CL Inchoate Offenses Flashcards

1
Q

Inchoate Offense

A

Conduct that is intended to result in the commission of a substantive criminal offense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of inchoate offenses

A

Attempt, solicitation, conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CL Attempt

A

A person is guilty of criminal attempt when, with the intention to commit the crime, the person engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime, whether or not the intention is accomplished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Attempt Merger

A
  • If a person commits the “target” offense, they may not be convicted of BOTH the target offense AND attempt.
  • Failure to commit the target offense may even be an element of attempt in some jurisdictions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Two types of CL Attempt

A

Complete: the actor does all the things she set out to do, but fails to achieve her goal.
Incomplete: the actor does some of the things necessary to achieve her goal, but quits or is prevented from completing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What act is enough to go from preparation to perpetuation?

A

CL: Act must be significant, attempt is a misdemeanor
Modern: tests to determine, attempt to commit felony is a felony but receives lighter sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

People v. Gentry

A

D and his wife were in fight and D spilt gasoline on his wife next to open flame. She caught fire and D was charged with attempted murder. To be charged with attempted murder you must have the same mens rea required of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What tests

A
Last act
Indespensible Element
Physical Proximity 
Dangerous Proximity 
Unequivocality
Probable Disistance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Last Act Test

A

Attempt occurs only when the person performs all the acts that she believed were necessary to commit the target offense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Physical Proximity

A

Conduct must be proximate to the completed crime: it has to approach sufficiently near it to stand either as the first or some subsequent step in a direct movement towards the commission of the offense after the preparations are made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Probable Desistance

A

Attempt occurs when, in the ordinary course of events, without interruption from an external source, the actor reached a point where it was unlikely that he would have voluntarily desisted from his effort to commit the crime. Factfinder assesses whether an ordinary person in the actor’s shoes has reached the point of no return.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dangerous Proximity

A

The greater the gravity of and the probability of an offense, and the nearer the act is to the crime, then there’s a stronger case for calling it an attempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indispensable Element

A

In figuring out proximity, courts look at any indispensable aspect of the criminal endeavor over which the actor hasn’t yet acquired control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Unequivocally

A

An act is not an attempt unless it ceases to be equivocal. Look at whether a person’s conduct, standing alone, unambiguously manifests her criminal intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Impossibility

A

Defense to attempt
Because of the defendant’s mistake of fact or law, his actions could not have resulted in the commission of the substantive crime underlying an attempt charge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

People v. Thousand

A

Guy messeging FBI agent he thought was underage girl, trying to get sex. A defendant can be convicted of attempt even if it is impossible to complete the underlying offense because there was no underage girl. Factual impossibility not a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Factual Impossibility

A

Not a defense. Argues it was a factual impossibility for the crime to happen

18
Q

Hybrid legal impossibility

A

Actor’s intended goal is illegal, but commission of the offense is impossible due to a factual mistake regarding the legal status of some attendant circumstance that constitutes an element of the charged crime.
Most jurisdictions have abolished this.

19
Q

Legal impossibility

A

The criminal law does not prohibit the actor’s conduct or the result she has sought to achieve, but the actor believes that it does.

20
Q

Inherent Factual Impossibility

A

The method used to try to accomplish the crime is one that a reasonable person would view as totally inappropriate to the objective sought.

21
Q

Abandonment of Attempt

A

Abandonment: The defendant must voluntarily and completely renounce his criminal purpose.
Voluntary: Result of repentance or genuine change of heart.
Not Voluntary: Unexpected resistance, absence of instrumentality essential to complete the crime, or other circumstance increasing likelihood of arrest or unsuccessful consummation.
Not Complete: Postponing criminal activity until a better opportunity presents itself.
Abandonment is not a defense, even if the desistance is motivated by remorse & is complete if the actor has performed the last act necessary to commit the offense or caused serious harm.
-only some jurisdictions recognize this defense

22
Q

Commonwealth v. Peaslee

A

D put combustibles in building, asked someone to burn it down, was refused, drove to burn it down but turned around. Proximity test

23
Q

People v. Rizzo

A

Guys tried to rob man they knew would be carrying money but never found him. They entered bank looking for him and were arrested. No dangerous proximity bc guy wasn’t there

24
Q

State v. Reeves

A

Middle schoolers wanted to kill middle school teacher but never poisoned her. Attempted second degree murder

25
Q

Commonwealth v McCloskey

A

Attempted escape from prison. Had voluntary change of heart

26
Q

CL Solicitation

A

A person invites, requests, commands, hires, or encourages another to engage in conduct constituting any felony, or a misdemeanor relating to obstruction of justice or a breach of the peace
-misdemeanor

27
Q

elements of solicitation

A

Mens Rea:
Specific intent offense
Intent to perform the acts that constitute the solicitation.
Specific intent that the other person commit the solicited offense.
Actus Reus:
Inviting, requesting, commanding, hiring, or encouraging another to commit a crime.
Solicitation is complete the instant the actor communicates the solicitation to the other party.
What about when the actor does not succeed in the communication?

28
Q

State v. Cotton

A

Man wrote letters in prison to convince wife to convince step-daughter not to testify. An uncommunicated solicitation is insufficient to constitute the offense of criminal solicitation.

29
Q

CL Conspiracy

A

An agreement, express or implied, between two or more persons to commit a criminal act, a series of criminal acts, or accomplish a legal act by unlawful means.

  • there must be an overt act (doesn’t have to be criminal)
  • never merges with target crime
30
Q

CL Conspiracy agreement

A

-Can be express or implied
Agreement exists even if: (1) not all parties know every detail of the arrangement as long as they know the essential nature, and (2) not all the parties know each other.
-three must be an overt act
-must have men’s rea to 1) agree and 2) commit the target offense
-depending on agreement, can have 1 count of conspiracy or multiple depending on nature of agreement

31
Q

Types of conspiracy

A

Bilateral Conspiracy: The actual agreement of at least two participants is required for a conspiracy.

Unilateral Conspiracy: Only one of the alleged conspirators needs to intend to agree to the commission of the offense. (MPC and many states)

32
Q

Pinkerton rule

A

A party to a conspiracy is responsible for any criminal act committed by an associate if: (1) it was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, and (2) the act is a foreseeable consequence of the unlawful agreement.

33
Q

People v. Swain

A

A conviction for conspiracy to commit murder requires proof of the intent to kill.

34
Q

Pinkerton v. US

A

Brothers both charged with attempted tax fraud and one in jail didn’t help but had agreed. A defendant who conspires with another person is criminally liable for all substantive offenses committed by the coconspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy, even if the defendant did not know about the coconspirator’s acts and did not assist him in any manner.

35
Q

Commonwealth v. Azim

A

D driving car with friend, friend got out of car, robbed a guy, and got back into car and D drove away. A conviction of conspiracy may be based solely upon circumstantial evidence.

36
Q

Commonwealth v. Cook

A

Girl r*ped by brother when she was walking, is other brother guilty of conspiracy? Mere evidence that the defendant was an accomplice to a crime is insufficient evidence to prove a conspiracy.

37
Q

United States v. Valle

A

Guy talked about cannibalism on internet, setting out details and shopping lists with other people. No conspiracy.

38
Q

CL Inchoate to Substantive Merger

A

Solicitation becomes conspiracy if parties agree

The attempt becomes substantive if the crime is committed

39
Q

Wharton’s rule

A

an agreement by two persons to commit an offense that requires the voluntary, concerted criminal participation of two persons cannot be prosecuted as conspiracy

- whether the elements of the offense requires an agreement
- mostly now treated as a presumption: apply unless there is legislative intent to the contrary
- exceptions, must be same 2 people
- MPC does not recognize this defense ex: dueling and adultery
40
Q

Defenses to solicitation

A
  • no intent for them to commit crime
  • to renunciate you must:
    • persuade not to do act, OR
    • prevent them from doing act