Co-ownership Flashcards
Which acts deal with legal estate being held as joint tenants at law under a trust of land
s1(6) LPA 1925 -
s34(2) LPA 1925 - Trustees of land
s36 LPA 1925 - Joint tenancies
TLATA 1996 - Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act
A case that shows evidence of equitable ownership as tenants in common
Malayan Credit v Jack Chia MPH [1986]
Lessees of business presumed to hold property as tenants in common in equity
The 4 unities for a joint tenancy to exist in equity
Possession - Bull v Bull - Each entitled to possession of land and to use and enjoy it
Interest - Each tenant has the same interest in extent, nature and duration
Title - All co-owners acquire title under the same document
Time - Co-owners acquire interest at the same time
Which unity is required for a tenancy in common to exist in equity
Possession
There is no right of survivorship
Cannot exist at law - s1(6) and s36 LPA 1925
What is the equitable maxim in co ownership
Equality is Equity
Presumptions on how a property is held in equity
Joint tenants - 4 unities are satisfied and there is no express declaration of severance and parties contributed equally
Tenants in common - if 2 or more purchase in unequal shares
How can an equitable interest be severed
Written notice - s36(2) LPA 1925 - notice given to all parties and shows sufficient wish to effect immediate severance.
Destruction of 4 unities - joint tenant acts on own share
Consent of other tenants not required
2 cases showing effect of severance in equity
Re Drapers Conveyance - notice can be in any form
Harris v Goddard - served on all joint tenants
Examples of destruction of 4 unities
Sale Mortgage Bankruptcy Homicide Mutual agreement
What is the effect of a mortgage on share of one tenant
Does not affect legal title
Appear to be severance of equitable title
Can bank enforce a sale?
Anyone interested in property can apply to court for an order for sale
s14 TLATA 1996 - application to court to order sale
s15 TLATA 1996 - court consider factors including welfare of any children and interest of any lender. Purpose of trust
Likely postpone sale for no longer than a year
Name a case when an order for sale was made by a bank
Mortgage Corporation v Shaire [2001]
Court held rights of secured lender would not rank about other factors of s15 TLATA 1996
Name a case where needs of child were considered in a TLATA claim
Edwards v Lloyds TSB [2004]