Co-Ownership Flashcards
What is Co-ownership?
The form of ownership when the ownership of an undivided thing or right belongs to different persons. [Art. 484, CC]
What are the requisites of Co-Ownership?
a. Plurality of owners;
b. Object must be an undivided thing or right; and
c. Each co-owner’s right must be limited only to his ideal or abstract share of the physical whole.
What governs Co-Ownership?
a. Contracts;
b. Special laws; and
c. The CC
What are the characteristics of a Co-Ownership?
a. There are 2 or more co-owners.
b. There is a single object which is not materially or physically divided and his ideal share of the whole.
c. There is no mutual representation by the coowners.
d. It exists for the common enjoyment of the coowners.
e. It has no distinct legal personality.
f. It is governed first of all by the contract of the parties; otherwise, by special legal provisions, and in default of such provisions, by the provisions of Title III on Co-Ownership.
What is the only limitation as to the rights of the Co-owners?
Each co-owner of realty held pro indiviso exercises his rights over the whole property and may use and enjoy the same with no other limitation than that he shall not injure the interests of his co-owners. [Pardell v. Bartolome, G.R. No. L-4656 (1912)]
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to creation?
Co-Ownership:
Can be created without formalities of a contract
Partnership:
Can be created only by contract, express or implied
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Juridical Personality?
Co-Ownership:
Has no juridical or legal personality
Partnership:
Has juridical
personality distinct from partners
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Purpose?
CO:
Purpose is collective enjoyment of the thing
P:
Purpose is to obtain profits
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Disposition of Shares?
CO:
Consent of other coowners not needed; transferee
automatically becomes co-owner
P:
Partner needs to be
authorized; he cannot substitute another as a partner in his place
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Existence of Mutual Agency?
CO:
There is no mutual representation
P:
A partner can generally bind the partnership
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Death of Incapacity?
CO:
Does not result in dissolution
P:
Results in dissolution
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Formal Requisites?
CO:
No public instrument is needed even if the
object of the coownership is a real property
P:
May be made in any
form except when real property is contributed
What is the difference bet. a Co-Ownership and a Partnership as to Agreeement on the Period?
CO:
An agreement to keep
the thing undivided for a period of more than 10 years is void
P:
There may be agreement as to a definite term without limit set by law
What are the sources of Co-Ownership?
a. law
b. contract
c. intestate succession
d. testamentary disposition or donation inter vivos
e. by fortuitous event or by chance
Instances of Law being a source of Co-Ownership?
- Cohabitation: co-ownership between common law spouses [See Arts. 147, 148, 90, FC]
- Purchase creating implied trust [Art. 1452, CC] 3. Easement of party wall: co-ownership of partowners of a party wall [Art. 658, CC]
- Condominium Law: co-ownership of the common areas by holders of units [Sec. 6, RA 4726]
Instances of Contract being a source of Co-Ownership
- By Agreement of Two or More Persons [Art. 494, CC]
- By the creation of a Universal Partnership of all present property [Arts. 1778-1779, CC]
- By Association and Societies with Secret Articles [Art. 1775, CC]
Intestate Succession being a source of Co-Ownership?
Co-ownership between the heirs before partition of the estate [Art. 1078, CC]
Testamentary Disposition / Donation Inter Vivos as a source of Co-Ownership?
When a donation is made to several persons jointly, it is understood to be in equal shares, and there shall be no right of accretion among them, unless the donor has otherwise provided. [Art. 753, CC]
Exception: Donations to spouses jointly, right of accretion is presumed unless donor provides otherwise.
A donor or testator may prohibit partition for a period which shall not exceed 20 years.
What are instances where Fortuitous Event/Chance is a source of Co-Ownership?
Co-ownership between owners of 2 things that are mixed by chance or by will of the owners [Art. 472, CC]
Hidden Treasure [Art. 438, CC]
When the discovery is made on the property of another, or of the State or any of its subdivisions, and by chance, one-half shall be allowed to the finder.
What are instances where Occupancy ia a source of Co-Ownership?
Harvesting and Fishing: Co-ownership by two or more persons who have seized a res nullius thing
What are the Rights of Co-Ownership?
a. Right to Share in the Benefits as Well as Charges
b. Right to Use the Thing Owned In Common
c. Right to Bring an Action in Ejectment
d. Right to Compel other Co-Owners to Contribute to the Expenses of Preservation and to Taxes
e. Right to Reimbursement for Necessary Repairs
f. Right to Oppose Alterations
g. Right to Full Ownership of His Part and Fruits and Benefits Pertaining thereto
h. Right to Partition
i. Right to Redemption
j. Right to Participate in Administration of Property owned in common
What is the share of the Co-Owners?
The share of the co-owners shall be proportional to their respective interests. Any stipulation to the contrary is void. [Art. 485, par. 1, CC]
What is the presumtion on the share of Co-Owners?
Presumption of Equal Share
The portions belonging to the co-owners in the co-ownership shall be presumed equal, unless the contrary is proved. [Art. 485, par. 2, CC]
What are the limitations to the right of co-owners to use the thing owned in common?
- In accordance with the purpose for which the coownership is intended. – the purpose of the co-ownership may be changed by agreement, express or implied.
- In such a way as not to injure the interest of the co-ownership.
- In such a way as not to prevent the other coowners from using it according to their right.
What is the presumption when a co-owner bring an action in ejectment?
A co-owner may bring such an action without joining all the other co-owners as co-plaintiffs because the suit is presumed to have been filed to benefit his coowners. If the plaintiff/co-owner claims to be the sole owner, the action should be dismissed. [Adlawan vs. Adlawan, G.R. No. 161919, (2006)]
What contribution can a co–owner compel other to pay?
Each co-owner shall have a right to compel the other co-owners to contribute:
- To the necessary expenses (incurred for preservation of the thing or right)
If practicable, he must first notify his co-owners of the necessity for such repairs. [Art. 489, CC]
- To the taxes [Art. 488, CC]
Exception to paying necessary expenses and taxes: Coowner no longer has to pay if he renounces his undivided interest as equivalent to his share of expenses and taxes. [Art. 488, CC]
Exception to Exception: No waiver shall be made if prejudicial to co-ownership. [Art. 488, CC]
- To the useful expenses (expenses to improve or embellish the thing) [Arts. 546, 547, CC]
Not refundable unless they shall be decided upon by a majority. [Art. 489, CC]
As for the expenses for pure luxury or mere pleasure, these are not refundable for not serving purposes of preservation. [Art. 548, CC]
Is useful expenses in a co-ownership refundable?
NO.
Not refundable unless they shall be decided upon by a majority. [Art. 489, CC]
In, Co-ownership are expenses for pure luxury or mere pleasure refundable?
NO.
As for the expenses for pure luxury or mere pleasure, these are not refundable for not serving purposes of preservation. [Art. 548, CC]
What is the requirement notice for co-owners in expenses for preservation, maintenance, or repairs?
If practicable, the co-owner must first notify the co-owners of the necessity for the repairs. [Art. 489, CC]
When is notice to co-owners re necessary repairs not required?
If impracticable or where the repairs are very urgent and the other co-owners are in remote places and cannot be reached by an ordinary means of communication.
Does lack of notice even if practicable exempt other co-owners from contributing to necessary repairs?
NO.
Does not exempt other co-owners to contribute. The co-owner who advanced them has the burden of proving that they were properly incurred.