Clinical Reasoning + Endocrine Hormones Review Flashcards
premature closure
concluding evidence gathering and making a diagnosis prior to thorough reflection on all data. commonly associated with pattern recognition
false consensus
form of premature closure. offer limited analysis/information because you believe that others have reached an identical conclusion
confirmatory bias
tendency to seek or favor data that confirms one’s preferred diagnosis while ignoring or disregarding data that would disfavor the diagnosis
unintentional sequestration of data
pertinent information is unintentionally omitted by someone on the team; eg clinical sign, previous medical history, etc
illusory transactive memory system
related to unintentional sequestration of data- provides medical team with a deceptive sense of security that because you’re working with a team, someone before you got all the data that you need. “someone must’ve read the chart”
contagious illusion
respect for authority or desire for consensus allows data to be interpreted as valid by others; eg a supervising clinician states that a collection of clinical signs means the patient has _____ disease
what medical error can be summarized to “someone must have read the chart”?
illusive transactive memory system
selective perception
expectations influence your senses such that you can feel, hear or see something that you expect to hear
recency effect
the most recent events in the patient’s medical history or disease are more heavily weighted than the events that occurred earlier
what medical error can be summarized in “well the patient seems like it has heart disease, so I should be hearing a heart murmur”
selective perception
primacy effect
initial events in the patient’s medical history or disease are weighted more heavily than events that occur later
what are the 4 clinical reasoning strategies?
- pattern recognition
- arborization
- exhaustive search
- hypothetical-deductive method
availability heuristic
estimating what is more likely by what is most available in your memory: biased towards vivid, unusual, or emotionally charged examples
what are the pros and cons of pattern recognition?
pros: quick/efficient, cost-effective, common things look common, quick treatment, life saving!
cons: misdiagnosis, wrong treatment, experience matters, location matters, can lead to rush to judgement, increased morbidity/mortality
what are pros and cons of arborization?
pros: unusual differentials, need a pathway to lead to one or other, emergent situations or referrals
cons: doesn’t account for comorbidities, only as good as their designer
what are pros and cons of exhaustive search?
pros: rare disease!
cons: overwhelming, often go to as last resort, time consuming, unnecessary diagnoses
what are pros and cons of the hypothetical-deductive method?
pros: orderly, kinda ties things together
cons: slow, experience matters
what are the best reasoning strategies?
all are used, but best are pattern recognition and hypothetical-deducation
why is the clinical reasoning cycle important?
reminds you to be systematic in your approach to cases
self-awareness/metacognition is part of expert reasoning!
what strategy is our model based on?
hypothetical-deductive strategy
what clinical reasoning strategy can be summarized as
“it just looks like a case of…”
pattern recognition
what clinical reasoning strategy is summarized as “if this is true, then do this…”
arborization (decision trees)
what clinical reasoning strategy is basically the bread and butter of vet school?
exhaustive search: gather, then sift
why do we care about clinical reasoning strategies?
mistakes happen! need to be aware of what you did to lead your decisions. was it a strategy error? a cognitive error? systemic problem?