Coding, Capacity And Duration Of Memory Flashcards
Research on coding
Baddeley
Acoustic in STM, semantic in LTM
Evaluation for research on coding
Artificial stimuli
Research on capacity: Jacobs digit span
Starts at 4 digits for them to remember and then ups the number each time they get it correct. Mean span for digits 9.3 and letters 7.3
Evaluation on research for capacity
Lacks validity
Not so many chunks
Research on duration: STM
Peterson and Peterson (1959)
24 undergraduate students taking part in 8 trials
Each student given triagram to remember and 3-digit number and asked to count backwards from 3 digit number until told to stop. On each trial were told to stop after certain time. Shorter amount of time meant more correct
Evaluation on research on duration
Meaningless stimuli
Higher external validity
What 4 different types of groups did Baddeley split them into to test coding?
Group 1- Acoustically similar
Group 2-Acoustically dissimilar
Group 3- semantically similar
Group 4- semantically dissimilar
Research into capacity: Miller span of memory and chunking
Noted things come in 7’s (days, sins, musical notes) suggesting span of STM memory is 7ish. Also noted people can recall 5 words as well as 5 letters by chunking
Research on duration: LTM
Bahrick et al (1975)
392 participants from America who obtained their yearbook from them or from school
Were tested by; photo-recognition test or free recall where told everyone they remembered