Cognitive Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

What is a Case Study?

A

Case studies are in-depth and detailed investigations conducted on an individual, small group of
people or an institution.
qual + quant data
triangulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strengths of Case Studies?

A

ecological validity - case studies are documentation of an experience that has already happened to a child. occurred in ‘real life’. therefore high external validity, child’s behaviour is naturally occurring, can be generalised to everyday setting

qualitative data - use a variety of methods, observations, interviews, and experiments
therefore triangulation can be used to improve the validity of the findings. if all methods generate the same findings then data can be considered valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Weaknesses of Case Studies?

A

researcher bias - researcher may become to involved in the case, lose objectivity, recording data in subjective way.
therefore reduce reliability

unique case - variables are not controlled in a case study, case itself is unique.
therefore reliability of findings cannot be verified.

population validity - case studies are based on a single, one off unique case of a child.
therefore lack external validity unrepresentative cannot generalise to all children

retrospective data - some of the data collected can be based on past events that have happened to the child. info collected from interviews an may nit have been accurately recalled
therefore reducing the internal validity of the data gathered as there is no way to test / know what they’re saying is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Henry Molaison

A

developed anterograde amnesia after an experimental brain surgery aiming to help his epilepsy.

removed large portions of his temporal lobes including the hippocampus.

provided insight into the role of the hippocampus in forming new explicit memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Anterograde a
Amnesia?

A

Refers to loss of memory for events after an incident. therefore a person can’t store new information in their short term memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Retrograde Amnesia?

A

loss of memory access due to events that occurred or information that was learned before an injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the experimental method

A

an experiment is a study of cause and effect. differs from nom experimental methods in that it involves the deliberate manipulation of one variable, while trying to keep al the other variables constant.

in psychology try to keep all variables constant apart from the one we are looking for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the operationalisation of variables

A

need to define variables to be clear what we are changing and measuring. makes variables measurable and testable. for example memory is a variable but how can it be measured, number of items correctly recalled from a list of words after 5 minutes is an operationalised variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

confounding variables (extraneous variables)

A

only interested in influence the IV has on the DV. other aspects may influence the DV, extraneous variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 main categories of extraneous/confounding variables

A

participant extraneous/confounding variables

situational extraneous/confounding variables

experimenter extraneous/confounding variables (aka experimenter effect)

demand characteristics

social desirability bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hypotheses

A

in experiments hypothesis is necessary in order to be tested, precise testable statement of what the researcher predicts the outcome of the study will be. usually involves proposing possible relationship between two variables, IV and DV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

alternative hypothesis

A

e.g. students wil get significantly more correct answers on a test held on a Monday morning than on a friday afternoon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

null hypothesis

A

e.g. there will be no satistically significant difference in the number of correc answers students give in a test on a Monday morning compared to a Friday afternoon. any differences found will be due to chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

one tailed hypothesis

A

known as a directional hypothesis.

e.g. adults will remember significantly more words from list of 20 unrelated words than children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

two tailed hypothesis

A

known as non-directional

e.g. there will be a statistically significant difference im how many words are correctly recalled from a list of 20 words, between adults and children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

reliability

A

reliability means that if measures are taken over time then the findings will be consistent, they will be the same each time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

validity

A

validity is where a study has measured what it intended to measure, so the findings are true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Internal validity

A

whether the manipulation of the IV really caused the change in the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

External validity

A

whether the research is representative/true of all situations outside the research setting, sp can the findings be generalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

population validity

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

ecological validity

A

extent to which the setting is an everyday setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

mundane realism

A

extent to which the task is an everyday task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

objectivity

A

this means that the researcher should remain totally value free when studying, remain unbiased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

standardised procedure

A

specific procedure every participant follows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
standardised instructions
every participant receives the same instructions
26
matching participants
participants are matched based in characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity
27
environmental control
28
lab experiment
experiment carried out in a highly controlled setting, normally lab, researcher manipulates IV to see if there is a change in DV. Due to high level of control all extraneous variables are controlled for.
29
strengths of lab experiments
standardised procedure - conducted in highly controlled setting of a lab, allows a specific procedure to be written and followed the same way for each participant high control - internal validity, lab experiments conducted in highly controlled setting, extraneous variables controlled, researcher can be sure the manipulation of IV is causing change in DV. therefore cause and effect can be established to have high internal validity.
30
weakness of lab experiments
lacks mundane realism - lab experiments highly controlled setting, participants asked to complete unrealistic tasks, therefore behaviour displayed is not naturally occurring lacks ecological validity - lab experiments highly controlled setting, artificial. therefore behaviour displayed is not naturally occurring, cannot be generalised beyond lab setting, reducing external validity experimenter effect - internal validity, as laboratory experiments in a highly controlled setting means prescience of researcher may alter the behaviour of the participant, can lead to demand characteristics, pp aware they are being researched
31
strength of field experiments
mundane realism - conducted in natural setting of the participants often means task is realistic, therefore behaviour displayed is naturally occurring and can be generalised to everyday behaviour. ecological validity - field experiments are conducted in natural setting of participant, unaware they are being observed. therefore behaviour displayed is naturally occurring and can be generalised beyond the setting no experimenter effect - internal validity, conducted in natural setting lot of the time participants unaware being observed, reduced chance of demand characteristics. therefore behaviour is naturally occurring.
32
weakness of field experiments
not reliable - conducted in natural setting setting of participant. although standardised procedure can be used so all participants experience same procedure, hard to ensure that same experience is given, procedure is harder to replicate to establish consistent findings low control - internal validity, field experiments are conducted in the participants natural setting. this means it is hard to control all extraneous variables, so the researcher cannot be sure the manipulation of the IV is causing the change in the DV. therefore cause and effect cannot be established reducing internal validity.
33
order effects
when participants take part in all the experimental conditions practice effects, participants may become practiced at the test so their performance will improve fatigue, participants may become tired of the test so their performance will deteriorate
34
counterbalancing
participants need to be divided equally between the conditions and complete the conditions in different orders, for example half the participants will be tested in condition A and then condition B and then the other half will be tested in condition B then condition A.
35
randomisation
refers to the participants having a completely equal chance of being tested in Condition A or Condition B first, for example this will be determined by tossing a coin or pulling a name out of a hat
36
independent groups design
independent measures design is where different participants are used in different conditions within the experiment for example if we are trying to discover if girls are less aggressive than boys, need two seperate groups.
37
strength of independent groups design
no order effects - the participants only take part in the experiment once, so will not display the practice effect or fatigue effect. demand characteristics - the participants only take part in the experiment once so this reduces the chances of demand characteristics as the participants have less chance of guessing the aim of the study when they only do one condition.
38
weaknesses of independent groups design
twice the amount of participants are needed compared to repeated measures design which means the experiment could take longer to carry out ad cost more to complete. participant variables - as there are different participants in each group there could be individual differences between groups such as age, gender and intelligence. this means he findings could be due to participant variables and not manipulation of the IV.
39
repeated measures design
repeated measures design s where you use the same participants in all condition of your experiment. don’t have to worry about about individual differences but introduces other confounding variables such as practice effects and fatigue effects.
40
strengths of repeated measures design
participant variables are controlled economical
41
weaknesses of repeated measures design
order effects demand characteristics
42
matched pairs design
if we cannot use a repeated measures design it is sometimes possible to match every participant in one group with very similar people in the other group.
43
strengths of matched pairs design
no order effects demand characteristics
44
weaknesses of matched pairs design
not economical participant variables
45
pilot studies
small trial version of a study to test effectiveness and make improvements, helpful in identifying potential issues early.
46
peer review
peer review is a process that takes place before a study is published to ensure that the research is of a high quality, contributes to the field of research and us accurately presented.
47
cognitive approach
focuses on human thought and all the processes of knowing such and paying attention, remembering and problem solving. interested in how people take in information , how they mentally represent it and how it is stored.
48
computer processing model
compares human thought processes to the way a computer operates. acknowledges that we are both the product of our biology (hard wiring) and our experiences (programming) of both nature and nurture.
49
50
information processing model
51
multi store model of memory, Atkinson and Shiffrin
information processing occurs in three stages: encoding (input) - storage - retrieval (output)
52
encoding
converting the information we receive from our senses into something that we can represent mentally
53
storage
holding information over a period of time in preparation for when it is needed
54
retrieval
involves recovering stored information
55
three memory stores
sensory store, short term store, long term store the information we are presented with passes through these stores in order. recall occurs when things you have learnt pass from LTM back to STM
56
strengths of multi store model of memory
supporting evidence from case studies supported by chapman et al - chapman found that when they simulated a classroom environment, where participants viewed 3 different lectures on consecutive days, those participants that were given a short recall after each lecture could more accurately remember information from those lectures one month later than those who hadn’t positive applications to society - Butler and Roediger found that when they simulated a classroom environment, where participants viewed 3 different lectures on consecutive days, those participants that were given a short recall test after each lecture could more accurately remember information from those lectures one month later than those who hadn’t
57
weaknesses of multi store model of memory
anecdotal evidence - this model says we remember things by rehearsal. many things remembered without rehearsal. lots of memories do not depend on this process there may be more than one STM store - some amnesiacs only have a loss of STM for verbal items (list read out to them) and not non-verbal items (door bell ringing) reductionist - MSM says memory contains distinctively different stores. makes it easer to study memory experimentally but underplays interconnections between the different memory systems. alternative theories of memory - other theories can explain memory
58
Baddeley aim
to investigate the influence of acoustic and semantic word similarity on learning and recall in short term and long term memory
59
Baddeley sample
men and women recruited from the applied psychology research unit subject panel. participants then divided into 4 groups
60
Baddeley procedure
lab experiment, test sequential recall (right order). 4 word lists: List A - 10 acoustically similar words (man, can, cat) List B - 10 acoustically dissimilar words matched in terms of frequency of everyday use to List A (pit, few, cow, mat) List C - 10 semantically similar words (great, big, large) List D - 10 semantically dissimilar words matched in terms of frequency of everyday use to List C (hot, old, late) each list was presented via projector at a rate of one word every three seconds in the correct order. after presentation of words participants complete 6 distracter tasks involving memory for digits. participants then asked to recall the word list in one minute by writing down the sequence of words in the correct order. repeated three more times so participants had seen the word list done a series of 6 interference tasks and then recalled the words in the correct order four times in total by the end of the experiment. participants then given 15 minute interference task and then given a surprise retest on word list sequence
61
Baddeley findings
although there were fewer correct acoustically similar words (A) recalled in comparison to acoustically dissimilar words (B) especially during trial 2, by the end of the experiment recall was the same for acoustically similar and acoustically dissimilar. (no stat sig difference in number of words recalled between lists A and B). shows acoustic encoding was initially difficult but did not affect long term memory recall recall was much worse for semantically similar words (C) than for semantically dissimilar words (D) (there was a statistically significant difference in the number of words recalled between lists C and D in the final retest, such that statistically more words were recalled from list D) shows that information is encoded semantically in LTM
62
Baddeley conclusions
STM primarily makes use of acoustic encoding, as shown by the difficulties that participants had in recalling the correct order of words that had similar sounds during the early learning trials. LTM primarily makes use of semantic coding as shown by the difficulties participants had in recalling the correct order of words that had similar meanings.
63
The working memory model
instead of all information going into one single store there are different systems for different information. consists of central executive which controls and coordinates operation of two subsystems, the phonological loop and the visuo spatial sketch pad. the phonological loop is assumed to be responsible for the manipulation of speech based information whereas the visuo spatial sketch pad is assumed ton be responsible for manipulating visual images. the mode proposes that every component of working memory has limited capacity and also that the components are relatively independent of each other.
64
central executive
most important component of working memory model, little known about how it functions. responsible for monitoring and coordinating the operation of the slave systems (phonological loop, visual spatial sketch pad) and related to long term memory. central executive decides which information get attended to. for example two activities sometimes come into contact such as driving a car and talking. rather than hitting a cyclist who is wobbling all over the road it is preferable to stop talking and concentrate on driving. the central executive directs attention and gives priority to activities.
65
visuo spatial sketch pad
deals with visual and spatial information. likely that the visuo spatial sketch pad plays an important role in helping us keep track of where we are in relation to other objects as we move through our environment. limited interference to our performance when a visual processing task and a verbal processing task are performed at the same time. more difficult to perform two visual tasks at the same time same applies to verbal tasks.
66
the phonological loop
part of the working memory model that deals with spoken and written material. consists of two part: the phonological store, acts as an inner ear and holds information in speech based for for 1-2 seconds. spoken words enter the store directly. written words must first be converted into an articulatory code before then can enter the phonological store the articulatory control process, acts as an inner voice rehearsing information from the phonological store. circulates information round and round like a tape loop this is how we remember a telephone number we have just heard.
67
tulving episodic and semantic memory
tulving proposed that there are different types of long term memory stores and that each were qualitatively different in terms of the nature of stored memories, time referencing, the nature of associations between memories held in each store and the nature of retrieving or recalling memories.
68
semantic memory
general knowledge, facts and concepts that are not linked to a specific time or place. includes things like vocabulary, historical facts, and understanding of concepts e.g. knowing that Paris is the capital of France or that a cat is a type of animal.
69
episodic
this refers to memory of specific events or personal experiences that are tied to a particular time and place. it includes details like what happened, where it happened, and when it happened. e.g. remembering your last birthday or your first day of school
70
time referencing
tulving believed that episodic memory was dependant on time referencing whilst semantic memory is not.
71
spatial referencing
episodic memories are inputted at one period of time, in contrast semantic memories can be inputted in a fragmented way such that seperate pieces of information about the same topic can be learnt at different times, but stored together.
72
retrieval
episodic memories are recalled more accurately, if done so in the same context that the memory was originally made, however the accuracy of semantic memory is not affected by the context in which it is learnt/recalled.
73
independence of stores
semantic memory can operate independently of episodic memory e.g. we do not need to remember a classroom lesson about equations to be able to use the equations we learnt. however episodic memory does require access to semantic memory in other to draw in previous knowledge of people, objects and events in order to understand them. despite this apparent overlap between the two stores, Tulving argued that thy can be treated as two seperate stores.
74
Bartlett, reconstructive memory
Bartlett suggested memory isn’t passive process but constructive. suggests when we recall information we actively reconstruct the information, drawing on past experiences, previous memories, expectations and beliefs. rather like using a notepad in order to remember something we interpret an event and make brief notes on it.
75
schema
mental framework that helps us organise and interpret information. fill in the blanks. draw from past experiences
76
steyvers and hemmer aim
to investigate the interaction between semantic and episodic memory to see whether schemas for particular natural scenes aided or hindered memory for objects within these scenes
77
steyvers and hemmer sample
random sample of 49 participants from the participant pool at the university of california
78
steyvers and hemmer procedure
repeated measures design each p saw 1 set of stimuli, each set of stimuli contained 1 picture of an office, kitchen, urban, hotel, and dining area. the length of time that p saw each stimulus was manipulated in order to test differences in recall between episodic and semantic memory. p either saw stimulus for short duration (2 seconds) or long duration (10 seconds) assumed that if the p saw stimulus for 2 seconds then this would be too little time to produce an episodic memory, so recall would be reliant on semantic memory assumed that if the p saw stimulus for 10 seconds then this would be enough time to produce an episodic memory. 4 different experimental conditions: 1. 10,10,10,2,2 2. 10,10,2,2,2 3. 2,2,2,10,10 4. 2,2,10,10,10 additional control for order effects was used, randomised order that the images were presented in for each p.
79
steyvers and hemmer findings
mean number of object recalled during free recall: short duration condition - 7.75 items long duration condition - 10.05 error rates incorrect recall items would expect to see - 9% incorrect recall items wouldn’t expect to see - 18% demonstrates that memory for real life events is more accurate than for contrived scenes and shows the importance for high ecological validity in experiments. effect of prior knowledge prior to the study, 22 other p were asked to identify objects that they would expect to see in an office, kitchen, urban, hotel, and dining area. found that 55% of these items recalled wee accurate. this is a measure of their semantic memory. but in this experiment the number of objects recalled correctly was more than 80% given that the p were given pictures this is a measure of both their episodic and semantic memory
80
steyvers and hemmer conclusion
when recalling naturalistic scenes, prior knowledge from semantic memory can aid recall in episodic memory tasks. in familiar environments and the objects present are consistent with expectations and prior semantic knowledge, cognitive processing can be freed up to process novel and unexpected objects in a scene.