Commercial Law Flashcards
Sale of goods - rights for breach of condition
- Reject goods, terminate contract, sue for damages; or
- Reject goods, affirm contract, demand conforming goods, sue for damages; or
- Accept goods, sue for damages (breach of warranty).
Sale of goods - has the right to reject been lost?
- D’s breach of condition is so slight that it would be unreasonable to terminate the contract - damages only
- Buyer expressly, or by implication waived the breach
- Buyer accepted goods.
Implied terms
- Time is not of the essence unless otherwise stipulated
s. 12 - Title
s. 13 - Sale by description
s. 14 - Satisfactory quality or fitness
s. 15 - Sale by sample
SGA/UCTA claim structure
- Identify claim
- Identify terms breached (express or implied)
- Is term breached a condition?
- Identify remedies available
- Has the right to reject been lost
a. Breach so slight
b. expressly/by implication waived
c. Buyer has accepted the goods - Is there an exclusion / limitation of liability (UCTA alarm bells)
a. Exclusion / limitation PLUS:
b. Party trying to exclude liability for negligence
c. Exclusion / limitation of ss.13-15
d. One party contracting on another’s standard terms - If so, apply UCTA reasonableness test.
- What remedies remain?
International Sales - Jurisdiction & Governing Law
Jurisdiction - Brussels Regulation:
- Does the regulation apply? (Civil & commercial matters, EU member state, After 10 Jan 2015)
- Do courts of E&W have jurisdiction?
a. General rule - D’s domiciled state (4) (court applies international law to decide where this is (62)
b. May be sued in another member state (7)
c. Special jurisdiction (24-26 (In Rem, Choice, Accept)) - Will they accept jurisdiction? (has another country accepted)
Governing Law - Rome I
- Scope (1) All cases involving conflict of laws, civil & commercial
- General rule (3) - contract governed by chosen law
- Where no express or implied choice - Art.4 (seller)
Mandatory rules (3&4) - where all aspects of a contract other than choice point to given jurisdiction, courts may imply certain rules of national law if they are of a kind that cannot be derogated by agreement.
Overriding provisions (9) - Countries may continue to apply law to protect its public interest.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) - Incoterms 2010
- ‘F’ terms - provide that B is responsible for paying for cost of main carriage after loading
- ‘C’ terms - contracts for main carriage and insurance to the port are taken out and paid for by S
- ‘D’ terms - seller assumes risk and cost of transport all the way to agreed place of destination.
CIF terms - Seller’s obligations
- Procure contract of carriage / shipping to B at port of destination.
- Load conforming goods on board the vessel
- Procure marine insurance in the name of the buyer
- Tender documents to the buyer:a. Bill of lading (functions as receipt (proof of loading), transport contract effected by S but transferable to B, document of title).
b. Marine insurance policy
c. Commercial invoice
CIF terms - Buyer’s obligations
- Accept (take up) conforming documents
- Pay for goods as provided for in the contract
- Take responsibility for the goods from the point of loading - arrange for import at port of destination and onward delivery.
CIF terms - remedies for damage in transit.
S has no liability for damage in transit if:
- No indication that goods don’t conform to contract on loading or that seller did not present conforming documents.
- Thus, S has discharged duties under CIF and risk passes to B on loading.
- B’s remedies are to claim under marine insurance or against carrier (if damage was caused by breach of contract of carriage).
E-commerce regulations - Online sales
- Company website = ‘Information Society Service’
- Company is therefore a service provider
- T&Cs will specify the point of sale:
a. Must be brought to attention of B
b. B must be able to read them
c. Best is tick box / scroll down mech.
E-commerce regulations - Liability of service providers
- e-commerce regs. give service providers immunity re. user-generated content provided:
a. report abuse mechanisms
b. T&Cs must provide that:
- users do not post unlawful content
- SP may remove content at its discretion
Distribution Agreements - Structure
- Does the Chapter I prohibition apply (s.2 CA)?
a. Agreement / Decision / Concerted practice
b. Prevention / Restriction / distortion of competition
c. Effect on UK trade / implemented in UK s.2(3) - Can you rely on block exemption (s.10 CA parallel exemption - apply VABE)?
- Is the effect on competition appreciable (NAOMI)?
a. Intentionally anti-competitive
b. hardcore restrictions
c. market shares (up to 15%) - s.9 Exemptions - Self-assess (four criteria)?
a. Positive benefit
b. Fair share consumers
c. Necessity
d. Not allow elimination of competition. - Infringement consequences?
- advise client of penalties and risks. Better to:
a. Stop prohibited activity; and
b. Whistle blow (mitigating factors, settlement discount)
- advise client of penalties and risks. Better to:
Distribution Agreements - does VABE apply?
- Vertical agreement
- Satisfy market share thresholds (3(1)) (not exceed 30% of relevant market for supplier and purchaser)
- Agreement must not contain restrictions as defined in VABE (4&5):
a. Price fixing (4a)
b. Territorial restrictions (active v passive sales). (4b)
c. Non-compete (5) (theoretically severable)