Civil Rights SC Cases Flashcards

Study for a test

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

A

Slaves are property and Congress can’t do anything about that (equal protection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

A

Separate but equal is okay (equal protection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Shenck v. US (1919)

A

Must not present a “clear and present danger” (Freedom of Speech)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

A

First amendment applies to states too (1 amd.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Korematsu v. US (1944)

A

National security trumps individuals rights (equal protection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Everson v. BoE (1947)

A

“Wall of Separation” doctrine (freedom of religion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brown v. BoE Topeka, KS (1954)

A

Separate in inherently not equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

A

Evidence must be legally obtained (4 amd.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

A

No prayer in public school (freedom of religion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

NY Times v. Sullivan (1964)

A

Libel requires actual malice (freedom of speech)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright (1964)

A

Right to attorney even if you can’t afford one (5 amd.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

A

“Right to” implied (state banned contraceptve sales) (freedom of privacy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

A

Right to remain silent, not confess (5 amd.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

A

Student can wear an armband to protest (freedom of speech)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Brandenberg v. Ohio (1969)

A

Violent speech is not action (no prior restraint) (freedom of speech)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

A

3 test of govt./relig entanglement (freedom of religion)

17
Q

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Co. BoE (1971)

A

Busing/Gerrymandering are ok (equal protection)

18
Q

Reed v. Reed (1971)

A

Gender discriminaation violates equal protection (equal protection)

19
Q

NY Times v. US (1971)

A

Pentagon paper publilshing; no prior restraint (freedom of speech)

20
Q

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

A

Religion trumps education (freedom of religion)

21
Q

Miller v. California (1973)

A

Attempt to define obscenity (freedom of speech)

22
Q

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A

State law cannot ban abortion (privacy)

23
Q

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

A

Dealth penalty must be individual, not auomatic (8 amd.)

24
Q

UC Regents v. Bakke (1978)

A

No race-based quotas (equal protection)

25
Q

Edwards v. Aguilard (1987)

A

A law cannot require teaching of “creation science” (freedom of religion)

26
Q

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

A

Symbolic is protected (flag burning) (freedom of speech)

27
Q

Reno v. ACLU (1997)

A

A law cannot ban “indecent language” (freedom of speech)

28
Q

Zelburn v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

A

Vouchers to parents are okay (freedom of religion)

29
Q

Atkins v. Virginia (2002)

A

No execution of the retarded (8 amd.)

30
Q

Gritted v. Bollinger (2003)

A

Race CAN be a factor in admissions, but not a preference (equal protection)

31
Q

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

A

No sodomy laws (privacy)

32
Q

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

A

No death penalty for minors (8 amd.)

33
Q

Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)

A

Federal law can ban partial-birth abortions (privacy)

34
Q

DC v. Heller (2008)

A

Gun ownership independent of militia service (2 amd.)

35
Q

Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee (2010)

A

Independent expenditures by Corp.s/Unions are ok (freedom of speech)

36
Q

Holder c. Humanitarian Law Project (2010)

A

Absolutely no help to terrorists (patriot act) (freedom of speech)