combustion Flashcards
what is the chemistry of combustion?
CHxOy (biomass) + o2 (21% of air) +H2O = ch4 + co +co2 +H2 +H2O (unreacted steam) + char + tar
2C+O2 = 2CO (partial oxidation)
C+O2=CO2 (complete oxidation reaction)
C+2H2 = CH4 (hydrogasification reaction)
CO+H2O = CO2 + H2 (water gas shift reaction)
CH4+ H2o = co +3h2 (steam reforming reaction)
C+CO2 = 2co (Boudourd reaction)
learn these units
Energy input: waste (MJ/kg) Energy loss (MJ/kg) - residual carbon - heat loss due to temperature difference of residue - heat loss due to radiation
Net energy output: Energy input - energy loss
what is the estimated solid waste management costs by disposal method, world markets 2012?
WTE incineration - above 50% lower middle income: 40-100$ upper middle income: 60-150$ high income: 65-150$
advantages of incineration
reduction of volume (85-95%) reduction of mass (70-85% the mass leaves through the stack) Reduction of hygienic risks energy recovery can be located close to the waste source
disadvantages of incineration
costly
air pollution
destroys resourcs that otherwise could be recovered
development of waste incineration plants
1st generation- 1950-1965 (no heat recovery, no flue gas cleaning)
- major objectives: reduction of volume of waste and maximum burning
- development of furnaces waste burning (mainly grates)
- usually lack of heat utilization
- lack of flue gas cleaning
2nd generation (1960-1975) (primary flue gas cleaning with heat recovery)
- dedusting of flue gas
- utilization of waste heat (heat utilization boilers)
3rd generation (1975-1990) (further flue gas cleaning, improvement of energy recovery)
- reduction of gaseous pollutant emissions (mainly sulfur, chlorine and fluor compounds)
- reductions of heavy metals
- problems with safety storage of solid residues
- improvement of waste heat utilization
4th generation (1990) further flue gas cleaning, safe application/ disposal of ash) to safety storage:
- cement blocks
- vitrification
what are some examples of incineration plants?
The spittelau incineration plant in Vienna, Austria
the marchwood silver dome Southampton UK
WtE facility in Brescia, Italy
No matter how good the design and public consultation to public image of incineration in the UK is poor!
an example in the poolbeg incineration- south London
what is public opposition based on?
- potential human health and environmental risks from emissions and ash
- whether recycling is being supported to the maximum extent possible
- lack of early public involvement in decision making
- facility reliability and the quality of operator training
- impacts of property values and traffic patterns
- contentions that sites are sometimes selected to avoid middle and higher income neighbours that have sufficient resources to fight such development.
environment agency 2003 statement
the weight of evidence from studies so far indicates that present day practice for managing solid municipal waste has, at most, a minor effect on human health and the environment, particularly, when compared to other everyday activities.
incineration in western Europe today
- in mid 2013, approximately 520 WtE plants were operational in Europe
- 95million tonnes of MSW and commercial waste per year
- EfW supplied: electricity for 8million households and heat for 15.3million households
- over the past five years, the European wte capacity grew by an annual treatment capacity of 19million tonnes (24%)
what are the combustion and incinerator stypes
mass burning of heterogenous waste
- waste incinerators (moving grate system)
- rotary kilns (e.g. cement production)
burning of homogenized waste
- fluidized bed incinerators
- co-combustion in power plants/ cement kilns
what is pretreatment of MSW prior to combustion
incineration of unprocessed waste is convenient and simple, but can lead to problems
separate:
- recyclables (plastics, glass, metal)
- hazardous materials (pesticides, cleaners)
- non-combustibles (concrete, stone)
advantages of RDF
- simplifies handling of feed into incinerator
- ensures a more homogenous feedstock
- can include step to reduce water content, thereby improving heating value
- can incorporate recovery of recyclables into process
- incineration options increase (use circulating fluidized bed incinerators)
- it is claimed that less pollutant production from fluidized bed incinerators
- more costly than mass burn incinerators
RDF combustion
several variants
- simpliest involve separating marketable material before combustion
- shredding
- removal of recyclables
- possible sterilization, pelletisation, other
- shredding enables feeding MSW in quasi-fluidized bed state
- mechanical-biological treatment is usually used for RDF
what does a typical incineration plant include
bunker and feeding system combustion system energy recovery air pollution control combustion ash handling
- learn diagram for exam
what is waste storage and feeding
must maintain enough refuse to run incinerator 24hours/day
minimum 3-4 day storage
refuse loaded into a pit or onto a tipping floor
what is the capacity of a waste bunker delivery area?
3-4 days to ensure constant feed of waste over weekends and holiday periods
the bunker control room itself is kept under negative pressure. the air is fed into the furnace