CIVPRO - RULE 33-39 Flashcards
What is a demurrer to evidence?
A demurrer to evidence is a motion to dismiss on the ground of insufficiency of evidence
Note: A demurrer to evidence shall be subject to the provisions of Rule 15 of litigious motions
When may a demurrer to evidence be filed in civil cases?
The defendant may file a demurrer to evidence after the plaintiff has finished presenting his evidence
What is the ground for a demurrer to evidence?
The ground is that upon the facts the law, the plaintiff has shown no right to relief or insufficiency of evidence
What is the effect of denial of the demurrer to evidence in civil case?
If the motion is denied, the movant shall have the right to present evidence
What is the effect of granting the demurrer to evidence in civil cases?
The case shall be dismissed with prejudice
Is the order granting a demurrer to evidence appealable?
Yes, the plaintiff may appeal as the grant is considered as judgment on the merits of the case
What is the effect when the order granting demurrer to evidence is reversed?
If the defendant’s motion for judgment on demurrer to evidence is granted and the order is subsequently reversed on appeal, the defendant shall be deemed to have waived his right to present evidence
Note: The appellate court cannot remand the case for further proceedings; rather, it should render judgment on the basis of the evidence by the plaintiff
May the order denying the demurrer to evidence in civil cases be assailed by appeal, certiorari, prohibition or mandamus?
No. The order denying the demurrer to evidence shall not be subject of an appeal or petition for certiorari, prohibition or mandamus before judgment.
Distinguish demurrer between civil and criminal cases
Grounds = Civil: facts and law shows that plaintiff has no right to relief; Criminal: insufficiency of evidence by prosecution
Leave of Court = Civil: not required; Criminal: may be filed with or without leave but has different consequences
Effect of denial = Civil: D can present evidence; Criminal: with L, D can present evidence; with no L, D not allowed to present evidence because waived
Appeal of grant = Civil: appealable, reversal on appeal is waiver of D’s right to present evid; Criminal: no appeal on grant because it is acquittal (note on GADALEJ)
Remedy agaisnt denial = Civil: no appeal, cert, mandamus; Criminal: same
Who may invoke = Civil: D; Criminal: motu proprio or D.
What is a judgment
A judgment is one that finally disposes of a case, leaving nothing more for the court to do with respect to it. It may either be an adjudication of the merits, which, considering the evidence presented at the trial, declares categorically with the rights, and the obligations of the parties are, or it may be an order or judgment, that dismisses an action without considering the merits.
NOTE: No appeal may be taken from an order dismissing an action without prejudice.
When should there be judgment after pre-trial?
Should there be no more controverted facts, or no more genuine issue as to any material fact or an absence of any issue or should the answer fail to tender an issue the court shall motu proprio include in the pretrial order that the case be submitted for summary judgment, or judgment, on the pleadings, without need of position, papers or memoranda.
NOTE: The foregoing is without prejudice to a party also moving fro judgment on the pleadings under Rule 34 or summary judgmetn under Rule 35 (ROC R18S10)
May such motu proprio court order to submit the case to summary judgment or judgmetn on the pleadings be assailed by appeal or certiorari?
No, the order of the court to submit the case for judgment pursuant the section 10 of rule 18 shall not be the subject of appeal or certiorari. (R18 S10)
What is a judgment on the merits?
A judgment may be considered, as one rendered on the merits when it determines the rights and liabilities of the parties, based on the disclosed facts, irrespective of formal, technical or dilatory objections; or when the judgment is rendered, after a determination of which party is right, as distinguished from a judgment, rendered upon some preliminary or formal, or merely technical point.
May there be judgment on the merits without trial?
Yes, it does not required that a trial, actual hearing or argument on the facts of the case ensued before there is judgment on the merits for as long as the parties had the full legal opportunity to be heard on their respective claims and contentions.
Cite the instances where there may be judgment on the merits without trial.
[DeP-EP-DiSP-SCS]
[1] Judgment by [D]efault (R9 S3)
[2] Where the aciton si dismissed with [P]rejudice:
a. On the ground of res juidicata, prescription, unenforceability under the statute of frauds, or that the plaintiff’s claim has been paid, waived, abandoned or otherwise extinguished (R15 S13);
b. Under the two-dismissal rule (R17 S1)
c. Due to the fault of the plaintiff, unless otherwise declared by the court (R17 S3); and
d. Due to failure of plaintiff to attend pre-trial or to submit a pre-trial brief, unless otherwise declared by the court (R18 S5 & 6).
[3] Judgmetn on the basis of evidence offered Ex parte, due to failure of defendant to attend pre-trial or to submit a pre-trial brief (R18 S5&6)
[4] Judgment after Pre-trial (R18 S10)
[5] Judgment by default against a party disobeying an order to comply with modes of [D]iscovery (R29 S3 & 5)
[6] Judgment based on agreed Stipulation of facts (R30 S7)
[7] Judgment on the Pleadings (R34)
[8] Summary judgment (R35)
[9] Judgment on a Compromise (NCC Art. 2037)
[10] Judgment in civil cases governed by the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure.
When may a motion for judgment on the pleadings be properly filed?
A motion for judgment on the pleadings is proper, where the answer fails to tender an issue, or otherwise admits the material allegations of the adverse party’s pleading (R34 S1)
When does an answer “fail to tender an issue” or “otherwise admit the material allegations of the adverse party’s pleadings?”
The answer would fail to tender an issue. If it does not comply with a requirements for specific denial, set out, and rule eight, and it would admit the material allegations of the adverse parties bleedings, not only where it expressly confesses the truthfulness of but also if it admits to deal with them at all.
When is judgment on the pleadings improper?
The fololowing actions cannot be subject of a jdugment on the pleadings as the material facts alleged in the complaint shall always be proved:
1. Declaration of nullity of marriage;
2. Annulment of marriage; or
3. Legal separation (R34 S1)
Is there judgment on the pleadings only upon motion of a party?
No, the court may motu proprio or on motion render judgment on the pleadings if it is apparent that the answer fails to tender and issue, or otherwise admits the material allegations of the adverse party’s pleadings (R34 S2)
May the court’s action on the motion for jdugment on the pleadings be assailed?
No, any action of the court on a motion for judgment on the pleadings shall not be subject of an appeal or petition for certiorari , prohibition, or mandamus (R34 S2).
When may the court properly render a summary judgment?
Unless the court orders, the conduct of a hearing a summary judgment shall be rendered for with if the pleadings supporting affidavits, depositions and admissions on file, show that except as to the amount of damages, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law (R35 S3).
What is a genuine issue?
A genuine issue of fact is such issue of fact, which requires the presentation of evidence, as distinguished from a sham, fictitious contrived or false claim, as such an issue of fact, is genuine if it requires presentation of evidence to be resolved.
When may a claimant file a motion for a summary judgment?
A party seeking to recover upon a claim, counterclaim, or cross claim, or to obtain a declaratory relief, may, at any time after the pleading in answer there to has been served, move for summary judgment, upon all, or any part thereof. (R35 S1)