Class 7 Flashcards

Decision Making, Underlying Assumption, and Causal Claims

1
Q

Bounded Rationality

A

Limited thinking capacities, the information available to us, and limited time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Satisficing

A

Choosing the most acceptable solution to a problem rather than an optimal one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PADIL

A

A Problem solving framework (Problem, Alternatives, Decide, Implement, Learn)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Systemic approach

A

In organizations, there are elements “hanging together” like a system because they continually affect each other over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Brainstorming

A

A group sit face to face around a table with a flip chart or whiteboard. No criticism/judgements. All alternatives are recorded for later discussion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problem with brainstorming

A

People aren’t able to defer judgement and don’t offer creative solutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brainwriting/nominal group technique

A

Generate ideas on their own, record them but not share. Participants’ ideas are shared anonymously. People can then build upon them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Equifinality

A

Part of Decide on a solution. A condition in which different initial conditions lead to similar effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weighted ranking table

A

Assigning a weight based on importance and then attributing a score, to get a more accurate rating.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Devil’s Advocate

A

To provide critique of the proposal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Learn and seek Feedback

A

Examine whether the decision was truly successful and continues to be the right solution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intuition

A

Represents decisions that are nonconscious and based on thoughts and preferences come to mind quickly.
Common for intuition to be influenced by unconscious biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fundamental attribution error

A

We often over-attribute others’ behaviour to internal rather than external causes.

Ex: Arriving late without offering an explanation. (Judging the character with a lack of concern for external factors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self-Serving Bias

A

We often attribute personal successes to internal causes and personal failures to external causes.

Ex: when getting an A, attribute your success to hard work; when getting a D, attribute your failure to confusing professors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Availability bias

A

Interpret readily available information as being more important or as occurring more frequently.

E.g., There are fewer homicides than suicides, but we tend to think the opposite.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Representativeness bias

A

Pay more attention to descriptors we believe to be more representative than the key base rate information (e.g., MBA student writing poetry must be fine arts major in undergrad and will go for an arts management job)
(Includes Gambler’s Fallacy and Hasty Generalization Fallacy)

Ex: Let’s say you’re going to a concert with your friend Sarah. She also invited her two friends, John and Adam, whom you’ve never met before. You know that one is a mathematician, while the other is a musician.

When you finally meet Sarah’s friends, you notice that John wears glasses and is a bit shy, while Adam is more outgoing and dressed in a band T-shirt and ripped jeans. Without asking, you assume that John must be the mathematician and Adam must be the musician.

17
Q

Gambler’s Fallacy

A

Misconceptions of chance.

Ex: flipped 5 heads in a row so you are “due” to get tails on the next one… They are all statistically independent.

18
Q

Anchoring and Adjustment Bias

A

The tendency to provide estimates based on the initial starting estimate, regardless of its accuracy.

E.g., Earrings you saw is $100, then found a necklace for $75, still over budget but you bought it

19
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

Tendency to collect evidence that supports rather than disproves our intuition.

E.g., only search information supporting your hypothesis that playing memory games delay memory loss.

20
Q

Overconfidence bias

A

The belief that we posses some unique trait or ability that allows us to defy odds.

E.g., stock market professionals were not more accurate in predicting stock performance than lay people

21
Q

Escalation of commitment

A

A tendency to continue to invest additional resources in failing courses of action even though no foreseeable payoff is evident.

E.g., spent $950 on an old car and continue to invest $1500 for other repairs even though the money spent is irrelevant to the cost of new repairs

22
Q

What are 3 ways to over coming judgement Biases?

A

Confidence estimates, Trial and error calibration, Healthy skepticism

23
Q

Confidence estimates

A

State estimates in intervals rather than as a single point estimate

E.g., 14-22 on time pizza delivery rather than 18

Address overconfidence bias

24
Q

Trial and error calibration

A

Improve your success rate and reduce your failure tomorrow, you must learn from your successes and failures today

E.g., weather forecast, adjust meteorological model

Address confirmation bias (keep track both confirming and disconfirming evidence)

25
Q

Healthy skepticism

A

Seek out negative or disconfirming evidence.
Address escalation of commitment (how will I know if I am wrong? Construct definition of failure), representative bias (what is the base rate), anchoring bias (do not jump to conclusion), availability and representative bias (do not base your conclusion only on your own experience)

26
Q

Underlying Assumptions

A

Logical link that fills the gap between the evidence and the claim

Ex:
Claim: John Molson is a bad teacher
Evidence: His class average is 60%
Underlying assumptions possible: Assumption A: 60% is a bad grade
Assumption B: A bad teacher gives bad grades

27
Q

Reality Assumptions. How to challenge?

A

Our belief about the way things are.

Ex:
Claim: Students are more knowledgeable today
Evidence: More than 80% of Canadians have access to the internet at home
Assumption: Using the internet helps students to become knowledgeable

To challenge: Show the author’s notions of reality are debatable/wrong

28
Q

Value Assumptions. How to challenge?

A

Our ideals, our standards of right and wrong, our beliefs about how things should be.

Ex:
Claim: Canada goose should be boycotted
Evidence: Canada Goose kills coyotes to make fur-lined hoods
Assumption: Killing coyotes/animal cruelty is immoral

To challenge: Demonstrate the author’s argument is rooted in a particular set of value assumptions

29
Q

Causal Claims

A

Certain events or factors (causes) are responsible for bringing about events or situations (effects).

Ex: Sales of frozen foods are falling because consumers are increasingly concerned about high salt content in their foods (causal claim).
Concern for salt content (cause)
Falling sales (effect)

30
Q

Rival Causes

A

Other causes that could account for the same effect

31
Q

Reverse Causation

A

Flip the cause-effect relationship

Cause-effect: Job performance leads to job satisfaction

Reverse causation: Job satisfaction leads to job performance