cognition and appetite Flashcards
psychobiology view of appetite
- Eating is a consequence of physiological processes monitoring nutrient status.
- But such models cannot explain…
- Overeating and the rise in obesity
- Many eating disorders
- Etc
cognitive processes implicated in eating
· Attention:
- Responsiveness to food cues
- Awareness of physiological appetite signals
- Distraction while eating
· Memory:
- For food recently eaten
- For food liking
· Perception:
- Taste/smell
- Food liking
- Portion size
· Learning:
- Learned liking of food
- Expectations about how filling a food will be
· Decision making:
- About when to eat
- What to eat
- Healthy choices
cognitive theories of susceptibility to overeat
· Externality theory - Susceptibility to weight gain is dependent on the
extent to which internal and external signals motivate a person to eat (Schachter 1968). Predicted that obese people would be more
responsive to external signals rather than physiological (internal) appetite signals.
· Restraint theory - Individuals use cognitive processes to restrict their
intake as a consequence of weight concerns. This cognitive restriction of food intake is predicted to lead to overeating when dietary restraint breaks down. The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (Stunkard 1985) measures restrained eating.
- Emotional eating - Emotional eating occurs in response to negative emotions in an attempt to distract attention from, or alleviate, these feelings.
measuring food-related attention - foot dot-probe task
· Paired stimuli - one food-related, one control, displayed for fixed time
· Neutral “dot” probe may appear in either location immediately after visual cues
· Measure in Reaction Time (RT) to probe.
- Attentional bias for food cues: faster reaction time (RT) when probe and food cue are in same location but slower RT when locations differ.
measuring food related attention - food stroop task
Attentional bias for food cues: slower colour-naming time for food-related items compared with neutral stimuli.
Attentional bias for food-related cues have been found in obese adults (e.g., Nijs et al, 2010; Werthmann, 2011, Dekuchi, 2017) and obese children (Braet and Crombez, 2003; Yokum et al, 2011).
food attentional biases - state of play
- Nearly 30 studies on biases in obese/overweight. Meta-analyses reliably confirm no evidence of greater attention in obesity.
- Food-related biases are reliably associated with:
A) A) hunger state
B) Food intake
C) Food craving
D) Certain eating disorders
- Food-related biases are reliably associated with:
possible implications for appetite control
1) Inattention while eating could promote overconsumption (so-called “mindless eating”)
2) Inattention between meals may lead to poor awareness of interoceptive (i.e, bodily cues) relating to appetite
inattention while eating
- Eating while distracted (e.g., TV watching) consistently leads to greater intake, and poorer memory of what was consumed (Robinson et al, 2013)
- Obese children on average spend more time in sedentary behaviours and high TV viewing associated with higher intake (e.g., Crespo et al, 2001)
- Time watching TV associated with average 1.3x obesity risk in children (Ghobadi et al, 2018)
reducing eating by modifying attention?
- Mindfulness:
1) Attending to food during meals should lead to better control of intake.
2) Training awareness of appetite sensations should lead to better appetite control.
learning influences food liking
- We are born with an innate liking for sweet, disliking for bitter. All other flavour preferences are learnt.
- Flavour preferences established in childhood will track into adulthood.
- Therefore encouraging healthy eating habits in early life is very important for the prevention of adulthood obesity.
- Prenatal flavour learning (Mennella et al, 1995).
expectations influence food liking
- Expectations about sensory qualities of a food can alter liking and perceptions of a food:
- Assimilation theory:
- The expected and sense sensory experience combine so that the actual evaluation of the food is closer to the expectations than is seen when the food is evaluated without any prior expectations
- Soup label study
- Yeomans, Lartamo, Procter, Lee, and Gray, 2001
· Contrast effect: - Occurs when the expected and sensed sensory experience are very different resulting in a decrease in the rated quality of the food.
- Smoked salmon ice cream study
- Yeomans, Chambers, Blumenthal, and Blake, 2008
variety influences how liking changes
· Sensory specific satiety (SSS) - decrease in palatability of recently eaten food - decrease in desire for a food just eaten while still desiring more of other foods. For example, having enough of a main course but still having an appetite for dessert.
- Decrease in palatability is because of habituation to sensory properties of the eaten food.
sensory-specific satiety and obesity
· Role in obesity?:
· Evidence that obese people show no within meal decrease in palatability for eaten foods while also desiring other foods.
- Obesegenic environment which is full of different types of food keeps renewing desire for food.
decision making - portion size selection
· Plate cleaning occurs in 91% if meals (Fay et al, 2011)
· Thus decisions about how much we serve ourselves are important
· What do people base these portions size decisions on?