Class difference in achievement Flashcards
Cultural Factor
these include class differences in norms and values acquired through socialisation, attitudes to education, speech codes etc.
Material Factor
these are the physical necessities of life, such as adequate housing, diet and income.
Cultural Deprivation Theory
‘culture’ refers to all norms, values, beliefs, skills and knowledge that a society or a group considers important.
Different classes socialise their children differently and this may affect their achievement.
Factor of Cultural Deprivation Theory: Intellectual Stimulation
working-class parents are less likely to give their children educational toys and activities that will stimulate their thinking and reasoning skills- this effects their intellectual delevopment.
Factor of Cultural Deprivation Theory: Language
working-class use restricted code: less analytic and more descriptive, limited vocabulary, simple sentences and more gestures. This is particularistic. middle-class use elaborated code: more analytic, with wide vocabulary and complex sentences. it is universalistic. ( elaborated code is the one used in education, middle class has an advantage) BERNSTEIN (1975) distinguished between elaborated and restricted speech codes.
Factor of Cultural Deprivation Theory: Parent’s education
Parenting style: educated parents emphasise discipline, high expectations. less educated parents’ inconsistent discipline means their children have poorer motivation.
parent’s educational behaviour: educated parents are more aware of what helps their Childs progress
language: the way in which their parents communicate affects children’s cognitive development.
use of in come: educated parents spend their income to promote children’s development.
FEINSTEIN (2008) argues parents own education education most important factor effecting achievement- middle class have advantage.
Factor of Cultural Deprivation Theory: working-class subculture
three aspects of working-class subculture that contribute to under-achievement.
- immediate gratification: wanting rewards not rather than wanting to make sacrifices and work hard to receive future rewards.
- fatalism: a belief “whatever will be, will be”- working class children don’t believe they can impress their position through their own individual efforts (social mobility)
- low value on education: working class don’t value education, they don’t believe they’ll benefit from it so they don’t try- working class parents show less interest in their children’s education and give them less support.
Criticisms of Cultural Deprivation Theory
- it ignores the importance of material factors such as poverty.
- it ignores the impact of school factors, e.g negative labelling by teachers
- it blames the victim for their failure- can be argued that the working class are not culturally deprived- they simply have a different culture from the school, puts them at a disadvantage.
Material Deprivation
material deprivation or poverty can cause working-class under-achievement because of factors such as:
- poor housing- overcrowding or cold and damp means pupils cannot complete homework. homeless or temporary accommodation may mean constant moves and changes of schools.
- poor diet- lead to illness, absences from school, lack of concentration in class due to lack of nutrients
Material Deprivation: Financial costs of education
- poorer families can afford fewer educational opportunities- trips, computers, uniform- children may be bullied for clothing or lack of participation in fashion trends. tuition fees also, middle class children are more likely to attend university
Material Deprivation: Cultural capital theory
this approach combines material & cultural explanations. marxists BOURDIEU(1984) argue middle class pupils are more successful because their parents possess more capital or assets. these being: economic capital: wealth that middle-class families own cultural capital: attitudes, values, skills, knowledge of the middle class
School factors and achievement
factors and processes within schools and the education system influence class difference in achievement
interactionist focus on small interactions between teachers and pupils
they identify a number of causes of under-achievement
-labelling
-self-fulfilling prophecy
-streaming
-pupils subculture
Labelling
labels - definitions we attach to someone to make sense of them BECKER (1961) Argus teachers label middle-class children as 'ideal pupils' and prefer to teach them rather then the working class children.
The self-fulfilling prophecy
prophecy- prediction made about someone or something.
the key feature of a self-fulfilling prophecy is that it simple comes true.
teachers can create SFP through the labels they attach to pupils.
‘what teachers believe, pupils achieve’ - while teachers believe middle-class pupils to be bright, working class pupils are likely to be labelled negatively thus resulting In negative outcomes.
Streaming
streaming- extreme, institutionalised form of labelling.
works by putting pupils of similar ability into sets, or streams for all subjects.
LACEY(1970) describes streaming as ‘differentiation- separating sheeps from goats- educating them differently.
DOUGLAS found IQ of top sets students increased and IQ of bottom set students decreased.
student placed in lower streams may be denied access to same curriculum.