class and achievement- internal factors Flashcards
LABELLING
is the process of attaching meanings to individuals or groups.- based on stereotypes of person’s class, gender and ethinicity
Internal Factors
factors within schools affecting the educational achievement of pupils such as influence of interactions between pupils and teachers
Interactionism
- sociological perspective that developed labelling theory.
- study based on interactions between individuals, how they label and how the label affects the behaviour of labelled individuals.
Becker
- interviewed 60 high school teachers in chicago.
- teachers have image of ‘an ideal pupil’ and they judge pupils on how closely they fit the ideal.
- m/c students tend to be the closest to teachers’ image of an idea pupil, w/c pupils are seen as badly behaved putting them further away from the ideal image.
CRITICISM of Becker- Hempel-Jorgensen
studies by hempel-jorgensen shows that teachers have different notions of an ideal pupil and is not always linked to class background of the pupil e.g in mainly w/c school which had lot of behavioural problems, teachers saw the ideal pupil as quiet and obedient.
Dunne and Gazeley
- studied 9 state schools in England and found that teacher labelling leads to underachievement of w/c students
- teachers ‘normalise’ the underachievement of w/c a and are unconcerned about it and feel they can’t do anything about it- because they believe that w/c home background is major factor holding back their progress
- leads to different treatment of underachieving m/c and w/c students
Rist
- studied US kindergartens
- the judgement about where to place the students on table was made by teachers based on the information the teacher had about their background and also based on children’s appearance
- m/c children and those of neat appearance (‘tigers’) were seated in front near the teacher and received the most attention and encouragement
- w/c children sat at the back and were given low level reading books (‘clowns’)
Self-fulfilling prophecy
is a prediction that comes true simply because it was made- labelling leads to self-fulfilling prophecy
Rosenthal & Jacobson
- carried out study of labelling and self-fulfilling prophecy in a primary school
- was a covert study in which they told the teachers they had a test which would identify the students with highest potential (spurt).however the test were just standard IQ tests
- students were tested and R&J chose 20% of them randomly and told teachers that they were ‘spurters’
- a year later R&J found out that from the 20%, 47% had made significant progress.
CRITICISM of R&J
however it can be argued that the study had ethical issues as it was covert and R&J deceived the students and teachers. also due to the experiment the students who didn’t randomly get chosen were put into disadvantage even if they would had the potential.