Cognitive Psychology (Memory) Flashcards
Explain what is meant by the term encoding in memory. (2 marks)
Encoding refers to the way that material is changed so it can be stored in memory e.g. information is encoded acoustically for storage in STM.
Describe a research study that has investigated encoding in memory (4 marks)
Baddely (1966) carriede out an experiment to test the effect of acoustic and semantic similarity on the ability to recall from STM and LTM. The IV was whether the words were similar or dissimilar semantically and acoustically. The DV was the accuracy of recalling words from the STM and LTM. He found that acoustically similar words (e.g. glass, grass) created problems with recall from STM and semantically similar words (e.g. grass, lawn) created problems with recall from the LTM.
Outline and evaluate research on encoding and/or capacity in memory (12 marks)
(A01) Miller/ STM capacity 7+/-2 items/ he also found that people could remember the same of ‘chunks’ of material e.g. they could remember 7 words just as easily as 7 letters. Bahrick, capacity of LTM
(A02) Cowan/ more recent study/ concluded that capacity is actually just four. This also supported by Vogel et al/ confirmed that the capacity of STM was limited to about four chunks of info.
(A01) Baddely tested the effect of acoustic and semantically similarity on the ability to recall words encoded in STM and LTM. Found PPs had more difficulties recalling acoustically similar words from the STM and semantically similar from the LTM.
(A02) The finding that STM relies on acoustic coding has been challenged by research that suggests that STM may also rely on visual codes (e.g. Brandimote et al.) Similarly, research has also suggesting that encoding in LTM may use visual codes and even acoustic encoding for some memories. This suggests that although encoding in STM is primarily acoustic, and encoding in LTM primarily semantic, it not exclusively so.
Describe Glanzer and Cunitz’s primacy recency effect
They gave PPs a list of 20 words, presented one word at a time then asked them to recall any of the words they could remember. Two groups of PP were used in the study. Group A were tested immediately after being presented with the words. Group B had to perform a distraction task (so they couldn’t rehearse the words) and then recall the words after 30 seconds. In Group A PPs were most likely to remember words at the start of the list (the primacy effect) and at the end of the list (the recency effect). The recency effect disappeared in group B.
This support the MSM because the first words have been able to be rehearsed and transferred to LTM in Group A but not B. The recency effect is evidence of STM as Group A PPs were able to recall words from their limited duration STM.
Advantages of the MSM
- -1st model of memory so highly influential
- -supported by lab experiments e.g. Glanzer and Cunitz’s primacy recency effect
- -supported by case study KF, a man/ woman who was in a motorcycle accident, and had a damaged STM and digit span which was just 2, but his LTM was fully intact. This shows STM and LTM are separate.
- -Also supported by Peterson’s and Bahrick’s research.
- -Real world applications
Disadvantages of MSM
- -doesn’t consider the fact that we are more likely to remember important information, i.e in flash bulb memories. In flash-bulb memories no rehearsal is needed. (Non-deliberate storage).
- -over simplistic, suggests STM has just one store, unlike the WMW.
Outline Bahrick’s research into the duration of LTM (1975)
Bahrick et al (1975) investigated what they called very long term memory (VLTM). Nearly 400 participants aged 17 – 74 were tested. There were various tests including: A free recall test, where participants tried to remember names of people in a graduate class. A photo recognition test, consisting of 50 pictures. A name recognition test for ex-school friends.
Results of the study showed that participants who were tested within 15 years of graduation were about 90% accurate in identifying names and faces. After 48 years they were accurate 80% for verbal and 70% visual. Free recall was worse. After 15 years it was 60% and after 48 years it was 30% accurate.
Shows duration of LTM is potentially unlimited.
Name some memory improvement strategies, differentiate verbal and visual.
Mnemonics-any structured memory technique
Verbal
- -Acronyms e.g. ROYGBIV
- -Acrostics e.g. My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Noodles
Visual
- -Methods of loci
- -Mind maps
Chunking
Describe Baddelly and Hitch’s Dual Task Technique (1976)
Procedure: PPs were asked were asked to perform two tasks at the same time- a digit span task which required them to repeat a list of numbers, and a verbal reasoning task which required them to answer true or false to various questions.
Results: As the number of digits increased in the digit span, PPs only took fractions of a second longer to answer the reasoning questions.
Con: The verbal reasoning task made use of the central executive and the digit span task made use of the phonological loop.
Advantages of the WMW
- -more detailed in explained the STM compared tot eh unitary stores the MSM.
- -supported by the dual task technique (central executive and phonological used at the same time).
- -supported by KF, damaged digit span only 2 (so phonological loop damaged) but visual memory fine.
Disadvantaged of the WMW
- -only outline the STM, unlike the MSM whcih address the sensory, ST and LTM. This also means it has less practical applications.
- -description of central executive vague, or there 2? What is the capacity/ duration of the stores? The MSM has evidence of the duration and capacity.
- -Reductionist, suggests all spatial information must first be visualised in the visuo spatial sketch pad. However, Lieberman points out that blind people have excellent spatial awareness without having any visual information. This suggests there are multiple visual stores.
4 stages of the CI
- Report everything
- Mental reinstatement
- Changing the order
- Changing the perspective
Who created the CI?
Fisher and Geiselman
Outline (and maybe evaluate) research into CIs
Kohnken: meta-analysis of 53 studies, found, on average, an increase of 34% in the amount of correct information generated in CIs compared to SIs. However most of these studies tested volunteered PP (usually college students) in the laboratory.
Milne and Bull: examined the effectiveness of all 4 components on undergraduate students and children were interviewed using just one component and compared to a control group (who were just asked simply ‘try again’) Recall across each component was mostly similar, and there was no sig. different compared to the control group. However when PPs were interviewed with a combo of the components ‘report everything’ and ‘mental reinstatement’ the recall was significantly higher.
Stein and Memon (2006) Tested CI in Brazil, first time it had been used in a developing country. Women recruited from the cleaning staff of a large university, they were required to watch a video of an abduction. Ci got more correct info than the SI. CI produced more forensically rich info e.g. a detailed description of the man holding the gun. This means CI could help reduce the incidence of miscarriage of justice in developing countries.
Mello and Fisher: Many old people are reluctant to report info due to stereotypes. Mello and Fisher compared older (mean 72 yrs old) and younger (mean 22 yrs old) adult’s memories of a filmed simulated crime using either an CI or an SI. CI produced more correct info, and the CI was greater for the older PPs than for the younger ones.
Advantages of CIs
Effective-
Kohnken 34% increase meta analysis
Milne and Bull stages 1+2 combined produces significantly more correct info
Better for oldies
Mello and Fisher, compared older and younger PPs, found that the older people benefited more from the CI than the younger people.
Real World Applications
Stein and Memon
women in a uni, shown film of an abduction, CI produced more forensically rich information, could reduce miscarriage of justice.