class differences Class- paper 1 Flashcards
Hyman (1967)
working-class put less emphasis on education. Working class values ability stability and initiate economic benefit over status when choosing employment. Working class believe there are limited opportunities for personal achievement for themselves. They have “self-imposed barriers” between them selves and education
Gewirtz (1995)
Parental choice impacts educational achievement. Looked at 14 schools in London. Lower class are less likely to find better schools. Middle class parents find the best schools for there children to go to have more choice going to a better school puts children in a ‘good’ position better education
Privileged skilled workers
Mainly middle class profession, culture capital, good understanding of admission process (time to visits schools research options) economic capital afford to move children around transport.
disconnected local choosers
working class with restricted economic/ cultural capital don’t grasp admission procedures less aware of choice more concerned with safety and quality than league tables limited funding restricted ability to travel
Semi skilled choosers
Working-class conditions for children also find difficult to navigate rely on opinions of others frustrated at inability to get children into preferred schools
Internal factors
External factors 
Factors within the education system like how teachers and people interact with each other
Factors outside the education system like Homelife family background why does society
Middle class
Working-class
Non-manual occupations like doctors teachers managers business owners
Manual occupations skilled workers- plumbers semiskimmed- workers lorry drivers unskilled workers- cleaners
Parents
Douglas- working-class parents put less emphasis on education therefore don’t push the children to be ambitious and take less interest in education parents visit the schools/parents evenings.
Leon feinstien- Parents own education is the most important factor affecting children’s education middle class better educated parents put their children an advantage.
Better educated parents have better income.
Sugarman working class subculture
sugarmman- argues wc have 4 features that act as a barrier to education
fatalism (they have a fatalist Mentality believe they cannot do anything to change there situation)
collectivism (I want to be part of a group rather than succeeding individually)
Immediate gratification (Pleasure now rather than waiting for Quality rewards later)
Primary time orientation (Present in the moment more important in future don’t have long term goals)
WC parents pass on beliefs through primary socialisation resulting in underachievement. WC jobs are less secure, have no career structure where individuals can advance,
MC jobs are more secure have more change to earn more, successful
a group who attitudes and values differ to those in mainstream culture
language
Feinstine- high qualified parent use self praise wich improves self confidence. Came up with speech roles identifies how different backgrounds speech and language and terms they use.
restricted- WC limited vocab, short sentences
Elaborated code- MC more vocab, long complex sentences
language quality impacts academic achievement achievement as it advantage those who use it lice MC as it is use in the education system. the way parents communicate with there children affects there intellectual development.school use MC culture like language, dress code and cultureal knoledge
culture capital how it benifits MC Pirre Bourdieu
Emerged in the USA in the 1950s working-class underachievement due to their own deficiencies and the deficiencies of parents.
pirre Bourdieu- culture capital refers knowledge, attitude, values, language, tastes and abilities of MC. MC culture is a capital as it gives them an advantage. MC children are socialised to abstract ideas and experiences. therefore they are more likely to understand the education system and succeed.
criticisms functionalists say education is meritocratic
who tested the ideas of Bourdieu
sullivan- conducting a survey on 465 pupils across four different schools. student with higer culture capital at home archive better in education. But culture capital isn’t the only impact. the children who did best were mc children of graduates
culture capital in WC
education is now equal favours dominant MC. WC feels school devalues there culture as rough and inferior there lack of culture capital leads to exam failure. WC get the message education is not for them so truant and dont put effort into there education. school use MC culture like language, dress code and cultural knowledge This means WC will be at a disadvatange to MC as they have less culture capital
how they over came cultural depravation
sure start- introduced by new labour government plan to tackle child poverty and social exclusion of children in deprived ares. brought in a range of services to support families by enhancing development and life changes os children under 5. health services, parenting support, early learning. The funding was taken out of this by Tori government (conservative) but has been proven to be effective.
Education action zones- introduced by labour 11998. brought together a group of schools with parents, community groups and small businesses and aimed to attract sponsorships and investments from the private sector. wasn’t a good policy as there weren’t very may sponsorships and archived disappointing achievements.
Education triage
this is a type of sorting. schools categorizes pupiles in 3 types:
1. those who are guaranteed to pass left to get on with it
2. those with potential to pass will be helped to get a C/ better
3. hopeless doomed to fauile
teachers do this based on stereotypes WC are hopeless cases this creates a self fulfilling prophecy and failure.