Clinical Psychology Flashcards
Aim of Classical Study
- To investigate the reliability of mental health diagnoses by seeing whether 8 pseudo-patients would be detected as really being ‘sane’
- To investigate the experience of ‘being insane’ in a mental institution
Research methodology of Classic Study
Field study and naturalistic covert (secret) unstructured observation
Describe the observers of Rosenhan’s experiment
- 3 older established psychlogists (including Rosenhan)
- 1 housewife
- 1 painter
- 1 psychiatrist
- 1 pediatrician
- 1 20-year old psychology graduate
Describe the location of the Classic study
12 psychiatric hospitals in 5 East & West Coast states in the US which varied in terms of staff:patient ratio and whether they were well-resourced or less well-resourced.
Describe the procedure for study 1 of the Classical study
- 8 pseudo-patients gained admission to the hospital by saying they heard an unfamiliar, same-sex voice saying ‘empty, thud, hollow’.
- After admission, they acted ‘normally’ towards the staff and the other patients at the hospital, e.g., engaging in conversation in the corridors
- Pseudo-patients were responsbile for discharge from the hospital by convincing the doctors that they were ‘sane’ in order to get released.
Describe the results for Study 1 of the Classic study
- None of the pseudo-patients were detected
- 11/12 hospitals admitted patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia
- 71% of staff in the hospitals ignored the pseudo-patients
- 7 patients were labelled with a diagnosis of ‘Schizophrenia in remission’, 1 with ‘manic depressive disorder’
- Length of hospital admission was 7-52 days with an average of 19 days
Describe the conclusions for Study 1 of the Classic study
The sane cannot be distinguised from the insane.
3 reasons for depersonalisation are:
1. A lack of eye contact and avoidance of patients
2. A hierarchal structure so doctors in senior positions have little contact with patients
3. Medication of patients means contact is not always necessary
What was the procedure for study 2 of the Classical study?
3 months later in a follow-up study Rosenhan sent NO pseudo-patients for admission to a hospital.
All 193 patients were real mental health patients.
Each staff member had to ‘rate’ patients one a scale of 1-10 to reflect the likelihood of them being pseudo-patient.
What were the results of study 2 of the Classical study?
41 were judged with high confidence as pseudo-patients by at least one staff member.
‘Diagnostic labelling’ of Sz is difficult for a pseudo-patient to overcome.
(Low validity of study 2 as staff were told pseudo-patients would try to gain admission).
Evaluate the generalisability of the Classical study
+ Rosenhan included both genders from a range of backgrounds
- The sample is imbalanced (5 males, 3 females) so the findings are arguably still androcentric
- Findings may not be representative for individuals experiencing mental health conditions in other parts of the USA like Central America
- Findings cannot be generalised to collectivist cultures, because America is an individualistic society that values autonomy and freedom
Evaluate the reliability of the Classical study
+ Highly reliable due to standardised procedures used by all psueod-patients
+ All patients gained admission by claiming to hear the same thing (unfamiliar same-sex voice saying ‘empty, thud, hollow’).
+ Easy to replicate
+ High inter-rater reliability because several doctors at different hospitals repeatedly gave the same misdiagnosis
Evaluate the applications of the Classical study
+ Strong applications to training healthcare professionals
+ The conclusion that ‘the sane cannot be distinguished from the insane’ has been applied to clinical diagnosis to improve type 1 (false positive) errors, by reducing the labelling of patients
+ The study contributed to reforms of the DSM-4 where the diagnosis for ‘hearing voice’ in schizophrenia was changed from a minimum duration of 1 month to 1-6 months repeatedly
Evaluate the ecological validity of the Classical study
+ Field experiment, naturalistic observation
+ The range of hospitals in the study means that the results can be directly applied to the real-life healthcare systems
+ The REAL participants (doctors and nurses) were observed in their real-life working environment, which increases mundane realism
Evaluate the internal validity of the Classical study
- Seymour Ketty (1974) criticised Rosenhan, claiming the pesudo-patients were faking an unreal mental condition, so the study does not tell us anything about how people with genuine mental health conditions are diagnosed or treated
- Rosenhan’s study is not an entirely valid measure of clinical diagnosis because the findings were based on the experience of pseudo-patients rather than real mental health patients
Evaluate the ethics of the Classical study
+ Confidentiality: all patients were given ‘pseudonyms’ and allocated pretend occupations and places of employment
+ Protection from harm: pseudo-patients were trained on how to avoid taking medication by pocketing or depositing drugs in the toilet.
+ Informed consent was given to take part in the study by pseudo-patients
- No right to withdraw because they were responsible for their own discharge from the hospital
- The longest stay was 52 days, which could have caused long-term psychological harm
- Deception: The real participants of the study (staff) did not give informed consent
Describe the 4 D’s used for diagnosis of mental health conditions
- Deviance
- Dysfunction
- Distress
- Danger
Describe ‘deviance’
Refers to statistically rare behaviours and emotions that are not the norm (disapproved of) in a society.
Describe ‘dysfunction’
Behaviour that interferes with a person’s everyday life, causing a person to not live a normal life, e.g., insomnia, unable to work, relationship breakdown.
Describe ‘distress’
The extent to which a person perceives their own negative behaviours/emotions as upsetting
Describe ‘danger’
Refers to danger to others or the individual themselves, e.g., violence towards others, suicidal thoughts or self-harm.
Evaluate ‘deviance’ in the context of a clinical diagnosis
+ Practical applications in helping professionals decide whether a patient’s symptoms warrant a clinical diagnosis
- Perceptions of deviance may change over time depending on societal norms (e.g., homosexuality used to be on the DSM but is considered normal today)
Evaluate ‘dysfunction’ in the context of a clinical diagnosis
+ Using dysfunction to diagnose a mental health condition provides a holistic way to assess someone’s mental health, as the 4 D’s cover a wide range of symptoms.
- Dysfunction is difficult to measure which reduces the internal validity. There is likely to be subjectivity in the applications of the 4 Ds. No universal consensus about what constitutes dysfunctional behaviour
Evaluate ‘distress’ in the context of a clinical diagnosis
+ Distress can be measured objectively using quantitative scales, like the Beck Depression INventory which indicates self-report scales of emotion and harm. Easily repeated, therefore reliable.
- Interpretations of distress are subjective based on clinicians’ biases.
- Cooper et al (1972) have demonstrated that New York and British psychiatrists shown the same videotaped interview came to different clinical diagnosis, NY psychiatrists diagnosed schizophrenia twice as often, whereas British psychiatrists diagnosed depression twice as often
Evaluate ‘danger’ in the context of a clinical diagnosis
+ Dangerous behaviours are easier to identify as they’re likely to be overt, which increases practical applications
- Davis (2009) argues that the model is incomplete, and a 5th D ‘Duration’ should be added. Duration defined as the length of time the person has experienced symptoms, in the case of schizophrenia according to the DSM-5, 2 or more symptoms should last at least 1 month.