Clinical Reasoning: Logical Approach to a Case Flashcards
- What is clinical reasoning?
- Thinking and decision-making processes associated with clinical practice.
Thinking about something in a logical and sensible.
What factors come into veterinary professional reasoning?
Client
Business
Human-animal bond
Public health and society needs.
Professional code of conduct.
Local regs
Clinical reasoning available evidence.
Patient welfare.
Colleagues
Self
- Absolute basic requirements to be a good clinician.
- Why is clinical reasoning important?
- Someone who is knowledgeable.
Good decision maker. - In human med, has been estimated that a wrong diagnosis is made 10-15% of the time.
Majority of diagnostic errors are errors in reasoning i.e. when the available data has not been synthesised correctly.
Very basic framework for approaching a case.
Signalment.
Presenting complaint.
History.
Clinical exam.
Problem list.
Differential diagnoses.
Diagnostic tests.
Diagnostic results.
Final diagnosis.
Treatment plan.
Prognosis.
** A process of narrowing down possibilities.
** Many cases involve needing to loop back up framework.
- What is signalment?
– Included in horse signalment?
– Included in farm animal signalment? - Why is signalment important?
- Age, breed, sex (neuter status).
– Use e.g. racing, eventing.
– Herd info. - Aspects of signalment may be highly relevant in helping establish a diagnosis due to predisposition.
Can influence treatment or prognosis.
- What is a presenting complaint?
- Main reason the owner brought the animal to the vets.
- What to expect when taking a history from an owner.
– How can this be helped? - Vet’s responsibility in taking history?
- Info to be given in a manner that is not ordered or concise, jumping back and forth with their info. Could mean lots of key points missed out and lots of irrelevant info included.
– By being systematic in the questions that you ask. - To ask clear, understandable and pertinent Qs in a structured and methodical way.
- Things to gather info on when taking history?
- Why would you need to be able to summarise the history.
- Relevant management.
Background.
Previous medical history.
Details of current condition. - Rounds.
Discuss with colleague.
Make case notes.
Options for CE?
Can perform basic CE (head to tail).
Or can perform a more specific exam of an anatomical area or organ system based on info gathered from history and basic CE.
- What is the consequence of the history-taking and the CE not being done well?
- All the rest will be based on incomplete or inaccurate info and can lead to mistakes.
- What is classed as a problem when writing a problem list?
- Considerations when writing a problem list.
- Anything that is physiologically or anatomically abnormal that may require health care management e.g. colic, icterus, tachycardia, inappetance.
- Being clear on how things are defined in the problem list.
Whether there is another clinical sign with which the problem could be confused.
Steps of making a problem list.
- Write what is said by owner and what can be seen on CE.
- Redefine into vet terms.
- Condense down as some presentations and clinical signs can represent the same thing e.g. tacky MMs and skin tenting represent dehydration.
- Prioritise the problems. i.e. in terms of what you want to treat first / what seems most useful to help diagnosis e.g. most specific findings with quite clear and defined diagnostic pathways.
In what cases may you need to make a treatment plan before gaining a diagnosis?
In critical cases where the animal requires urgent treatment to manage its condition while waiting for a diagnosis.
- What are differential diagnoses?
- Different ways that differentials can be pursued?
- What may come with experience when making a differentials list?
- What can be done in the early stages of practice?
- A list of all the possible diagnoses that could explain what is wrong with an animal.
- Stopping at anatomical or functional level.
Or going further to an aetiological or a histopathological level. - Immediate consideration of feasible differentials based on the problem list as a whole.
- Using a diagnostic framework to help think carefully about which differentials can be discounted.
- Types of differential diagnosis frameworks.
- Organ system framework.
Anatomic region framework.
Physiologic mechanism framework.
Mixed framework.
Other framework.
Causes (mnemonic) framework.
Example of systems framework.
Diarrhoea – GI and non-GI.
GI – large and small intestines.
Non-GI – Pancreas, liver, renal, endocrine, miscellaneous.
Small intestine conditions.
Large intestine conditions.
And non-GI conditions etc.
Anatomic framework example.
Lameness in carpal region of horse.
Can be caused by soft tissue pathology, bone pathology, joint pathology, periarticular pathology.
Then build up a list of causes that can be linked to these pathology types.
Physiological framework example.
Anaemia.
Is it regenerative or non-regenerative.
Regenerative could be haemorrhage or haemolysis.
Non-regenerative could be Primary bone marrow disease or extra bone marrow disease.
Then consider all conditions linked to these possibilities.
Other framework example.
Nasal discharge.
Is it bloody (epistaxis)?
Purulent?
Mucoid?
And consider conditions associated with these types of discharge.
For horse, has it happened in exercise or rest?
Causes (mnemonic) framework.
1. VITAMINCDE mnemonic?
2. GINANDTONIC mnemonic?
- Vascular, Inflammatory/Infectious, Traumatic/Toxic, Autoimmune, Metabolic, Iatrogenic/Idiopathic, Neoplastic, Congenital, Degenerative, Endocrine.
- Genetic, Infection/Inflammation, Neuro, Autoimmune, Nutritional, Developmental/Degenerative, Trauma, h(Ormonal), Neoplastic, Iatrogenic/Idiopathic, Cardiovascular/Chemical and toxic.
What must be done while a full differentials list has been assembled?
Narrow down the list of differentials thinking about each condition and ruling in or out based on patient/case. – analytical/deductive reasoning.
Then order the list of differentials based on the likelihood or probability of each differential.
- What is a zebra diagnosis?
- Why are students more likely to make these types of diagnoses?
- Medical slang term for arriving at an exotic medical diagnosis when a more commonplace explanation is more likely.
‘When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses not zebras’ as horses are common in UK while zebras are relatively rare. - The striking and the novel stay longer in the mind.
- What does Sutton’s law state?
- You should first consider the obvious when diagnosing, suggesting that you should first conduct those tests which confirm (or rule out) the most likely diagnosis.
More likely to obtain a quicker diagnosis, and hence treatment, when doing this. This also helps to minimise unnecessary costs.