Classical Conditioning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What assumptions do the learning theories make ?

A

All three learning theories suggest that human is learnt after birth. Collectively they believe that all individuals are born as a blank slate, this is known as a tabula rasa and every experience teaches an individual a new behaviour which in turn shapes and forms who they are. Therefore the theories believe that nurture (environmental factors ) is responsible for causing behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do the learning theories as a whole provide support for psychology as a science ?

A

The common themes between all three learning theories is that they have been developed through the use of scientific experiments on both animals and humans which have provided the theories with scientific credibility. This is because the experimental method is regarded to be an objective measure of behaviour due to the fact it uses a high level of controls to establish validity and implements standardised procedures to ensure reliability. This use of the experimental method provides strong evidence to suggest that psychology is a science. Therefore the learning as a whole can be said to give psychology its backbone within the scientific community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do the learning theories provide the use of psychological knowledge in society ?

A

Due to this credible research methodology underpinning all three learning theories they have many practical applications that are seen society. For example, psychological research can be useful to develop therapies to help individuals to develop social policies which can be helpful society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which of the learning theories was developed first and who was it discovered it?

A

Classical conditioning was the first of the learning theories to be discovered accidentally by a Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did Ivan Pavlov discover classical conditioning ?

A

Ivan Pavlov was carrying out scientific test into how dogs digest their food. To investigate this the dog’s digestion, Pavlov had externalised the saliva of the dogs which was how he was able to measure precisely the digestion of the dogs, This was achieved through the dogs undergoing a operation which involved securing a tube from the dogs salivation gland which therefore externalised the flow of saliva to the outside of their mouths. This procedure was fairly unpleasant, but this research took place many years ago and ethical considerations were not a serious issue then. By carrying out this procedure on the dogs Pavlov was able to measure specifically how much saliva the dogs were actually giving off in numerical form ( quantitive data ) since he measured amount of saliva in millimetres. Whilst carrying out this research into digestion Pavlov had a strange discovery where he found that the dogs began to salivate each time reentered the room even when he was bringing them food. It was these finding that lead pavlov to hypothesise that the dogs had learnt a new behaviour they previously did not have each time he walked through the door. With this in mind Pavlov started to work on a new behaviour. Therefore to carry this out in a scientific manner he developed an experimental test conditions to measure qualitatively if behaviour could be learnt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe Pavlov experiment ?

A

Pavlov proposed that the dogs will salivate (unconditional response ) when they see food (unconditioned stimulus ) this could therefore be paired with another stimulus ( a noise - conditioned stimulus ) in order to determine whether a new behaviour ( conditioned response ) could be learnt. Pavlov paired two stimuli together to see if he could create a new behaviour in the dogs, which was measurable in a scientific manner. Therefore he paired an unconditioned stimulus (food) with a bell (neutral stimulus) to bring about salivation (unconditioned response). Over time, Pavlov confirmed through the dogs saliva that the dogs learned to associate toe bell ( conditioned stimulus ) with the food ( unconditioned stimulus ) and therefore would begin to salivate then they heard the bell. Pavlov then was able to remove the food (unconditioned stimulus) and was able to record that the bell ( conditioned stimulus) brought about the conditioned response (salivation). Therefore a new behaviour was learnt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define stimulus ?

A

an external factor/ event which is interpreted through the senses and can bring about a behaviour ( response )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define unconditioned stimulus ?

A

A stimulus that elects an unconditioned response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define conditioned stimulus ?

A

A previously neutral stimuli that, after repeated association with an unconditioned stimulus, elicits the repose produced by the unconditioned stimulus itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define unconditioned response ?

A

a unconditioned is behaviour that occurs naturally due to a given stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define conditioned response ?

A

An automatic response established by training to an ordinarily neutral stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How generalisable is classical conditioning ?

A

Pavlov measured the responses of only dogs, which limits its generalisability as the way behaviour is learnt by dogs may not be the same way humans learn behaviour as humans are more complex cognitive functions and therefore classical conditions may not occur in humans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How reliable is classical conditioning ?

A

Pavlov research that underpins classical conditioning is deemed to be high in reliability as it used a step by step scientific methodology with step one and two checking the unconditioned and neutral stimulus and their natural responses, step three pairing the the unconditioned and neutral stimulus to get an unconditioned response and stage four was after the conditioning showing the conditioned stimulus causing the conditioned response. This used of standardised procedures allows for the research to be replicated increasing its reliability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How applicable is classical conditioning ?

A

Pavlov research has many was ground breaking research as it showed that behaviour could be learnt and therefore meaning they can be unlearnt so this lead to further research into treatment for phobias such as systematic desensitisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How valid is classical conditioning ?

A

Pavlov study is regarded to have high internal validity, this is because his research used strict levels of controls for example the use of a harness to restrain the movement of the dogs to ensure that any saliva production was due to the pairing of the unconditional and neutral stimuli. allowing for for cause and effect links to be identified as all extraneous variables are controlled.

Furthermore Pavlov research that underpins classical conditioning is viewed to be high in internal validity as it uses quantative to objectively measure the unconditioned response as he externalised the dogs production of saliva through the dogs undergoing a operation on their saliva gland to allow them to measure saliva in millimetres.

Nevertheless, the classical conditioning lacks ecological validity as pavlov research that underpins was conducted in a laboratory environment meaning the results may not show how behaviour is learnt in real environments lowing the mandane realism which intern lowers in external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How ethical is classical conditioning ?

A

Pavlov research is regarded to raise serious ethical issues related to protection of animals in research. The dogs had been operated on to ensure that the production of saliva can be studied in a numerical way, this could cause harm to the dogs. However, the cost to these animals needs to weighed against the benefits to humans from the research as important therapeutic techniques such as systematic desensitisation for phobias have been developed from classical conditioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the three other aspects of classical conditioning, pavlov identified ?

A

1) Extinction
2) Spontaneous recovery
3) Stimulus generalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe extinction ?

A

Pavlov found that in some cases the association can simply disappear between the conditioned stimulus and conditioned response. This is referee to as extinction. This can happen when when the paired stimulus is separated and this means that the learned response is no longer carried out. For example this is demonstrated through pavlov research when the bell was no longer rung when the food was presented and after a while the dogs did not salivate to the sound of the bell alone; therefore the association was extinguished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe spontaneous recovery ?

A

Pavlov also found that after extinction sometimes the association recurs for no specific reason. This conditioned stimulus suddenly produces the response that was perviously conditioned. The reappearance of a conditioned response is called a spontaneous recovery. For example this can happen to individuals after they have witnessed a traumatic experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe stimulus generalisation?

A

There is a tendency for conditioned stimulus to produce the sam behaviour to a similar situation after the response has been conditioned. This ability to generalise has an important evolutionary implication. Of our ancestors ate red berries and they made them seriously ill they may generalise this to all berries, this cautious behaviour helped their survival.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the classic study for learning theories ?

A

Watson and Rayner classic study on conditioned emotional response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why did Watson and Rayner conduct their study ?

A

Pavlov research had some shortcomings epically as it used animals as participants and the research was completed in a laboratory setting. This was a groundbreaking study which measured whether or not behaviour in humans could be learnt through the process of classical conditioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the aims of Watson and Rayner’s classic conditioning ?

A

Watson and Rayner set out to test out whether or not classical conditioning occurs in humans therefore they wanted to find out:

1) Whether they could condition fear of animal by simultaneously presenting the animal and striking a steel bar to make a loud noise to frighten the child
2) Whether the fear would be transferred to other animals and objects
3) The effect of time on he conditioned response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the sample of Watson and Rayner’s classic conditioning ?

A

Watson and Rayner selected one child, little Albert. This infant was reared almost from birth in a hospital environment and his mother was a wet nurse. Albert life was normal, he was healthy form birth and was regarded to be solid an unemotional. He was 9 months when Watson and Rayner started their study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What was the procedure of Watson and Rayners classic study ?

A

At the age of 9 months Watson and Rayner carried out emotional tests to assess his fear reactions. Initially they introduced little Albert to a white rat, a rabbit, cotton wool, and other stimuli and filmed his his reactions. He showed no fear whatsoever when shown these stimuli. The researchers also banged a hammer against a steel bar which made a loud noise. When doing this they found Little Albert made a fear response such as the his lips puckered and trembled and he had a sudden crying fit. This was the first time he had cried in the laboratory where the tests took place.
Watson and Rayner then conditioned Little Albert with the neutral stimulus being a white rat and the unconditioned stimulus as the hammer hitting a steel bar, these two stimuli were paired 5 times, after this when the rat was then presented alone Little Albert started to cry immediately, turned and started to crawl away giving a conditioned response. To ensure this response was to the conditioned stimulus of a rat and not any other extraneous variables wooden blocks were presented between stimuli and Little Albert played well and energetically providing a control in the study. Watson and Rayner continued to see whether Little Albert’s fear was transferable to different stimuli such as rabbits, dog, fur coat, cotton wool and a Santa mask by carrying out further trials. They later moved the study from a dark room to a large lecture room to test the effect different surroundings had on alberts learning of a fear response. Watson and Rayner also wanted to see if the feared response would last longer than a month so they retested Little Albert responses a year later. At the end of the study Little Albert was 1 year and 21 days old.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What were the results from Watson and Rayners classic study ?

A

Watson and Rayner found after pairing the white rat and the banging of a steel bar with a hammer five times , when the rat was presented alone Little Albert produced a conditioned response as Albert started to cry immediately and crawled away from the rat. They also found that when a rabbit or dog were presented to little Albert alone he showed the conditioned response by whimpering and bursting into tears. Additionally he also showed a far response to the fur coat, cotton wool and Santa mask however these were not as strong negative effects as shown towards the dog and the rabbit. Watson and Rayner also found after 10 days that when they presented the rat alone the response was weakened so they decided to renew it. They found that the move from the dark room to the lecture room didn’t impact on Little Alberts behaviour as he still showed a negative effect towards the conditioned stimulus. When they tested the response a month later Little Albert presented a fear response to the rat, rabbit, dog, Santa mask and fur coat, yet still played well when woods blocks were presented.

27
Q

What were the conclusions of Watson and Rayner’s classic study ?

A

A conditioned response can occur in humans after even only a few pairings of the neutral and unconditioned stimulus; but the pairing may have to repeated. The fear response can be transferred to different stimuli with similar characteristics and to different situations (change from dark room to lecture room). This process is referred to as stimulus generalisation. Thus fear can be learnt in humans through the process of classical conditioning.

28
Q

How generalisable was Watson and Rayner’s classic study ?

A

Watson and Rayners classic study was a case study investigating one individual - Little Albert. This means the results found only represent the behaviour of a 9moth old boy and therefore making the results diffract to generalise to a wider population. However this study was an improvement on the generalisability of the previous research conducted to investigate classical conditioning as Pavlov’s research was conducted on dogs, therefore it could be argued that Watson and Rayner’s classic study was more generalisable to humans.

29
Q

How reliable was Watson and Rayner’s classic study ?

A

The reliability of Watson and Rayners classic study was high as it used a step by step methodology. This methodology makes is easy to replicate in the future giving it high reliability. This can be seen in the initial pairing stage as the unconditioned stimulus (hammer banging steel bar and the neutral stimulus ( white rat) were paired 5 times. these standardised procedures allowed for Pavlov’s theory of classical conditioning to be studied in an scientific manner.

30
Q

How applicable was Watson and Rayner’s classic study ?

A

This research had many applications in the Psychological world as it provides an explanation as to how a behaviour is learnt and showed that classical conditioning can occur in humans as well as dogs. This research showed the a behaviour can be learnt through pairing of stimulus ad this can be used to help develop treatments to unlearn behaviours by breaking the association between the two stimuli. This concept is the underpinning of many psychological treatments such as systematic desensitisation.

31
Q

How valid was Watson and Rayner’s classic study ?

A

The study was conducted in a laboratory environment giving it scientific credibility. As this artificial setting allowed for strict levels of controls for extraneous variables for example the initial test of Little Alberts response to the stimuli to ensure that no previous fear response was associated with the neutral stimulus of a white rat. additionally the presentation of wooden blocks between conditioned stimuli allowed Watson and Rayner to ensure the fear response was only associated to the conditioned stimuli and not the whole environment. Therefore this allowed clear cause and effect links to be developed giving the study high internal validity and supporting the argument of psychology as a science.

However the ecological validity of this study is low as the environment was artificial and was unrepresentative of real life situations, for example humans learn new behaviours in complex environments with many stimuli being presented at once however in this study Little Albert was only presented with stimuli controlled by Watson and Rayners.

32
Q

How ethical was Watson and Rayner’s classic study ?

A

This study isn’t regarded as ethical as prior to the experiment little Albert was described as a solid and unemotional who was difficult to scare. But throughout the experiment Little Albert became more fearful of many situations. This shows that the study didn’t adhere to ethical considerations as they didn’t proctor their participants from psychological harm as Little Albert was conditioned to have a phobia and was described to whimper and cry throughout the study.

33
Q

What is fear and why do they occur ?

A

Fear is regarded to be one of the six universal emotions which every human has - the others are happiness, sadness, disgust, anger and surprise. The universal emotions are regarded to to instinctive and are emotions that we are all born with. These emotions have developed through emotionally needs (nature) and environmental factors (nurture). The purpose of the fear emotion is that it serves as a protective purpose and activates the flight or fight response. In terms of evolution the fight or flight response was effective for keeping individuals alive when they encountered a dangerous situation which required a response. With our bodies and minds alert and ready for action, we are able to respond quickly and protect ourselves. So fears serves to be purposeful and help to protect individuals to stay alive

34
Q

What are the key factors associated with classifying a phobia ?

A

In order to be diagnosed with a phobia there are some key factors which are associated with the condition.

1) The fear of the object, item or situation has to be marked and persistent which affects the person’s functioning in everyday life.
2) Exposure to the phobic stimulus almost invariably provokes an immediate intense anxiety response. which may make them take the form of crying, a panic attack, freezing or running away.
3) The object, item or situation is excessively avoided by the individual
4) the symptoms must be present for at least 6 months.

35
Q

How does classical conditioning explain the acquisition of a phobia ?

A

From ground breaking scientific research carried out by Pavlov and Watson and Rayner it was concluded that classical conditioning provided a scientific explanation as to how behaviours are learnt, In particular Watson and Rayner’s research confirmed through the pairing of an unconditional stimulus snd a neutral stimulus can bring about a conditioned response. This conditioned response can be a feared response. This feared response can be learnt through the pairing of two stimuli and over time this learnt fear can become a phobia.

36
Q

How does classical conditioning explain the maintenance of a phobia ?

A

Once a phobia has been established it can also be maintained (continued) by classical conditioning. It is likely that the pairing between the unconditioned stimulus and neutral stimulus would be renewed occasionally meaning extinction of the association coolant occur and causing the phobia to be maintained.

37
Q

How many people have phobias and how are they treated ?

A

Approximately 10 million people in the UK are thought to have a phobia. This can affect anyone, regardless of age, sex or social background. Almost all phobias can be treated and cured by therapies such as systematic desensitisation and flooding therapy. These types of treatment are generally carried out by qualified psychologists and are based upon he main principles of classical conditioning.

38
Q

Who developed systematic desensitisation and what assumptions is this treatment based on ?

A

Systematic desensitisation was developed by Wolpe a South African psychiatrist. The focus of this therapy works on the assumption that a phobia is learnt through the pairing of a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus until the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus. Therefore to treat this pairing of systematic desensitisation focuses on providing a systematic way to introduce an individual back to their feared stimulus in a step by step graduated manner.

39
Q

Describe systematic desensitisation as a treatment for phobia ?

A

This treatment uses a step by step procedure where an individual with a phobia becomes more and more familiar with the feared object, item or situation in a gradual process. This type of therapy is carried out over a period of time with the goal of of an individual being able to face their feared object, item or situation in a calm manner. Prior to the desensitisation and exposure to the fear stimulus individuals are taught how to relax their muscles and how to deal with situations if they occur. This technique which is called progressive muscle relaxation.

40
Q

Describe the step by step procedure used during Systematic desensitisation ?

A

Step 1) Build a hierarchy of the anxiety-arousing stimuli including the degree of fear experienced from 5 to 100.
Step 2) Train the client in deep muscle relaxation.
Step 3) Client work through hierarchy using relaxation techniques.
Step 4) Client confronts real fear.
These steps are performed over a number of weeks to reduce the individuals anxiety, the individual should become less fearful of the stimulus since the learnt stimulus and response links will now be broke as a new association has been learnt.

41
Q

How generalisable is systematic desensitastion ?

A

Systematic desensitisation is regarded to be an effective method to reduce individuals fears, this is demonstrated through research by Capafons- who found that it is effective for treating fear of flying. A systematic desensitisation treatment plan is adapted for every individual to cater their specific fears and emotions it can be generalised to help peoples individual cases. However systematic desensitisation does have a large focus on muscle relaxation techniques to help patients manage their anxiety when completing their headachy of anxiety arousing situations but, some people do not find these relaxation techniques useful and find they do not help mange their anxiety, therefore systematic desensitisation can be used by everyone reducing its generalisability.

42
Q

How reliable is systematic desensitisation ?

A

A straight of this treatment therapy is its step by step methodology which uses an hierarchy in anxiety arousing situations to approach reducing a patients fear gradually. This is important because the step by step methodology allows for standardised procedures for patents so the treatment can be replicated and has high reliability.

43
Q

How Applicable is systematic desensitisation ?

A

Systematic desensitisation is the preferred treatment within the NHS to treat phobias that are severely impacting an individuals life. This treatment is very useful for patents with phobias as if successful it can help people day to day lives shown by Capafons classic study who found it was a effective way of treating phobias of flying.

44
Q

How valid is systematic desensitisation ?

A

Systematic desensitisation is based upon scientific research with methodology that includes strict controls and the research established clear cause and effect links through the use of a laboratory study. Giving the implications of this research, like systematic desensitisation high internal validity.
However the validity is limited as it can be seen to be reductionist as it based on classical conditioning which is reductionist as it ignores many other factors that could cause phobias such as complex cognitive processes. reducing the validity as the theory underpinning it does not provide a holistic explanation of how behaviours including phobias are learnt.

45
Q

How ethical is systematic desensitisation ?

A

Systematic desensitisation is regarded to be ethical as it treats people through gradual exposure to the feared stimulus with the individual agreeing to the exposure prior to it. Furthermore individuals are involved in planning the treatment they can give informed consent.

46
Q

Describe Flooding Therapy ?

A

Flooding is another example of exposure therapy, Flooding is similar to systematic desensitisation since it is also based upon the idea that phobias are learnt though the principles of classical conditioning. Flooding involves exposing an individual to their feared stimulus all at once. However flooding uses the idea that a phobia response is caused by an alarm reaction and that these emotions only have certain longevity before these emotions subside. The idea is based upon biological principles that if an individual sees a feared object then that will cause the alarm reaction for a certain length of time and then it would have to subside. The alarm reaction is a biological reaction giving the organism energy to engage in the fight or flight response. Blood sugar is made available and other activities such as digestion tends to cease as the body goes into high alert stage. As the body uses up all its blood sugar then it will start to calm. Therefore carrying out Flooding therapy an individual is usually placed into a feared environment without any skills of relaxation. It is generally thought that if flooding works it is because an individual has has managed to get through what they image to be worst situation and the worst will not occur again and so they are prepared to deal any situation related to the phobia.

47
Q

How generalisable is Flooding Therapy ?

A

Flooding similarly to systematic desensitisation is regarded to be an effective method to reduce individuals fears and can be used on a number of different phobias so it can be generalised to lots of other fears.

48
Q

How reliable is Flooding Therapy ?

A

Flooding therapy can be stressful and traumatic but it is a quick because the alarm reaction cannot be maintained for a very long time as the body biological has to calm down once it uses up all of the blood sugar. Due to this quick technique it can ensure that it is reliable so therefore standardised procedures which others can follow therefore it has a high level of reliability.

49
Q

How applicable is Flooding Therapy ?

A

Flooding therapy is very useful for treating phobias and anxieties as it is based on the alarm reaction. however its implications is limited to only treating phobias and anxiety and can’t be used for other mental health difficulties.

50
Q

How valid is Flooding Therapy ?

A

Flooding Therapy is based upon scientific principles of classical conditioning which was developed based upon research conducted in Laboratory setting with objective measurements and strict controls to ensure clear cause and effect links proving phobias through the pairing of an unconditioned and neutral stimulus. Therefore flooding therapy is high in validity.

51
Q

How Ethical Flooding Therapy ?

A

A weakness of flooding therapy as a treatment participants must experience an alarm reaction and undergo a frightening exposure to their feared stimulus without any relaxation techniques. Therefore it doesn’t protect participants form harm and are likely to experience extreme stress. This can be seen in Wolpe (1973) case study on a girl who was affirmed of cars who under went flooding therapy by driving around in a car for hours. Although the participant eventually calmed down she was hysterical for a large amount of time and showed very clear signs of distress.

52
Q

What is the contemporary study in learning theories titles has who conducted it ?

A

Capafóns et al (1998) conducted a studied titled systematic desensitisation in the treatment of fear of flying.

53
Q

What is the aim of Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of systematic desensitisation as a treatment programme to treat s fear of flying.

54
Q

What was the sample of Capafóns et al Contemporary study ?

A

41 participants were recruited via a media campaign which was set up by the research team which informed them of personal intervention programmes aimed at treating fear of flying. The participants were split into two groups, the treatment group and the waiting control group. The treatment group consisted of 20 participants, 8 males and 12 females, mean age of 29 years old. The waiting control group consisted of 21 participants, 9 males and 12 females with a mean age of 34 years old.

55
Q

What materials were used in Capafóns et al Contemporary study ?

A

The following materials were used:

1) General diagnostic information on fear of flying (psychometrics). This was carried out to obtain data about patients life history and aspects of their fear of flying.
2) Fear or flying scales (Psychometrics) measures the degree of anxiety perceived in relation to different flight situations.
3) Scales of Expectations of Danger and Anxiety. These two measure the frequency of various catastrophic thoughts and the occurrence of different physiological manifestations that may present themselves in a flight situation.
4) Videotape of plane trip, this was a video made from a subjective perceptive about a trip by plane, which begins with the traveller packing their bag ad ends with the plane landing at its destination.
5) Psychophysical recording instruments such as a cardioback that measures heart rate.

56
Q

What was the method used for Capafóns et al Contemporary study ?

A

All of the participants were interviewed individually by members of the research team. In this interview subjects completed the general diagnostic information on fear of flying and in subsequent session the rest of the measures were take using the self report method.
Participants were then called back individually to watch the videotape of the plane visit whilst undergoing psychophysical measurements. The temperature of the room was maintained at 22.5°C, the participant sat in an arm chair which was positioned 1.8 metres form the television. Before the viewing of the video participants took part in a habitation session where the participants were aquatinted with the application of the psychophysical recording instruments. The participants responses were measured for a three-minute period on the absence of phobic stimulus. The patient then proceeded to catch the video and as told to fell as involved as possible. At the end of the video another appointment was made for the presenting treatment in the case of the treatment group and the next assessment session for the control group. In either case the interval between the first and second was approximately eight weeks for all the measures . The participants which were receiving the treatment had two one hour sessions per week as part of a standardised individual desensitisation programme of minimum of 12 and maximum 15 sessions. In addition to training in techniques of breathing progressive relaxation and imagination. After 8 weeks both groups were invited back to retake the self report and the simulated videotape see if their fear had deteriorated.

57
Q

What was the results from Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

1) The waiting group in the self report scales, interview responses and physiological reactions in the simulations. showed that the mere passing of time doesn’t lead to quantitative changes in any of the dependent measures.
2) For the treatment group the self report scales carried out before and after for the same dependant variables indicate significant changes and reduction in fear responses. Therefore indicating that the treatment is effective for those with a fear of flying.
3) Before the treatment the waiting control group and the treatment group were similar on the self-reported fear levels and the psychophysical measures.
4) The results after the therapy showed their was a significant difference between each the treatment group and the waiting control group for practically all the variables analysed except for palm temperature.

58
Q

What was the conclusions from Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

From the results of this study it was concluded that the intervention programme has outlined guarantees for its uses in treatments for decreasing or even eradication fear of flying. Therefore the process of systematic desensitisation in an effective way of treating phobias of flying. However they also concluded that systematic desensitisation is not completely dependable as 10% of the participants who were treated showed no reduction in fear. Therefore systematic desensitisation may to be suitable for everyone.

59
Q

How generalisable was Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

A weakness with this study is that its not generalisable, The sample size of 41 participants with only 20 undergoing the treatment condition, furthermore the sample was self-selects so it maybe biased as people who volunteered for the study made up the sample and they may have really wanted to secured so they may have responded well to systematic desensitisation as they want it to particularly well. Due to these to reason it is difficult to generalise the results to a wider population.

60
Q

How reliable was Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

Capafóns et al used a number of standardised procedures throughout the study for example each participant watched the video at exactly 1.8 metres away from the television and in a room that was exactly 22.5°C. These procedures within the methodology mean that that the study can be replicated for all 41 participants and in future research increasing the reliability.

61
Q

How applicable was Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

This study has many practical applications, as the results show the effectiveness in helping people who have a fear of flying . This means that systematic desensitisation can be used to treat people with phobias, however this therapy doesn’t work for everyone as 10% of the treatment group found no improvement in their fear for flying.

62
Q

How valid was Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

A strength of this study is its use of strict controls to allow for clear cause and effect links to be established for example a waiting control group was used to compare the finding of the treatment group to ensure that the results shown were due to the treatment and not simply the idea of time passing, allowing the research to accurately identify the improvements made due to the systematic desensitisation improving the internal validity of the study.

Furthermore This study used quantitative measures to measure levels of anxiety, this allows for objective data to be produced an analysed giving the study scientific credibility and intern high internal validity. this can be seen in the psychometric measures such as participants heart rate and muscle tension being monitored when watching the subjective perspective videotape. But the use of many self report measures such as the Scales of expirations of danger and anxiety lower the validity as they could have been effected by demand characteristic or socially desirable answers. Despite this concern in the results it was seen there was high concurrent validity between the self report measures and the psychometric measures as they both showed a improvement in the treatment group after the therapy but no changes in the waiting control group.

A weakness of this study is the use of a laboratory setting with artificial tasks, this is a weakness because it reduces the madden realism of the study as the participants were not exposed to their fear of flying only a simulation through a subjective perspective videotape lowering the ecological validity of the results as the researchers do not know the the results given represent hoe the participants would feel a real plane.

63
Q

How ethical is Capafóns et al contemporary study ?

A

Another strength of this study is that all the participants gave informed consent to complete the study as well as being supported throughout the procedure by a team of researchers. This is a strength because this means the ethical principles were upheld which is important for psychology reputation in society as a science.