish by proving HDC status.
In a legal action for enforcement of instrument, what must ∆prove?
∆ may avoid paying by proving defense or claim in recoupment
Real Defenses are effective against whom?
ALL HOLDERS, including HDC