Class Flashcards

1
Q

What are the two types of people?

A

disadvantaged/working class: manual occupations which traditionally include skilled workers, semi-skilled workers & unskilled workers

advantages/middle class: non-manual occupations traditionally including professionals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Class & Educational Achievement key statistics

A

WC kids more likely to:
- start school unable to read
- do vocational courses
- placed in lower streams (4x for bottom set)
- be out of work by aged 21
- earn less in jobs despite similar qualifications

WC kids less likely to:
- do well in tests
- get a place in top performing state schools (90% of failing schools in deprived areas)
- achieve good exam results (75% of MC achieve 5 A*-C compared to less than 1/3 WC)
- go onto university
- do the EBacc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the Sutton Trust study find out about Oxbridge places?

+ FSM children achievement statistics

A

Pupils from 8 schools (6 private, 2 grammar) filled 1,310 Oxbridge places over 3 years, compared with 1,220 from 2,900 other schools

+ only 29% achieved 5+ in English and Maths compared to 57% on non FSM pupils in 2022
+ non FSM pupils 2x as likely to pass both English & Maths compared to FSM kids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the external school explanations for class differences in educational achievement?

+ what are the internal school explanations?

A

1) Material deprivation

2) Cultural deprivation/capital
- cultural attitudes, beliefs & views
- socio-linguistics
- cultural capital

+ Interactionist/Labelling Theories:
- stereotyping, labelling & self-fulfilling prophecy
- setting & streaming
- unequal access to classroom knowledge
- Pupil subcultures
- ‘wider’ educational policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is material deprivation?

+ who was the main sociologist involved in this theory & what are his ideas?

+ what else did he observe?

A

Lacking necessary material and economic means to function effectively & comfortably

Douglas
Material deprivation factors linking parental support to educational achievement:

  • overcrowded home
  • poor diets
  • low income/unemployment
  • lack of nursery provision
  • taking up a part-time job
  • disadvantaged, poverty stricken areas

+ children from lower WC backgrounds were less likely to stay in school
+ MC parents more likely to encourage their children to succeed & socialise them more effectively to achieve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of research methods did Douglas use?

+ how can his study be evaluated?

A

Longitudinal Study (1964)
of 5362 children born in the first week of March in 1946 continuing until they were 16

  • divided into groups based on ability measured through IQ tests
  • sub-divided into 4 social class groups

+ IQ tests unreliable
+ cultural capital misrepresents ability of WC children
+ common high drop out rate in long studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Howard (2001) say class affects educational achievement?

+ what did Tanner et al (2003) say?

A
  • young people from poorer homes have lower intakes of energy, vitamins & minerals
  • poor nutrition affects health which may lead to increased school absences

+ lack of financial support means children have to do without equipment & educational experiences
+ costs place burden on poor families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Wilkinson (1996) say class affects educational achievement?

+ statistics which show teachers are supporting struggling families?

A
  • children from poorer homes often have behavioural and/or emotional problems
  • among ten year olds, lower social class equates to higher rates of hyperactivity, anxiety & disorders

+ approx 34% say their school is helping with teeth brushing
+ approx 15% say they have spent their own money to provide food for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does Sugarman suggest cultural deprivation is affecting working class educational achievement?

A

There are extreme differences between WC & MC extreme subcultures

  • WC vs MC:
    + fatalism vs optimism (due to role models)
    + collectivism (e.g trade unions & Labour voting) vs individualism
    + immediate gratification vs deferred gratification (e.g uni, investments etc)
    + present-time orientation vs future orientation
  • MC occupations have more opportunity for promotion which is the opposite for WC jobs which is why they value the here and now
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What research method did Sugarman use?

+ Weaknesses of his view?

A

Interviews & questionnaires (longitudinal) 1970

+ responses may not reflect true reality
+ is it not quite difficult for the WC to not be fatalistic?
+ victim blaming (Keddie)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does Bernstein suggest cultural deprivation is affecting working class educational achievement?

A

Suggests that the WC & MC use different linguistic codes

  • WC (restricted code) vs MC (elaborated code):
    + limited vocab vs large vocab
    + grammatically simple vs gramatically complex
    + gesticulations vs fully elaborative
    + context bound vs abstract
    + particularistic vs universal
  • MC are advantages and education & MC professions rely on the elaborated code e.g textbooks
  • WC are unable to fully engage as their code is ‘deficient’ & therefore teachers assume their ability is lower
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What research method did Bernstein use?

+ Weaknesses of his view?

A

Used two five year old boys from different social classes to explain a series of four pictures (experimental)
1961

+ hardly representative
+ simplistic approach
+ little evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does Bourdieu suggest cultural capital is affecting working class educational achievement?

A
  • Each class possesses its own cultural framework (habitus) which is ideas about what is good/bad etc
  • Dominant group get to impose theirs on society:
    + Education favours & rewards MC cultural traits and punishes WC traits. WC kids alienated and clash culturally

WC: (opposite for MC)
Low cultural capital + low economic capital + low educational capital = failure
- this reproduces inequality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened to England during the 1980s?

+ how has this impacted social mobility?

A
  • end of the golden age of social mobility
  • manufacturing industry disintegrated
  • divide between rich and poor widened by 60%
  • ‘hourglass economy’ created

+ now in the UK approx 50% of earning power is down to effort and the other 50% down to your financial position at birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Statistic which show the people of higher classes get the best jobs

A
  • 3/4 judges went to private school
  • 1 in 3 politicians went to private school
  • 2 in 3 of house of Lords went to it
  • more than 1/2 of top doctors went to it
  • medical courses take in 2x as many wealthy people as others
  • only 1/7 of those accepted on medical courses are from lowest 50% of wealth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does Reay suggest cultural capital is affecting working class educational achievement?

A
  • MC mothers have the knowledge and skills to help their children more effectively with homework & challenging/negotiating with the school
  • MC mothers can afford domestic help (freeing up more time for their children) and pay for tutors
  • WC kids don’t have this advantage as their mothers have less cultural capital
17
Q

Which research method did Reay use?

+ Strengths and weaknesses of her view?

A

Interviewed mothers of 33 children at two primary schools in London

+ provides empirical support for Bourdieu’s theory
- London has high wealth inequality, increased choice & more common hiring of domestic help so does not represent the rest of England
- Small sample size

18
Q

How do Ball, Bowe & Gerwitz suggest cultural capital is affecting working class educational achievement?

+ what research method did they use?

A

Wrote Competitive Advantage & Parental Choice

  • 1988 Education Reform Act led to schools focusing more on performance than student well-being
  • shift in values from comprehensive & social justice to market values, money & reputation
  • suspicion and hostility between schools
  • found parental choice was limited by availability of schools & capital of parents
    (3 types of chooser)

+ conducted surveys of 15 schools in 3 neighbouring LEAs
+ attended meetings and interviewed people
+ varied school types and interviewees
(methodological plurality)

19
Q

What are some critiques of Material/ Cultural Deprivation Theories?
(include sociologists)

A

1) Compensatory Education & Positive Discrimination
- designed to counteract effects
- e.g Aim Higher, Pupil Premium & National Literacy and Numeracy

2) Myth of Cultural Deprivation
+ (Keddie) - way of blaming victims. WC culture is different not deficient & focus should be on challenging teachers’ anti-WC prejudices
(cultural pluralism)

+ (Tryna & Williams) - teachers’ reactions to diff language styles are to blame

+ (Blackstone & Mortimore)- WC parents are not disinterested on their children’s education. Often unable to attend parents evenings due to transport issues or work commitments (semi-skilled choosers)

20
Q

How does the gap widen between WC & MC children in education?

+ statistic

A

WC children are continually disadvantaged throughout their childhood & school life
e.g - mothers more likely to experience stressful pregnancies
- weak home learning environment
- less able to benefit from education system (higher teacher turnover & stereotype threat)

+ 18.1 month gap at GCSE between FSM/PP children & others

21
Q

What was Rutter’s study of class & educational achievement?

+ what were his findings?

A

Looked at 12 schools in London where the intake was very similar (same catchment), but results were very different. Interviewed students.

+ quality of schools are key to success or failure of pupils
+ certain characteristics made schools more effective:
- teachers being well prepared for lessons
- teachers having high expectations of pupils
- teachers place more emphasis on praise & reward than punishment or blame
- teachers lead by example
- teachers treat pupils as responsible
- mixed ability classes
- teachers should generate a good ethos
- teachers show a genuine interest

22
Q

What is labelling?

What was Becker’s study of labelling?

+ what were his findings?

A

Attaching a meaning to someone based on stereotypes

  • Interviews of 60 high school teachers (controversial manner)

+ teachers stereotyped students based on their work, conduct & appearance
+ teachers saw MC children as closest to ‘ideal pupil’ & WC children as furthest away

23
Q

What was Cicourel & Kitsuse’s study of counsellors & labelling?

+ what were their findings?

A

Observation of counsellors meeting with students

+ careers counsellors assesses students largely on social class and/or race
+ they would judge students ‘suitability’ for courses
+ MC students tended to be referred to higher ability courses & academic subjects

24
Q

What was Rist’s study of labelling in primary schools?

+ what were his findings?

A

Observation of Kindergarten in USA

+ teachers use information about their pupils’ home backgrounds (as well as judging appearance) to place them into separate groups
+ each group asked to sit at diff tables. ‘Fast Learners’ labelled as ‘Tigers’, seated nearer to the teacher & given more encouragement (usually MC kids)
+ other groups were ‘Cardinals & Clowns” and had opposite (usually WC kids)

25
What was Keddie's study of labelling? + what were her findings? (whose study supported her view?)
Observation in secondary school + teachers don't distribute knowledge evenly within the classroom + MC students given 'high status knowledge' & WC given opposite + Low Ability Groups (mostly WC): - descriptive, common sense, basic & dumbed down + High Ability Groups (mostly MC): - abstract, theoretical, detailed & full curriculum (Dunne & Gazely 2008- schools normalised WC underachievement. Attitude of 'nothing we can do' as they have a bad home life. Potential underestimated e.g entered into foundation tier
26
What is the self-fulfilling prophecy? + how does it work?
Prediction that comes true purely on the basis for it being made in the first place 1) Teacher labels pupil & makes predictions about them in relation to the label 2) The teacher interacts with the pupil based on this label & prediction 3) The pupil internalizes the label & it becomes part of their self-concept. Pupil becomes label & acts accordingly to the prediction 'fulfilling' the original 'prophecy'
27
What was Hargreaves' study of setting & streaming and anti-school subcultures? + what were his findings? (whose work does this link to?)
Observation, informal conversations, questionnaires, teaching in school & documents + damaging factors such as labelling & SFP as well as setting & streaming prevent WC pupils achieving rewards & status in education system + WC pupils feel school's value system contradicts their own options, status & progression + This creates frustration leading to anti-school subcultures in an attempt to achieve 'Peer Group Status' + 'pro-school'= 'Halo effect' & warmed up by teachers & 'anti-schools'= cooled down + setting is less likely to lead to anti-school sub culture (Willis & the 'lads' and Hyman & Sugarman)
28
What was Lacey's study of creation of pupil subcultures? + what were his findings? (what does this link to?)
Observation, informal conversations, questionnaires, teaching in school & documents of Hightown Grammar Subcultures form due to: + differentiation: categorizing of pupils according to stereotyping and setting & streaming & exam tiers + polarisation: ways pupils respond to differentiation (2 extremes) - pro-school subculture= 'halos, warmed up, positive labels, high sets & streams etc - anti-school subculture= low expectations, cooled down, less attention etc leading to alienation (reproduction of class inequality)
29
What was Ball's study of the dangers of setting & streaming? + what were his findings?
Study of Beachside Comprehensive over 3 years. Participant observation/unstructured interviews & documents + as streaming & setting were phased out (and replaced w mixed ability) the polarisation into subcultures lessened + teachers were still likely to differentiate pupils according to social class (reflected in exam results showing SFP may have been created)
30
What was Gilbourn & Youdell's study of the impact of marketisation on labelling? + what were their findings (whose idea does this link to?)
Observations, interviews & secondary documents + due to policies of marketisation, schools and colleges are likely to 'ration' their time & resources towards most able people + created an Educational Triage ("A-C Economy") in which the border-line cases (mainly MC) got the most time & resources and hopeless cases (mostly WC) & certain passes (MC) didn't (Bartlett's cream-skimming & silt-sifting)
31
How can internal explanations be evaluated? + how can Sub Cultural Theories be criticised?
- other paths have been set up for students now - acknowledges education system is not neutral - (Marx) ignore wider structural problems e.g inequalities of capitalism - assume all teachers label & stereotype - assume labels 'stick' & dictate future - too deterministic (Fuller's study found labelled pupils became pro education but anti school) - ignore factors such as ethnicity and gender - ignore cultural & material deprivation theories + ignore other types of responses by pupils: e.g (Woods) - ritualism & retreatism e.g (Furlong) responses aren't fixed
32
What was Archer's study of class identity? + what is a habitus & what were her findings on this?
investigated how identities we form at home we take with us into school + ways of being, thinking & acting shared by a social class + affects outlook of what is normal for 'people like them' + MC has power to define their habitus as superior & impose it on the education system + MC pupils have an advantage because of this
33
What is symbolic capital? + what is symbolic violence according to Bourdieu & what is the affect of these WC pupils?
- assigning status and recognition to middle class tastes in school - devaluing working class habitus so pupils' clothing, appearance, accent etc is deemed worthless & tasteless + withholding symbolic capital + deeming WC tastes as inferior reproduces class inequality + clashes between MC & WC habitus leads to Wc pupils feeling alienated + WC students 'lose themselves' by trying to change & feel unable to access MC spaces e.g uni & professions
34
What are Nike Identities? + what do these lead to?
Pupils seek alternative ways of creating self-worth by investing heavily in 'styles' especially via branded clothing - pupil identities strongly gendered - style heavily policed by peer groups + conflict with the school dress code + becomes a part of WC rejection of higher education as they see it as undesirable & unrealistic for themselves (this causes self-elimination/exclusion from education & educational marginalisation)
35
What was Ingram's study of class identity? + what was Evans' study of class identity?
- study of two groups of WC Catholic boys from the same deprived neighbourhood in Belfast - one group at a grammar & the others not - WC community provided a sense of belonging to them all - Boys (especially at grammar) felt pressured to fit in e.g ridiculed for wearing a tracksuit + group of WC girls from London at a comprehensive + girls were reluctant to apply to elite universities such as Oxbridge + girls had strong attachments to their locality & many didn't want to move away for university