College 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does the effectiveness of advertising depend on? And why?

A

The effectiveness of advertising depends highly on whether people remember the advertisement or not.

This is because there is often some time between being exposed to an advertisement and the actual purchase decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can you make it easier to memorize something?

A

When you make bizarre images when you memorize something, it becomes much easier to memorize these things. And if you tie these bizarre images to a place you know well, it becomes even more easy to memorize these things. So, you make these associations that you know well, and this makes you memorize things better.

Associating things with information that already exists in your memory makes it easier to remember. This is a very effective strategy in advertisement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In which stages of the DAGMAR model is memory important?

A

Memory is mostly important for going from awareness to comprehension & image.

But memory actually influences all of these stages and is therefore highly important to advertising.

Even in stages where you are unaware, memory has in influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does memory do?

A

Memory is involved with recording, storing, and retrieving information.

Memory influences perception, encoding, and storage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Encoding

A

Getting info into the system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Storage

A

Involves information retention (short term and long term)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Retrieval

A

Finding information from memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Basic model of memory as separate systems

A

This model basically posits that there is some sensory input, for instance you see something in the street, and this goes into your sensory memory. If you don’t do anything with this, the information is lost. But if you work with this information, if you rehearse it, it is stored in your long-term-memory. If you do not rehearse this, the information is lost. Our memory has separate systems, and you go from system 1 to system 2 to system 3 to system 4.

Sensory input => sensory memory => short-term memory (STM) => long-term memory (LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Study by Sperling on memory as separate systems.

A

Participants were briefly shown a screen with 12 letters (3 by 4). Participants were asked to remember only one row of letters. But they did not know which row in advance, they were supposed to remember. Only after the screen was gone, they learned which row to learn.

Sperling states that even if you are shown something so briefly, it can be remembered. He did a study where he gave participants a high tone, a middle tone or a low tone after they were shown the letters. Respectively the top, middle or low row.

By hearing the tone people were better at reproducing the letters on the screen, so they are suddenly better at remembering the information represented so briefly.

This means that there is a memory trace that you can still pick up or access, but only when you do something with the information, in this case the reconnection with the tone.

This fits with the notion that you go from the sensory stage to the short-term stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evidence for separate systems

A

STM retrieval faster than LTM retrieval
- Because you are still using the information.

STM: limited capacity
- The magic number is 7 +/- 2.
- If you rehearse it you can remember more, but then it’s no longer in your STM.

Primacy (rehearsed more => LTM) and recency (still in STM) effects
- Primacy effect: items that are presented in the beginning are recalled better and more often than the items that are presented in the middle of the list.
- Recency effect: items presented at the end of the list are recalled better and more often than the items that are presented in the middle of the list.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A study by Glanzer and Cunitz about serial position effects and the primacy and recency effects.

A

A study by Glanzer and Cunitz, where participants had to recall a list of words and they were either asked to do this immediately after the list was presented or after a 30 second delay.

There is definitely a primacy and recency effect. For the primacy effect it doesn’t matter if it was recalled immediately or after 30 seconds. But for the recency effect there was a difference, immediately after it was remembered, but after 30 second this effect disappeared.

This is evidence for STM and LTM and that they are separate systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

More evidence for separate systems

A

STM: sensitive to phonological, acoustic coding => confusing Pee and Tea.
LTM: semantic => confusing Big and Huge.
- STM and LTM appear to use a different form of coding.
- STM participants are more likely to confuse items that sound alike.
- With LTM participants are more likely to confuse items that are conceptually alike.

Neurological impairments (STM may be affected while LTM still intact, and the other way around)
- Studies on amnesia, where the STM works just fine, but the LTM doesn’t.
- There are also studies where the LTM works just fine and the STM doesn’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Do all researchers agree with the separate systems?

A

Not every researcher agrees that the systems are separate. Some are very extreme and say they are not separate at all. Others don’t abandon the idea of separate system but just add something to the model. Like Hitch and Baddely, they added something to the model and made the multi component working memory model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The multi component working memory model by Hitch and Baddely

A

They say that there is this thing that is the central executive. It does not have its own storage capacity, what is does is that it supervise and coordinates the sub subsystems.

The subsystems:
- Phonological loop
- Visuospatial sketchpad
- Episodic buffer

So the central executive determines where the attention goes to and which information is stored in the LTM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Phonological loop

A

Is responsible for short term memory storage, like sound and speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Visuospatial sketchpad

A

Responsible for breath storage and manipulation of visual information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Episodic buffer

A

Stores and integrates information from LTM, the phonological loop and the visuospatial sketchpad.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

According to the multi component working memory model, what determines whether you use your STM or LTM?

A

Attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What do you test if you want to test the effect of an advertisment?

A

You want to assess memory. You can do this in two ways, implicitly or explicitly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explicit memory

A

Conscious awareness

These are old ways to measure memory

  • Recall (e.g., what was the commercial about?)
  • Recognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Implicit memory

A

Unconscious awareness

More modern ways to measure memory

  • Word stem completion
  • Word fragment identification
  • Lexical decision task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Word stem completion

A

People are given the stem (first part of the word) and then have to complete it.

E.g., COM…, if they just saw an ad about a computer, they might finish the word as computer, if it was about communication, they would say communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Word fragment identification

A

You give them parts of the word and see whether they finish it.

E.g., C.M.U.ER

24
Q

Lexical decision task

A

They are presented with words and non-words. People are faster in their decision when they have seen this before. They are better able to recognize whether it is a word or a non-word if they have seen the word before (e.g., in a commercial or presented to them earlier).

E.g., BOY BRK BLF BAT

25
Q

Why does the difference between explicit and implicit measure matter?

A

There is an overreliance on explicit measures, also in marketing.

Implicit measures sometimes superior to explicit measure
- Implicit measures don’t suffer from social desirability.
- Very stable => roots in long-term socialization experiences (older representations).

26
Q

Priming

A

The phenomenon that exposure to a specific object or a specific word in one context increases the accessibility of the mental representation of that object or word in that person’s mind.

The idea of priming is that everything in your head is connected. So if a word is activated, a lot of words that are linked to that are also activated.

You show the people a prime (T1) => evaluation/ behavior/ memory/ … (T2)

27
Q

Even though priming has become very popular, in the last decade there has been a lot of critique on the studies on priming. What is the critique?

A

Not all studies can be replicated, and we now realize that some studies have really exaggerated the results.

Priming may really work, but the literature exaggerates this.

28
Q

How can humans be like fish in the context of priming?

A

Humans are like fish, we’re very simple. So if you see a group of fish in the water, you see that sometimes suddenly all fish go to the left or to the right. Not because they think about this, but because there is a direct link between perception and doing.

Like fish, we also sometimes have this direct link between perception and doing.

29
Q

Experiment on priming and elderly

A

Participants had to make sentences with words related to ‘elderly’ or ‘old’, they then measured how fast they walked out of the room, compared to how fast they walked into the room. They found that people walked significantly slower walking out of the room.

30
Q

Experiment on priming and eating

A

Experiment on the Priming effects of TV food advertising on snacking. TV’s always send out primes. The participants were kids, there was an ad that said ‘eating is fun’ and there were control ads. They gave them goldfish crackers and measured how much children ate.

The result is that watching a food ad, even if it’s not related to the food you’re eating, increases food intake.

31
Q

Experiment on priming and extravagance

A

Extravagance has a negative connotation. Especially in the Netherlands. If you’re too extravagant this is not seen as positive.

Scrambled sentences
- Extravagance: e.g., “money so trivial much waste on things”
- Control: e.g., “refused carry to help an elder luggage” (= also negative)

Then they had to make consumer decisions for themselves, and they had to give some advice to someone else. They could choose between a cheap pair of socks or an expensive pair of socks. Socks are often products that most people don’t see and there are hardly any quality differences in socks (that was the idea in the study at least).

Results were that the people primed with extravagance advised others the more expensive socks more while they themselves bought the cheaper sock more often. So the prime worked for giving advice to others but not for buying the socks themselves.

Later in this study, they primed the participants in the self-condition with a cognitive load task, they had to remember specific numbers while they were primed with this task, and then they would even buy the extravagance socks for themselves.

So the extravagance priming works for giving advice to others but not for buying the socks themselves unless they had a cognitive load task.

32
Q

What are the different types of primes?

A

Supraliminal primes

Subliminal primes

33
Q

Supraliminal primes

A

Primes where people are unaware of the connection you are trying to make.

34
Q

Subliminal primes

A

Primes where people are unaware of the stimulus.

  • An image that is so brief, our brain can’t consciously register it.
  • Subliminal primes are banned in many countries in the world because they are too effective.
35
Q

What are the traditional approaches to test if an add was effective? And what about other measures?

A
  1. Remember?
  2. Recognize?

But what about the implicit measures?
o Implicit measures can capture positive effects that would otherwise go unnoticed.

36
Q

How does involvement affect a brand choice?

A

Low involvement: repetitive, habit
- Relatively automatically
- Based on familiarity and experience
- Little search or deliberation
- Often household items

High involvement (e.g., car or house)
- Often very expensive
- They often think more explicitly about their purchase

37
Q

When/ how do we make up our mind?

A

Online choice

Memory-based choice

38
Q

Online choice

A
  • Online = not necessarily on the internet, but when you are making a decision while taking in the info.
  • Immediately; as we take in the info.
  • You have a few options and choose one that you’re going to buy.
  • Recalled arguments weakly related to evaluation.
39
Q

Memory-based choice

A
  • You retrieve information and later on you make the decision to buy something in the store.
  • Recalled arguments strongly related to evaluation.
40
Q

Experiment by Hastie & Park on online vs. memory-based choices.

A

They had participants determine the suitability for somebody as a computer programmer.

They had 5 min conversations with people.

The participants either knew that they had to make a judgement about whether to hire the person or they did not know this and only heard afterwards. Knowing (online) vs. not yet knowing (memory-based) that you have to make a judgement.

If you take a look at the correlation about what people remember and the evaluation of the computer programmer, you see that for “online” decisions there is no correlation between memory and judgement. But there is a correlation between memory-based decisions.

41
Q

Why is there such a poor relationship between what you remember and your online decision?

A

How we deal with info online:
- You are choosing between the products, and you know that you have to make a decision.
- We rely more on our reactions to the information and the original information we already had than on the information itself.

How we make our decisions:
- Online: We rely more on whether we thought this was a good product, thus more on our evaluations of the information than on the information itself.
- Memory based: You are not busy with making a decision while you take in the information, you are only making a decision afterwards and then you just have to remember the information that you were provided with.

42
Q

Stimulus based strategy

A

Making up your mind in the presence of the products.

E.g., you go grocery shopping with a grocery list and you make up your mind on which brand to buy when you are in the supermarket, in the presence of the brands.

Often related to online decisions, but not the same.

43
Q

Memory-based strategy

A

Making up your mind in the absence of the products.

E.g., you already know which car you want to buy before you approach a car dealer.

Often related to memory based decisions, but not the same.

44
Q

Does priming always work for the better?

A

No.

Priming Dr. Pepper could increase choices for Coca Cola if you do not say anything positive about Dr. Pepper.

This is especially likely to happen when the competitor is a famous and well known competitor.

Implication: think before you prime! Priming = awakening a set of related concepts (and brands!)

45
Q

Retroactive interference

A

Learned back then <= learn now

46
Q

Proactive interference

A

Learned back then => learn now

47
Q

Sources of interference

A

Competitive interference:
- Similar products by different brands
- If you say positive things about your product, this can cause positive thoughts about your competitor.

Contextual interference:
- Similar contexts/ advertising execution
- It’s not the products that are similar but the context.

48
Q

Experiment by Burke & Srull (1998) on competitive interference

A

Competitive, retroactive interference
- Especially after having watched an ad while not (yet) considering buying the product.
- If you already considered buying it, you already made up your mind and the information processing is more shallow.
- More interference for similar products.
- Learned back then: Target ads => Learn now: “Confusion” ads

Competitive, proactive interference.
- More interference for similar products.
- But not affected by processing goal.
- Learned back then: “Confusion” ads => Learned now: “Target ads”.

49
Q

Moderators

A

Moderated by processing goal (see before).

Moderated by familiarity
- Better incorporation in existing schemas
- Higher attention for familiar brands

50
Q

When is interference not bad?

A

When you are a copycat.

51
Q

What to do about interference?

A
  • Repetition
  • The serial position of your commercial
  • Retrieval cues
52
Q

How can repetition combat interference?

A

Things that are repeated also get more attention.

Things that are repeated are better encoded. If you repeat it a lot it is likely you encode it in different contexts as well.

Retrieval
- Retrieval is also a learning event
- You rehearse the same message again and again and again.

53
Q

What are the downsides of repetition?

A

Repition can be risky.

When it comes to attitudes, you can get sick and tired of the commercial after you’ve seen it a lot of times. This can be shown as an inverted U-shape.

So, too much repetition is bad, and you attitude can become negative.

54
Q

How can the serial position of your commercial in a commercial block combat interference?

A

The amount of interference differs a lot when you are in the beginning, the middle or the end of a commercial block.

Primacy (and recency) effects in ad block.

Being the first commercial generally works the best, because this leads to better processing.

Being the last commercial may work, but only if the show starts immediately after.

55
Q

How can retrieval cues (in the store) help to combat interference?

A

Reminding the consumers about the times they have seen the commercial before.
- E.g., polar bear from commercial on the product or right next to it.

56
Q

What happens after the consumer has bought and consumed the product?

A

You cannot stop yet.

Information after the fact may distort memory.

57
Q

Does it matter if the consumer buys and consumes the product before or after seeing the ad?

A

Yes, it matters.

Before: selective information search.
- If you first see the ad and then use the product, and then ask them how good the product is. They may selectively focus on the information that you saw in the ad.

After: memory = reconstruction. Selective retrieval/ distortion
- If you first use the product and then see the ad, and then ask them how good the product is. This has less impact then first seeing the ad. The information from the ad can be interpreted based on the previous experience with the product. The actual experience gives you selective attention on what the commercial is about.