colorectal Flashcards
colorectal imaging
CT CAP (enhanced) preferred, MRI alternative, PET/CT NOT
PET/CT in colorectal
High false-positive and false-negative, bad for post-op anastamoses and mucinous
first line metastatic colorectal
FOLFIRI or FOLFOX, 56% ORR, ~8mo TTP
infusional 5-FU versus bolus
infusional MORE effective and less toxic
FOLFOX or FOLFIRI?
discuss toxicities with patients to decide. equal. Irinotecan–>greater alopecia; oxali–>cold sensitivity
CapeOx v. FOLFOX for metastatic
PFS equal, but Cape is not more convenient, because you need oxali ANYway. Fine to use either if compliance assured.
Capecitabine in elderly
difficult–> increased age, decreased CrCl, toxicites (not a problem with 5-FU)
scheduling of FOLFOX
Optimox study–> you can drop the oxali after 6 cycles (3 months), to make chemo more managable with no change in PFS.
+bev to FOLFOX/CapeOx for metastatic
improved PFS by only 1.4 months in one study. NO benefit in shrinking tumors; you can add for PFS benefit, but not to shrink tumor more (if need surgery, don’t give, 21d T1/2)
bevacizumab toxicities
THN, GI perf (death rate 0.25%), arterial events, impaired wound healing, albuminuria–> clinically irrelevant if metastatic disease
aflibercept data
VELOUR study–> survival 13.5 v 12mo (42d benefit). however more expensive and same benefit as continuing bev.
bev beyond progression?
1.4mo OS increase if you continue bev when switch.
cetuximab/panitumumb for metastatic?
if ANY RAS mutation or BRAF mutation, do not give (may accelerate), if no mutation, then small PFS benefit in first line setting.
EGFR inhibitor or VEGF inhibitor in first line?
SWOG80405–>randomize FOLFORI/FOLFOX with either cetux or bev–> IDENTICAL. Response rate is equal (FIRE 3 study)
deciding factor or cetuximiab, bev, or neither for first line FOLFOX/FOLFIRI
cetuximab rash is HORRIBLE and required for benefit. but people when have rash that doesn’t mean they will benefit.
cetuximab v. best supportive care
benefit of cetuximab is real, in later lines of therapy