Cognitive Assessment: WAIS-IV Flashcards
Block Design
- PRI
- ability to analyze and synthesize abstract visual stimuli
- non-verbal reasoning
- percieve accurately, analyze, synthesize, and reproduce
- visual-motor coordination
Crystallized Ability
- previously learning information
Symbol Search
- PSI
- processing speed, short term visual memory, visual-motor coordination, visual discrimination
- attention, concentration
Picture Completion
- PRI
- supplemental
- visual perceptual, perceptual organization and attention to spatial detail
- non-verbal fund of imformation
PSI
- The PSI measures the speed of mental processing of visual stimuli using tasks that require rapid recording of simple responses with a pencil.
- VCI
- verbal reasoning and verbal concept formation
- long-term memory and crystallized intelligence
- verbal compression and associative thinking
Similarities
- WMI
- rote learning, memory, attention, auditory processing, mental manipulation, and working memory
Digit Span
- PRI
- supplemental
- visual perceptual, perceptual organization and attention to spatial detail
Picture Completion
- We have good reason to believe that the adolescent is functioning in the Low Average Range or below
Both the WISC-IV and WAIS-IV have norms for 16-year-olds. In which of the following cases would the WISC-IV be the better choice?
Before beginning to administer the WAIS-IV, you should:
- give a brief but frank account of the purpose of the examination
To determine whether an individual’s performance on a given subtest is a strength or weakness, we should compare the subtest’s scaled score to the mean scaled score of ten subtests unless:
- the difference between VCI and PRI is statistically significant and very rare.
- we can be highly confident that the best estimate of ___ score falls between LL and UL.
Confidence Interval
Figure Weights
- PRI
- supplemental
- Fluid reasoning, quanititative and analogical reasoning, visual perceptual
- Similarities
- Vocabulary
- Information
- (Comprehension)
Verbal Comprehension Index Subtests
What are the advantages to tests?
- Standardized
- Quantitative
- Economical and efficient
- Best and sometimes only feasable way of collecting data
The most important reason for probing responses is to query a response when:
- it is incomplete, vague or unclear.
If a client shows a difference between VCI and PRI scores that is statistically significant at the .05 level, we can be confident that the difference:
- is not due to measurement error.
- PSI
- processing speed, short-term visual memory, psychomotor speed, visual-motor coordination
- learning abiliity, cognitive flexibility, attention, concetration, and motivation
Coding
Information
- VCI
- ability to aquire, retain, retrieve general factual knowledge
- fund of knowledge, long term memory, and retrieval, verbal comprehension and crystalized knowledge
- Block Design
- Matrix Reasoning
- Visual Puzzles
- (Figure Weights)
- (Picture Completion)
Perceptual Reasoning Index Subtests
Without knowledge of the actual reliability estimates of the following measures, which should you expect to have the higher reliability, the WAIS-IV Verbal Comprehension Index score or the Vocabulary subtest score?
- VCI score, because longer tests are generally more reliable reliability.
The PSI measures the speed of mental processing of visual stimuli using tasks that require rapid recording of simple responses with a pencil.
- Processing Speed Index
The term most equivalent to “base rate” is
- frequency of occurrence. How rare is it that you will see that difference
- PSI
- processing speed, short term visual memory, visual-motor coordination, visual discrimination
- attention, concentration
Symbol Search
Letter- Number Sequencing
- WMI
- supplemental
- working memory, mental manipulation, concentration, short-term auditory memory
- it is incomplete, vague or unclear.
The most important reason for probing responses is to query a response when:
- Must be distinguished from psychological testing
- General targets of assessment
- Problem areas: goals of interventions
- Strengths and potentioals
- Causal variables: contributing
- Predisposing: existed prior to the problem and made the person vulnerable
- Precipitated: identifiable that starts out a process
- Maintaining: what is maintaining a behavior
- Mediating:mechanism that underlies the relationship
- Moderator: changes (increase or decrease) express of concern
- Multistep process of formulating and testing hypothesis (not very explicit) related to referral questions
- Problem clarification (what am I trying to do)
- What is the general reason for seeking the assessment?
- What answers is the source considering?
- What are the treatment and referral options?
- What are the puzzling patterns?
- Are there any special third party circumstances to accommodate?
- Are there risk factors to consider?
- Am I competent?
- Data collection (collect the data)
- What kind of data are needed to test the hypotheses
- Preliminary hypothesis related to school performance
- Ability level is congruent with performance
- How is the data collected
- Records preview
- Interview (psychosocial history)
- Client: only seeming them for 1 hour out of a week
- Collaterals: other people who have contact with a client
- Mental status exam (broad base assessment)
- Observation
- Standardized tests
- Preliminary hypothesis related to school performance
- Problem clarification (what am I trying to do)
- Interpretation (interpret the data)
- Evaluate data: is it good? Representative of typical functioning?
- Integrate data from various sources
- Draw conclusions regarding hypotheses
- Determine whether additional data is needed (not usually likely)
- Make recommendationsà come out of formulation
- Understanding, attention, effort (representativeness)
Assessment in Depth
- . More people obtain a score of 115 than a score of 145.
The Wechsler Full Scale IQ and index scores are standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Which of the following is true about the relationship between specific IQ scores and the number of people who obtain those scores, assuming a normal distribution of scores?
- only when there is a sound clinical reason to exclude WMI and PSI.
The text’s authors recommend that clinicians consider the General Ability Index (GAI) as a better summary of overall ability than the FSIQ:
Coding
- PSI
- processing speed, short-term visual memory, psychomotor speed, visual-motor coordination
- learning abiliity, cognitive flexibility, attention, concetration, and motivation
Assessment in Depth
- Must be distinguished from psychological testing
- General targets of assessment
- Problem areas: goals of interventions
- Strengths and potentioals
- Causal variables: contributing
- Predisposing: existed prior to the problem and made the person vulnerable
- Precipitated: identifiable that starts out a process
- Maintaining: what is maintaining a behavior
- Mediating:mechanism that underlies the relationship
- Moderator: changes (increase or decrease) express of concern
- Multistep process of formulating and testing hypothesis (not very explicit) related to referral questions
- Problem clarification (what am I trying to do)
- What is the general reason for seeking the assessment?
- What answers is the source considering?
- What are the treatment and referral options?
- What are the puzzling patterns?
- Are there any special third party circumstances to accommodate?
- Are there risk factors to consider?
- Am I competent?
- Data collection (collect the data)
- What kind of data are needed to test the hypotheses
- Preliminary hypothesis related to school performance
- Ability level is congruent with performance
- How is the data collected
- Records preview
- Interview (psychosocial history)
- Client: only seeming them for 1 hour out of a week
- Collaterals: other people who have contact with a client
- Mental status exam (broad base assessment)
- Observation
- Standardized tests
- Preliminary hypothesis related to school performance
- Problem clarification (what am I trying to do)
- Interpretation (interpret the data)
- Evaluate data: is it good? Representative of typical functioning?
- Integrate data from various sources
- Draw conclusions regarding hypotheses
- Determine whether additional data is needed (not usually likely)
- Make recommendationsà come out of formulation
- Understanding, attention, effort (representativeness)
Perceptual Reasoning Index Subtests
- Block Design
- Matrix Reasoning
- Visual Puzzles
- (Figure Weights)
- (Picture Completion)
- WMI require attention and concentration to information presented orally, in addition to short term, working memory
Working Memory Index
- Test
- Measurement
- Client compared to group
- Technical skills
- Compared to a norm
- Advantages
- Standardized
- Variance in the test scores reflects individual differences
- Quantitative
- Precision
- Objectivity
- Economical and efficient (time)
- Best and sometimes only way to collect some times of data
- Estimate construct like intelligence
- Construct: not directly observable
- Explanatory causal role
- No way to directly measure
- Tool for our thinking
- Assessment
- Problem-solving
- Client in problem situation
- Greater knowledge base and integrative skill
- Broader umbrella than testing
Test vs. Assessment
- WMI
- mental manipulation, concentration, attention, short and long term memory, and numerical reasoning
- sequential processing
Arithmetic
- PRI
- supplemental
- Fluid reasonng, quanititative and analogical reasoning, visual perceptual
Figure Weights
Working Memory Index
- WMI require attention and concentration to information presented orally, in addition to short term, working memory