Classic Study: Loftus and Palmer (1974) Flashcards
What were the aims of Loftus and Palmer’s study?
- To investigate the accuracy we remember the detail of a complex event, like a traffic accident
- To test the hypothesis that the language used in eye witness testimonies can alter memory, specifically the role of leading questions
Who were used in the sample?
45 American students
What type of method was used?
Lab
Briefly describe the procedure of Loftus and Palmer
- 45 American students were split into 5 groups
- They were shown 7 clips of 5-30 seconds each of a staged traffic accident that were taken from the Evergreen Safety Council and Seattle Police
- After watching the clips the ppts received a questionnaire asking them to give an account of the accident as if they were an eye witness
- They were then asked the critical question of: “About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
- The verb hit would be swapped with smashed, collided, bumped, or contacted depending on the condition the experimental group were in
- The clips were counterbalanced as the order was different for each group
What was the IV and DV of the first study?
IV = the verb used in the critical question (smashed, collided, bumped, hit, contacted) DV = the estimated speed of the car in mph
What were the results of Loftus and Palmer’s first study?
Smashed - 40.5 mph Collided - 39.3 mph Bumped - 38.1 mph Hit - 34.0 mph Contacted - 31.8 mph
Describe the conclusion of Loftus and Palmer’s first study.
- The verb used in the critical question influenced the speed estimate
- The more powerful verbs that suggested higher speeds before impact received higher estimates
What 2 reasons did Loftus suggest could be the reason for why leading questions affect memory?
1) Distortion - the verbal label attached to the event could have led to the ppt cognitively changing their memory through re-evaluation of what they already know
2) Response bias - a type of demand characteristic whereby the ppt is not sure of the exact speed and therefore adjusts their estimates to fit in with the expectations of the questions
What were the aims of Loftus’s follow up experiment?
- To investigate the origin of the different speed estimates
- To investigate whether estimates were due to demand characteristics of response bias or memory alteration
Who were used in the sample of the second study?
150 students
What type of method was used in Loftus’s second study?
Lab
Briefly describe the procedure of the second part of this classic study.
- 150 students were split into 3 equal groups
- They were shown a 1 min film of a multiple car accident that lasted 4 seconds
- At the end they were given a questionnaire asking them to describe the accident and then answer 10 questions about it that were asked in a random order
- They were asked the critical question of: “About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
- The verb was changed to smashed or hit, for two conditions, the third were not asked for a speed estimate
- 1 week later the ppts returned and were asked: “Did you see any broken glass?” even though there wasn’t any
What was the IV and DV of the second study?
IV = whether they were asked if the car smashed, hit, or weren't asked at all DV = the speed estimate and whether or not they answered yes/no to there being any broken glass
What were the quantitative results of Loftus’s second study?
Smashed - 16 said YES, 34 said NO
Hit - 7 said YES, 43 said NO
Control - 6 said YES, 44 said NO
Were the results significant?
Yes because those who estimated speed in smashed condition averaged 10.46 mph whereas those in hit averaged 8 mph which is significant due to t(98) and having a difference of 2 at p<0.05.