Class 3 - The legitimacy crisis of democracy Flashcards
What is the Democratic Fatigue Syndrome (Van Reybrouck)?
- crisis of legitimacy
People no longer feeling represented & engaged by the government - crisis of efficiency
People’s perception of gov. As being able to solve their problems
Underlying assumptions of crisis of democracy
- once dem was not in crisis
- dem are by definition representative
- low levels of trust & interest are automatically bad
- people want but cannot be engaged in gov
- people know what democracy means
- people are able to assess the quality of a democracy
- people have moved away from politics
The two sides of the ‘crisis of democracy’ - Easton
- REGIME support
- support for nation state
- support for democracy - PROCESS support
- input legitimacy
- throughoutput legitimacy
- output legitimacy
Source & Dimensions of INPUT legitimacy
- source: openness of the political system to the needs of the people
- dimensions: inclusiveness, representativeness, accountability
Source & Dimensions of THROUGHOUTPUT legitimacy
- source: procedures and mechanisms that link public preferences to political decisions in a fair way
- dimensions: legality, transparency, fairness
Source & Dimensions of OUTPUT legitimacy
- source: responsiveness of the policies to the needs of the people
- dimensions: efficiency, effectiveness, economy, responsiveness
In terms of REGIME support, trends in national pride? Satisfaction with democracy? Trust and approval of gov?
- differences between countries
- changes pos and neg on individual basis
How does the data on regime support look like?
- nation-state: stable and high
- democracy as org form: increasing support
Gov legitimacy MIGHT have taken a hit, but REGIME legitimacy is as strong as ever.
Why do we perceive a crisis of democracy?
- Contemporary world features
- cognitive mobilisation
- political consumerism
-social media and technology
- politics, media, business: Bermuda triangle - Democratic contenders; discourse coming from
- populists
- technocrats
- direct democrats
- deliberative democrats
What is the populist diagnosis?
issues with INPUT
Problem
- crisis of democratic linkage (disconnect between ‘the people’ and ‘the elites’)
Solutions
- better representation of ‘the populus’ and its needs
- strong leadership
Critiques
-ideological ambiguity
- populists are themselves elites
- who are ‘the people’?
What is the technocrat diagnosis?
Issues with OUTPUT
Problem
- elites are prevented from making real decisions
Solutions
- good governance»_space;>
-
Critiques
- populist backlash
- efficiency does not generate legitimacy
- moral trade-offs
What is direct democrats diagnosis?
THROUGHOUTPUT
Problem:
- parliaments = hollowed-out arenas
- democratic trusteeship no longer works
Solution:
-neo-parliamentarianism
-anti-parliamentarianism
Critiques
- power to the people becomes power to the majority
- referendum design is v important
What is deliberative democrats diagnosis? (Mainly look at elections)
THROUGHOUTPUT
Problems:
- electoral fundamentalism
- elections are fundamentally flawed
Solution
- sortition
- deliberation
Conclusions on the crisis of democracy
- perception and discourse = crisis; data =/= crisis
- fluctuations over time and across countries
- is the idea of crisis strategically used by politicians, media etc?