Class differences in achievement - INTERNAL Flashcards

1
Q

Labelling

A

To label someone is to attach a meaning or definition to them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Labelling studies

A

Teachers label their pupils on the basis of stereotyped assumptions about their class background, labelling WC negatively and MC positively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who studied labelling and what was it called?

A

BECKER- interactionist study of labelling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Becker’s interactionist study of labelling involve?

A

INTERVIEWS WITH 60 CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS. He found that they judges pupils on how closely they fitted an image of the ‘ideal pupil’.
Pupil’s work, conduct and appearance were key factors influencing teacher’s judgements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did DUNNE and Gazeley from their study of Labelling in secondary schools

A
  • Interview with nine English state secondary schools.
  • Found that teachers ‘normalised’ the underachievement of WC pupils, seemed unconcerned by it and felt they could do little about it, whereas they believed they could overcome the underachievement of MC.
  • Teachers labelled WC parents as uninterested, but labelled MC parents as supportive.
  • This led to class differences. Setting extension work for underachieving MC, but entering WC for easier exams.
  • Teachers also underestimated WC pupil’s potential and those who were doing well were seen as ‘overachieving’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RISTS STUDY OF AMERICAN KINDERGARDEN - Labelling in primary schools

A
  • Teachers used info about childrens home background and appearance to place them in separate groups.
  • Those who teachers labelled as ‘fast learners’ were labelled as ‘tigers’, MC - neat and clean appearance. They were seated nearest to the teacher and showed them great encouragement.
  • Other groups such as ‘clowns’ SEATED FURTHER AWAY. Lower levels books given to read, fewer chance to prove ability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SELF - FULFILLING PROPHECY

A

A SELF FULFILLING PROPHECY is a prediction that comes true simply by virtue of having it made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

TEACHER’S EXPECTATIONS - ROSENTHAL AND JACOBSON STUDY OF CALIFORNIA OAK COMMUNITY SCHOOL -

A
  • Researchers tested the pupils , picked 20% of pupils randomly and told the school that these 20% are ‘spurters’ falsely. A year later they found out that spurters have made the most significant progress.
  • The teachers had then conveyed these beliefs about the pupils through the way they interacted with them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STREAMING

A
  • Streaming involves separating children into different ability groups or classes called ‘streams’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Becker say about streaming?

A

WC children are more likely to find themselves put in a lower stream. Once streamed it is usually difficult to move up to a higher stream. Children ‘get the message’ that teachers mark them ad ‘no-hopers’.
This is opposite to MC PUPILS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Gilborn and Youdell say about Streaming and the A-C economu?

A
  • Teachers use stereotypical notions of ‘ability’ to stream pupils (WC AND BLACK) - entered in lower tiers GCSE - widens class gap in achievement.
  • Publishing league tables create an ‘A-C ECONOMY’ - system which schools focus time and effort on pupils as having potential to get 5 grade C’S to boost the school league table position.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the A-C economy produce an educational triage?

A
  • Teachers use a stereotypical view of WC pupils as lacking ability. This produces a self fulfilling prophecy and failure.
  • The need to gain good league table position drives the ET, for instance putting WC in lower streams.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pupil subcultures

A
  • Group of pupils who share similar values and behaviour patterns, emerge due to labelling and reaction to streaming.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is lacey differentation?

A
  • Process of teachers categorising pupils according to how they perceive their ability, attitude.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is streaming?

A

A form of differentiation, it catergorises pupils into separate classes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What’s polarisation?

A
  • A process in which pupils respond to streaming by moving towards one of two opposite poles or extremes, e.g. pro-school/anti-school subculture.
17
Q

Pro school subculture

A
  • Pupils placed in higher streams who are committed to the values of school.
18
Q

Anti school subculture

A
  • Low streams, low self-esteem… the school has undermined their self-worth by placing them in a position of inferior status.
  • So pupils form an anti-school subculture as a means of gaining status among their peers ,e.g cheeking the teacher, smoking…
19
Q

What does Ball say about abolishing streaming?

A
  • When school abolished banding, the basis for pupils to polarise into subcultures was largely removed and the influence of the anti-school subculture declines.
20
Q

What does Ball’s study show?

A
  • Show that class inequalities can continue as a result of teacher’s labelling even without the effect of subcultures and streaming.
21
Q

The variety of pupil responses

A

PETER WOODS-
INGRATIATION - being the ‘teachers pet’
RITUALISM - going through the motions and staying out of trouble
RETREATISM - daydreaming and mucking about
REBELLION - rejection of everything the school stands for

FURLONG - many are not committed permanently to any one response, may move between diff types of response , acting diff in lessons with diff teachers.

22
Q

Criticims of labelling theory

A

MARXISTS- ignore the wider structures of power within which labelling takes place. Labelling theory blame teachers, but fails to explain so.

  • They also argue that labels are not merely the result of teacher’s individual prejudices, but also the fact that they work in a system that reproduces class divisions.
23
Q

Pupil class identities and the school - Habitus

A
  • A group’s habitus is formed as a response to its position in the class structure.
  • The MC has power to define its habitus as superior and to impose it into education system, so WC regarded as inferior.
24
Q

PCI and the School - Symbolic capital and violence

A
  • MC PUPILS TASTES AND PREFERENCES gain SYMBOLIC CAPITAL, which is recognised from school and have a value.
  • BOUDIEU- this leads to SYMBOLIC VIOLENCE by defining WC taste and lifestyle as inferior.
  • ARCHER- WC PUPILS ‘losing yourself’ would have to change the way they talked and presented for success.
25
Q

Nike identities

A
  • The symbolic violence led them to seek alternative ways of creating self-worth, status and value, for instance wearing brands.
  • But it leads to conflict with school’s dress code.
  • ARCHER ET AL - NIKE identities expresses their positive preference for a particular lifestyle. SO they choose to reject school as it does not fit in with their identity.
26
Q

W/C Identity and educational success

A
  • INGRAM - wc identity inseparable from belonging to WC locality. IT gave boys sense of belonging.
  • However the WC boys felt a pressure to ‘fit in’ when at grammar school as there was a tension between the habitus of their WC neighborhood and that of their MC school.
27
Q

Class identity and self exclusion

A
  • BOURDIEU - WC students exclude themselves from elite univerisites because they believe they will not ‘fit in’.
  • EVANS - WC girls had strong attachment to their locality. Self exclusion from elite or distant uni narrows the option of many wc pupils and limit their success.
28
Q

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS (interrelated)

A
  • WC HABITUS conflict with schools MC HABITUS - leads to SYMBOLIC VIOLENCE.
  • WC RESTRICTED SPEECH CODE can be labelled by teachers leading to SELF FULFILLING PROPHECY.
  • POVERTY - may lead to bullying by peer groups.
29
Q

Interactionist argue that schools create inequality through labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy, educational triage, streaming and polarisation into pro and anti school subcultures.

A
  • Conflicts between school habitus and pupils identities may lead to symbolic violence and self exclusion.