com 409 exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Key points of quintilian

A

theory of the orator- “the good man speaking well.” (the morality of the orator); education of the orator (character and teaching); giving shape to the technical process of speech- imitation & progymnasmata; study of the art, artist, and work of rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is progymnasmata? (quinitilian)

A

training in specific practices of language use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

grammar, rhetoric, and the courtroom (quinitilian)

A

rhetoric is the “next step” beyond grammar and education; rhetorical exercises- progymanasmata, speaking from complex to simple topics; goal is effective argument in courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what kind of teacher is required? (quintilian)

A

a parent toward his pupils; morality first and foremost; discipline through patience, judgment, approval, and condemnation- ex: “no applause” ; teaching requires a judgment of the student and his abilities, “exuberance”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

progymnasmata- progession (quinitilian)

A

narration- “with substance”- practice, refutation, confirmation; praise and blame of those individuals; comparing the virtues/vices of unnamed (abstract) individuals; comparison of real individuals/ values; thesis/antithesis- comparison & argument regarding things ; “copius” description; praise and blame of the laws- most “mature”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

history and style (quinitilian)

A

teachers can instruct students through historical speeches and examples; students should speak from the work of great writers; both composition and style of works- choosing what is “amplified”; students should aim to be between ancient and modern style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

assumptions of rhetorical education (quinitilian)

A

teachers “accommodate” natural abilities but aims to exceed them (isocrates)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

natural skill is not enough (quintilian)

A

rhetorical instruction teaches the connection between ideas and arranged speech (isocrates); against overly vigorous or overly memorized speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

speaking beyond “rules” (quinitilian)

A

no “general” or “constant” rule; the orator, in all his pleadings, should keep 2 things in mind- what is becoming and what is expedient; importance of time, “the case at hand”, necessity- can we change the situation?; alteration of rules is mark of skillful oratory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how is rhetoric an “art”? rhetoric as an art, artist, & work (quinitilian)

A

art: rhetoric attained by study, “how to speak well”; artist: the orator, “whose business it is to speak well”; work: what is “achieved” by the artist, “good speaking”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“the art of speaking well”- against aristotle

A

aristotle detaches himself from the event; quinitilian (like plato) believes speech must be “good” or “just”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

“the good man speaking well” (quint.)

A

both effectively and virtuously. quint sidesteps the criticism of oratory by redefining it - nature and practice of rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

oratory is an art, not a simple practice (quint.)

A

its end is to speak well. requires education and method. the orators art consists in his act, not in the result. like other arts- doctors, philosophers etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

answering gorgias- is rhetoric a positive or neutral virtue? (quint)

A

process of education makes it positive. perfect oratory requires virtue & knowledge, speakers should only speak on topics they know. rhetoric is universal, “everything that may come before an orator for discussion.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

on imitation and writing (quint)

A

imitation of good models. writing as a form of expression and thinking. writing is the “teacher of eloquence”. teaches judgment, arrangement, selection, & revision. careful writing, habits, and corrections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the orator as good man speaking well (quint.)

A

moral character and duties of the orator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

who is the perfect orator? (quint.)

A

“a calmer of the populance”. does not argue against his own beliefs. but must study vice in order to know what virtue is- justice and injustice, trying cases to “improve” the guilty or benefit of society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

the characteristics of the orator (quint)

A

the orator should be a “roman wise man”. morality-above all. rhetorical “offices”- orator must be imaginative, steady in mind, strong memory. the body: the orator does not depend merely on knowledge, but on strength of voice, lungs, constitution. To accomplish such a task is difficult. and no one has accomplished it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

conclusions of quintilian

A

close connection with many previous thinkers (isocrates &cicero); quintilian extends rhetoric through morality and education - universality of rhetoric, education as a technical process. quintilian defines rhetoric more clearly- orator: “good man speaking well”, rhetoric combines art, artist, and work; focus on the nature and teaching of the orator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

shifting “boundaries of rhetoric and philosophy (boethius)

A

philosphical argument (dialectic) deals with theses: “general questions); rhetoric with hypotheses: specific instances; rhetoric becomes a means of applying general rules, established by dialectic, to specific cases; rhetoric takes a preliminary and subordinate place in the medieval university curriculum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

a “treatment of the whole” (boethius)

A

we shall treat the genus of the art, its species, its parts, its tools, and the parts of the tools, the duty of its practitioners, and its goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is a genus? (boethius)

A

“a faculty”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is a species? (boethius)

A

judicial, demonstrative, deliberative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what are parts? (boethius)

A

general principles or specific applications of principles

25
Q

categorizing the forms of appeal (boethius)

A

“the category into which the material falls comes from the rhetoric”; no necessary subject matter or content

26
Q

the parts of rhetoric- from cicero (boethius)

A

invention, arrangement, style, memory, delivery. “if an orator lacks any one of them, his use of faculty is incomplete.”

27
Q

rhetoric vs dialectic returns (boethius)

A

rhetoric and “civil oration”; dialectic is not of public concern- developed through questions and answers; rhetoric deal with civil hypotheses.

28
Q

rhetoric vs dialectic cont. (boethius)

A

compared to dialectic: “when not of public concern (dialectic) is developed through questions and answers; rhetoric deals with “civil hypotheses.” rhetoric needs both an adversary and a judge. dialectic has a for a judge the same person who acts as adversary.

29
Q

the parts of rhetoric- from cicero (boethius)

A

“Unless the author discovers suitable material, clothes it in a good style, arranges it properly, remembers and delivers it well, he accomplishes nothing.”

30
Q

the parts of oration- the “tool” of rhetoric (boethius)

A

Introduction/Exordium; Argument – Stating the thesis/claim; Partition – Organization/Preview; Proof – Logical Argumentation; Refutation – Answering counterarguments;
Peroration – Appeals to audience (pathos-driven)
“It is the duty of the faculty of rhetoric to teach and to move.”

31
Q

double duty of the orator- the speaker and the audience (boethius)

A

he must say he has spoken in a way calculated to persuade; and in his audience he must have truly persuaded them. is this more like aristotle or like cicero/quinitilian ex: “moral” orators

32
Q

the parts of the oratory and the parts of the cases (boethius)

A

constitutiones and “issues”. ex: the husband, the wife, and the brothel- the definition is not part of the controversy, it is the whole controversy. “No constitutio can be called a “part of the case” in which it figures, because it is the subject of the dispute…” (we can design different rhetorical speeches around different subjects of dispute.) The constitutiio is part of the case…generally.

33
Q

Conclusions of Boethius

A

rhetoric deals with specific cases and their variety- it applies ciceronian & aristotelian thinking to specific instances. Constitutiones frame rhetorical disputes

34
Q

Conclusions of Boethius

A

rhetoric diminished: rhetoric does not deal with general questions. All general questions become questions of philosophy. Dialectic becomes separated from- even opposite of- rhetoric.

35
Q

intro to renaissance rhetoric

A

14th-17th ad. rhetoric’s vast scope- religion, law and politics(authority uncertain between religion and secular gov.), history & culture(literature, public life, private power), humanism( the capacity to know and change the world).

36
Q

what does renaissance rely on?

A

style to make sense out of public participation in an increasingly complex social life

37
Q

the coming conflict of science and rhetoric

A

education- for the pure reason or public life?; dialectic(logic) vs rhetoric(humanism)

38
Q

what do humanists oppose?

A

scholasticism which stressed the knowledge of external reality rather than emphasizing the mind’s power to reimagine or reshape reality

39
Q

major themes of renaissance

A

I: Italian Humanism: Petrarch
II: Northern European Humanism: Ramus
III: Humanism in England

40
Q

rhetoric and italian humanism- petrarch

humanitas

A

humanitas- “cultivated learning” history, philosophy, individuality. education should combine literary art, moral philosophy and civic responsibility in his writing & oratory

41
Q

Petrach - rhetoric and italian humanism

from ideal oratory to public man

A

synthesize christian religion and secular thinking, writing, and acting in society

42
Q

petrarch- rhetoric and italian humanism

A

opposes focus on logic/rationality, study of history, morality etc.

43
Q

the italian humanist could see rhetoric and philosophy as?

A

united. and even rhetoric as supreme—because they began to understand meaning itself as historically established.”

44
Q

historical meaning and practical action. to be active what must the responsible citizen do

A

express philosophical insights in language that is convincing in contemporary circumstances.

45
Q

humanist historical consciousness emphasizes what?

A

personal performance in all intellectual and political action.”
Cf. Castiglione. “Develop personal talents amid constraints of given historical circumstances” (560)

46
Q

from public orator to courtier

A

Power “behind the scenes” (Castiglione)

The Renaissance Man (561)

47
Q

peter ramus

A

Rejects “cumbersome” earlier forms of thought; Criticizes “all authorities, classical or medieval”; Redistributes the responsibilities of philosophy and rhetoric (568); Reduces rhetoric to “mere style”: “By rhetoric Ramus means only the study of stylistic ornamentation, a harmless pastime… for serious business, a plain style is best.”

48
Q

ramus vs. cicero

A

15th Century – Sir Thomas More - Drawn from earlier Italian Humanism; “Through his versatile use of language, the man of wisdom influences history and guides political affairs.”

49
Q

traditional ciceronians

A

“tended to emphasize style and to treat rhetoric as a more courtly accomplishment…”; Focus on style helped “the English language develop its semantic and syntactic resources, which were perceived as inferior to Latin.” (572)
Humanist Education in law, medicine (570-1) social mobility (571) and pluralization of compositional forms (572)

50
Q

ramists

A

Rhetoric is Poetry, not statecraft (572)
Rhetoric into two parts: “Elocution and pronunciation”
Plain Style, Vernacular language
“The shaping function of language… was deplored.” A value-neutral language was the best tool for knowledge.

51
Q

Separation of Knowledge from from Rhetorical Invention

A

ramism separates rhetoric from logic.

52
Q

separating knowledge from rhetorical invention — arnauld?

A

“True Knowledge is a knowledge of things, not words.”

53
Q

francis bacon

A

Science generates knowledge
Human nature can disrupt “accurate” perception of things
“Idols”

54
Q

who is courtier?

A

Skilled in writing and speaking; Increased use of Vernacular language, not “corrupted” Latin; “Elegant” Speaking and Writing– not antique words phrases; Invention and Creative Usage, not just imitation

55
Q

features of the courtier

A

Knowledgeable
Proper Order of Words
Selection of Words – “proper, select, lustrous, well-formed, but above all.. Still used by the people.” (666)
Tempered voice, manner, gestures (“seemly,” “gracious”)
Uses a variety of terms (in different languages), expands their meaning, uses terms “in a sense they do not usually have, transferring them aptly… in order to make them more attractive and beautiful and… to put things before our very eyes…” (667)
What subject matter? “Only grave,”
Relies on “a certain natural judgment and not by any art of rule.”

56
Q

feats. of the courtier- neo-ciceronian

A

No need to “define the virtues,” but “it suffices if he [the courtier] is a man of honor and integrity

57
Q

the courtier and the public space

A

A courtier must be “cautious and reserved rather than forward, and take care not to get the mistaken notion that he knows something he does not know.” Flattery and being flattered: Risks

58
Q

castiglione: conclusions

A

Shifting purposes of style, rhetoric
“Grace,” Lack of affectation
The public is a space of appearance rather than of truth
Is this dangerous?
Self-preservation and Self-expression in public