Cognitive Psychology Exam 4 Flashcards
Affirming the Antecedent
p therefore q
Denying the consequent
not q therefore not p
affirming the consequent
q therefore p
denying the antecedent
not p therefore not q
Which types of conditional syllogisms are valid?
Affirming the antecedent and denying the consequent
Which cards should you turn over in the Wason Four-Card Problem if the statement is: If Vowel, then even number – E K 4 7
E (affirming antecedent) 7 (denying consequent)
Falsification Principle
To test a rule, it is necessary to look for situations that would falsify the rule
What does the beer example vs card example show and prove
SHOWS: People did better on the card task when it was beers and drinking ages than when it was numbers and letters
PROVES: being able to relate the beer task to regulations about drinking makes it easier – concrete tasks are easier than abstract ones
Pragmatic Reasoning Schema
A pragmatic reasoning schema is a way of thinking about cause and effect in the world that is learned as part of experiencing everyday life
Permission Scheme
An example of the pragmatic reasoning schema that states that if a person satisfies condition A (such as being
the legal age for drinking), then he or she gets to carry out action B (being served alcohol).
Cholera Example
cholera and hepatitis included in the card experiment and people were surprisingly good which is kind alarming
social exchange theory
an important aspect of human behavior is the ability for two people to cooperate in a way that is beneficial to both people
What are two options to explain the four card problem
Cheating
Permission
Conclusion of Four Card Problem
Context is Important!!!!!!
familiar situations can often generate better reasoning than abstract statements or statements that people cannot relate to. However, familiarity is not always necessary for
conditional reasoning (as in the tattoo problem), and situations have also been devised
in which people’s performance is not improved, even in familiar situations
What are factors that lead to the strength of evidence in inductive reasoning?
Representativeness of observations – How well do the observations about a particular category represent all of the members of that category?
Number of observations
Quality of the evidence – strength of the observation (helps to include scientific facts in the evidence)
Availability Heuristic
events that are more easily remembered are
judged as being more probable than events that are less easily remembered
Which Heuristic does the letter R in first or third position prove
Availability Heuristic
Illusory correlations
Illusory correlations occur when a correlation between two events appears to exist, but in reality there is no correlation or it is
much weaker than it is assumed to be. Illusory correlations can occur when we expect
two things to be related, so we fool ourselves into thinking they are related even when
they are not.
Illusory Truth Effect
prior exposure increases ease of processing and is used as a heuristic to infer accuracy
Representative Heuristic
the probability that A is a member of class B can be determined by how well the
properties of A resembles the properties we usually associate with class B
Is the glasses and farmer story an example of the availability or representative heuristic
RepresentativeHeuristic
Base Rate
the relative proportion of different classes in the population
Conjuction Rule
the probability of a conjunction of two events (A and B)
cannot be higher than the probability of the single constituents (A alone or B alone)
law of large numbers
the larger the number of individuals that are randomly drawn from a population, the more representative the resulting
group will be of the entire population