Clinical Cases Flashcards
Kindelan et al., 2008
Traumatized teeth may also be at risk of undergoing more apical root resorption during treatment.
The nature and timing of the traumatic injury has a bearing on further treatment
Arias and Marquez-Orozco, 2006
use of NSAIDs, including aspirin and ibuprofen, for pain control may retard tooth movement Nevertheless, as their analgesic properties are proven, they continue to have application in orthodontic pain control.
3rd most disliked feature of an unesthetic smile?
Black triangles, Cunliffe 2009
Which is better VFR or Hawley retainer?
Outhaisavanah, 2020
VFR is better than Hawley
The ideal range of maximum insertion torque for TADs
McManus 2011
The ideal range of maximum insertion torque 5- 15 Ncm.
Effect of miniscrew placement torque on resistance to miniscrew movement under load.
Relationship between
vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Due to relatively thin maxillary cortical plate, increased MMPA patients have higher failure rate
Moon et Al 2010
Classification of maxillary tooth transpositions
Sheldon & Lina Peck 1995
international congress of anatomists and physical anthropologists was held in Frankfort, Germany, in 1882,
Frankfort plan
)mean rate of space closure of 0.81 mm per month with NiTi coils versus 0.58 mm with elastomeric chain and 0.35 with active elastomeric ligatures.
Dixon et al. (2002
reported no benefit associated with forces in excess of 150 g during space closure.
Samuels et al. (1998)
0.019 × 0.025-in. stainless steel wire has approx. 8 degrees of geometric play in a 0.022 × 0.028-in. slot
1) the inability to fill the slot because of the size difference of archwires and bracket slot,
(2) irregularities from the manufacturing process of brackets precluding proper engagement, (3) differences in the stiffness of wire alloys engaged to the bracket slot,
(4) variations between actual and reported bracket torque values.
(5) ligation modes, all of which might account for increased third-order clearance or bracket-archwire “play.”
Gioka and Eliades 2004)
Clinical research has shown relatively little impact of bracket dimensions either on treatment duration, quality of result or potential side effects of treatment
Yassir et al. 2018; El-Angbawi et al. 2018).
Stainless steel springs close buccal segment spaces as rapidly as NiTi coil springs.
(0.58 mm per 4weeks for NiTi / 0.85 mm per 4 weeks for SS)
Norman et Al 2016
Canine travels a distance of 21.99mm in the3-dimensions between the age of 5-15 years
Coulter and Richardson, 1997.
prevalence of
tooth-size disproportion of this order in an orthodontic population is around 24% in the mandibular arch and 28% in the maxillary arch
2mm of tooth size arch length discrepancy is clinically significant
(Othman and Harradine, 2007).
1- Lateral incisor root resorption by impacted 3 in normal radiographs, prevalence of 12.5%.
2- Conventional CT scanning 48%.
3- cone beam CT scanning 67%.
4- cone beam CT scanning 74%.
1-(Ericson and Kurol, 1988b).
2- (Ericson and Kurol, 2000a, b).
3- (Walker et al., 2005).
4- Alemam et Al., 2020.
*71% were developmental in origin,
*22% resulted from trauma to the deciduous predecessor
*7% were associated with cysts or supernumerary teeth
(Stewart, 1978).etiology of dilaceration
If canine not palpable at 9-10 y then investigate
Mittal 2017
Maxillary lateral incisor hypodontia : factors favoring space closure Vs space opening
Savario & McIntyre 2005
Silveria & Mucha 2016
Proclination is an effective means of reducing overbite with each five degrees of proclination leading to overbite decrease of the order of 1 mm
Eberhart et al. 1990
Andrews 1972, 6 keys to the ideal occlusion based on analysis of 120 non-orthodontic normal occlusion
– Class I molar relationship
– Correct crown angulation
– Correct crown inclination
– Absence of spacing
– Absence of rotations
-Flat or gentle occlusal curve
7th key- absence of Bolton discrepancy—-MBT
Incremental vs one time correction of increased OJ for modified twin block therapy
Banks 2004
TB is a more effective functional appliance than Dynamax in overjet reduction and many adverse effects from Dynamax
Thiruvenkatachari 2010
Dynamax made by
Nivelle Bass 2003
With An overjet more than 9mm up to 45% sustained dental injury
Less than 9mm 23% sustained dental injury
Female sex predilection
Todd & Dodd 1985
Risk factors for gingival recession
1-thin gingival bio type
2-presence of recession prior to ttt
3-gingival inflammation
4-poor OH
Which circumstances lower incisor proclination is stable?
1- after correction of class II/2(Mills1973)
2-after surgical correction of class III(Artun 1990)
3-after thumb sucking habit cessation
4-pre-existing lip trap
Contraindications of fixed appliance after functional appliance therapy
1- poor OH
2-poor compliance
3- mixed dentition
4-well aligned dental arches with no lateral open bites
Causes of late incisors crowding
1.tooth size & shape
2.mandibular 3rd molars
3. physiologic mesial drift of teeth
4.lack of interproximal wear
5.Occlusal forces
6.soft tissue changes
7.late mandibular growth. (decrease of inter canine width due to )
8.mandibular growth rotations
Mechanics for firing space without TADs
1-Class III elastics
2-adding torque to the incisors
3- post segment can be protracted individually tooth by tooth
4- archwire rounded and reduced in dimension to reduce friction locally
5- light forces
Bracket prescription after functional appliance
According to Fleming 2007 MBT
Choose a bracket prescription with increased :
-labial root torque in the lower labial segment
-palatal root torque in upper labial segment
-buccal root torque in maxillary molars if maxillary expansion took place to counteract unwanted buccal flaring .
To counteract excessive Dentoalveolar changes during the functional phase.
How to prevent relapse after functional phase? TRANSITIONAL l phase
1- overcorrection
2- deep and steep anterior bite plane
3-night time wear with occlusal trimming to allow lat open bite closure
4-continue functional phase during permanent dentition
5-headgear during early phase of fixed appliance
6-use of early class II elastics
of all the statistically significant differences we found, only 5 were deemed to be clinically significant by our definition:
1-ideal smile arc
2-ideal buccal corridor
3-maximum gingival display
4-upper to lower midline
5-cant.
Springer et Al 2011
The most significant features of an ideal smile by order of importance?
According to Springer et al 2011:
1- smile arc
2-buccal corridors
3-gingival display
4- upper & lower centerlines
5- cant
Ballista loop
Jacoby 1979
0.05%= 230 ppm= 500 microgram NaF [daily mouthwash]
0.2%= 900 ppm NaF [ weekly mouthwash]
1.1%= 5000 ppm= 5 mg NaF [high Fl toothpaste]
0.619%= 2800 ppm= 2.8 mg NaF [ medium high toothpaste]
5%= 22600 ppm= 22.6mg NaF [duraphat fluoride varnish]
Fluoride
VBA
VBA is a very brief advice from dental professional to a pt smoker not on Medical need basis
[The best way to stop smoking is with a combination of behavioural support and stop smoking aids, which can significantly increase the chance of stopping.]
Genes involved in CLP
IRF6
MSX1
FGF (fibroblast growth factor)
BMP4 (bone morphogenic protein)
Adult orthodontics differs from adolescent?
1-Medical status
2-psychological status(body dysmorphic syndrome )
3-previous orthodontic treatment (OIIRR)
4-lack of growth
5-TMD
6-Restored dentition
7-Periodontal condition
8-Treatment mechanics
9-motivation
10-esthetic demand
11-impacted canine
12-Retention
CAT, material,mm?
Aligners are generally made from poly-vinyl siloxane (PVS)48 and should be worn full- time, except when eating, and replaced every two weeks, with the aim of moving the teeth by 0.25 mm with each align
CVM
Lamparski 1972
Hassel & Farman 1991
Baccetti et Al 2005
Baccetti et Al 2008
CVM staging differences
McNamara & Baccetti2016, user guide
the shape of C3 and C4 vertebral bodies change in form from trapezoidal to rectangular horizontal to square to rectangular vertical.
C3 and C4: trapezoidal in CS1 to CS3.
C3 and C4: rectangular horizontal in CS 4.
C3 and C4: square in CS 5.
C3 and C4: rectangular vertical in CS 6.
CS 1 and CS 2 prepubertal.
CS 3 and CS 4 circumpubertal
CS 5 and CS 6 postpubertal.
CS1–ideal time to intervene with facial mask therapy combined with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is at CS 1. Maximum skeletal adaptations.
CS2– “get-ready” stage because the peak interval of mandibular growth should begin within a year after this stage.
CS3– maximum craniofacial growth velocity is anticipated.
CS4–continued accelerated craniofacial growth can be anticipated.
CS5– most substantial craniofacial growth has been achieved.
CS6– a patient can be evaluated for corrective jaw surgery or the placement of endosseous implants in the esthetic region. (most difficult stage to determine)
gold standard for determining the (continuation or cessation) is the evaluation of two lateral headfilms taken 6–12 months apart
Types of growth spurts
3types
1-neonatal(1-2y)
2-juvenile(6-8y)
3-adolescent (M12-14-F10-12)
Growth prediction methods [enumerate]
1-peak height velocity curve / growth chart.
2-simple questioning
3-CVM.
4- secondary sexual characteristics
5- scammon’s growth curve
6-dental developmental age
7-chronological age.
8-hand wrist R/G.
Lip growth
Upper lip female:20-22 mm
Upper lip male:22-24mm (males grow more than females)
Growth plateau at 18y males
At 14 y females
Lower lip growth plateau in both sexes at 16y
Age of decline of growth to adult levels?
Dimension. Female. Male.
Transverse. 12 years (maxilla). 12 years (maxilla)
intercanine width 9 years (mandible). 9 years (mandible)
Anteroposterior 2-3 years after first menstruation. 4 years after sexual maturity
14-15 years (maxilla) 17 years (maxilla)
16-17 years (mandible) 19 years(mandible)
Vertical. 17-18 years Early 20s
What measure should we take to ensure successful class II/2 Treatment?
1-lower incisors bite anterior to upper incisor root centroid
2-composite build-up of upper incisor cingulae
3-proper torque of U&L incisors
4-increase the interincisal angle
5-retention U&L bonded retainers
6-Begg retainer(wrap around)with anterior flat bite plane.
A consonant Smile arc 1st
Average buccal corridors 2nd most important feature for à beautiful smile
Moore et Al 2005
Sizes and materials of bonded fixed retainers?
Metal bonded retainer. Esthetic bonded retainer
1-Round. SS. Multistrand. 0.0175”. 1-polyethylene woven ribbon. 1mm
2-Round. SS. Multistrand. 0.0195”. 2-fiber reinforced composite resin 0.75mm
3-Round. SS. Multistrand. 0.9mm. 3-glass fiber reinforced
4-Round. SS. Coaxial. 0.0215” 4-silanised glass fibers. 0,5mm
5-Flat. Ti. Tri flex. 5-
6-Round. SS. Dead softTwisted0.0009”
8-
9-
Hierarchy of stability
*Vertical change: {AOB}——->Worst prognosis
• Transverse change: ———>Poor prognosis
• Alignment: irregularity and spacing ———Moderate prognosis
• Vertical change: deep overbite ———>Moderate prognosis
• Antero-posterior change: ———>Best prognosis
Lower arch expansion and lower incisors proclination are inherently unstable
Ackerman & Proffit 1997
No difference between Niti vs multistrand SS in alignment time ,pain,effectiveness
Want et Al 2010
1-Four-premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment protocols seem to have no
predictable effect on overall smile esthetics, meaning that if well indicated, extraction in
orthodontics does not necessarily have a deleterious effect on facial esthetics.
2-a small dental midline deviation of 2.2 mm can be acceptable by both orthodontists and laypeople
3- an axial midline angulation of 10’ (2 mm measured From the midline papilla and the incisal edges of the incisors) is already very apparent,
4- studies dealing with real smiles, buccal corridor sizes and smile arc alone do not seem To affect smile attractiveness.
Janson 2011 [systematic review]
Systematic review of mandibular changes induced by functional appliances are larger if treatment coincides with the pubertal peak in skeletal maturation.
Cozza et Al,2006
Deep and steep bite plane dimensions
A bite plane at least 8 mm deep and at an inclination of 70 degrees to the horizontal is recommended.
Bacteria in caries and periodontitis
Caries: streptococus mutants/ lactobacili
Periodontitis: porphyromonas gingivalis/ actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans(juvenile periodontitis)/prevotela intermedia/ fusobacterium.
Classification of WSL
Gorelick , 1982
Score 0: no WSL
Score 1: slight
Score2: severe
Score3: cavitated
WSL,Treatment?
1-OH improvement/removal of wire/education
2-topical fluoride
3-bleaching
4-CPP-ACP(casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate)tooth mousse
5-resin infiltration
6-microabrasion