Civil Procedure Flashcards
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Power of the court to decide this kind of case
Federal Courts: Limited SMJ
State Courts: Unlimited SMJ
Pleading SMJ
Must be affirmatively pleaded in every case
Waiver of SMJ
Lack of SMJ cannot be waived by failing to object or by affirmative consent
Objection to SMJ
Can be raised by any party at any time
Can be brought for the first time on appeal
Federal Question Jurisdiction
Exists for a claim arising under federal law
Well-Pleaded complaint
The face of the complaint must show that plaintiff’s claim is based on federal law.
Presence of a federal defense does not matter
Diversity Jurisdiction
Cases between citizens of different states, or citizens of a state and a foreign country, if the amount in controversy EXCEEDS $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs
EXCEPTIONS: Probate and domestic relations actions cannot be brought in federal court under diversity jurisdiction
Complete Diversity
Every citizenship represented on the plaintiff’s side of the case must be different than every citizenship on the defendant’s side
Minimal Diversity
Provided by a few statutes
Exists when any plaintiff is diverse from any defendant
Permitted in:
- Federal Interpleader Act
- Class Actions With Claims more than $500
- Interstate Mass Torts
Time for Determination of Diversity
Must exist when the complaint is filed
Individual Citizenship
Citizen of the state or country of domicile
Domicile is permanent residence.
Can have only one domicile at a time.
Residence + An intention to remain indefinitely
Citizenship of Aliens
Diversity jurisdiction exists for controversies between a citizen of a state and a citizen of a foreign country
Citizenship of Representative Parties
Generally, the citizenship of the representative party controls
Except:
- Citizenship of decedent
- Citizenship of infant or incompetent person
Class Action Citizenship
Citizenship of the named (representative) parties counts
Class members not named may join without regard to citizenship
Citizenship of Corporations
Citizen of:
- The state, states, or countries in which it is incorporated; and
- The state or country of its principal place of business (“nerve center”)
Citizenship of Partnership and Unincorporated Associations
Citizen of every state of which its members are citizens
Applies to: unions, trade associations, partnerships, and limited partnership
Devices to Create or Destroy Diversity
Actions that create or defeat diversity are permitted as long as they are not fraudulent.
Moving: permitted as long as genuine
Assignment of Claim: permitted so long as the assignment is complete and real and not collusive
Amount in Controversey
Any good faith allegation will suffice. Case will only be dismissed for a failure to meet the AIC when it appears to a legal certainty that recovery in excess of $75,000 cannot be had
(Diversity Only)
Aggregation of Claims
Plaintiff can aggregate all his claims against the defendant to meet the AIC requirement.
Plaintiff can aggregate claims of multiple defendants if they are jointly liable, other wise plaintiff cannot add up his claims against multiple defendants.
Each plaintiff’s claims must meet the AIC requirement unless there is supplemental jurisdicition
Supplemental Jurisdiction
Allows a federal court with subject matter jurisdiction over a case to hear additional claims over which the court would not independently have jurisdiction if ALL the claims constitute the same case or controversy (common nucleus of operative fact)
If one plaintiff has a claim exceeding $75,00, the claims of additional plaintiffs can be heard regardless of the amount if all the claims:
- Arise out of the same transaction or occurrence; and
- Complete diversity is maintained
Diversity and Counterclaims
Compulsory counterclaims do not have to meet the jurisdictional minimum of $75,000 (arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the main claim)
Permissive counterclaims do
Supplemental Cross Claims
Claim by plaintiff against another plaintiff, or by a defendant against a co-defendant
Cross-claim and main claim must share a common nucleus of operative fact
Multiple Plaintiffs/Permissive Joinder/ Class Action
If the claim of one diverse plaintiff against Defendant A satisfies the jurisdictional amount, other diverse plaintiffs who have related claims against Defendant A sharing a common nucleus of operative fact can also be heard even if their claims do not satisfy the jurisdictional minimum
Supplemental Jurisdiction NOT Permitted
These additional claims/parties can be brought into a diversity action only if the additional claims maintain complete diversity and exceed $75,000:
- Claims by plaintiffs against impleaded under Rule 14;
- Claims by plaintiffs against additional defendants joined as necessary parties under Rules 19 and 20;
- Claims by plaintiff intervenors under Rule 24;
- Claims by plaintiffs joined involuntarily under Rule 19
Removal Terminology
Removal moves a case from state court to federal court
Transfer moves case from one federal court to another federal court
No procedure for removal of a case from federal court to state court
Removal Jurisdiction
Removal is proper only if the case could have been brought originally in federal court.
Only defendants may remove.
ALL defendants must consent to removal.
Case had to have come within original jurisdiction of the federal court
Removal: Federal Question
Well-pleaded complain rule
If the well-pleaded complaint discloses that the plaintiff’s claim is based on federal law, then the defendant ay remove to federal court
Removal: Diversity
Removal based on diversity jurisdiction is only proper if:
- There is complete diversity;
- The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000; and
- The action is brought in a state of which no defendant is a citizen.
Must remove within one-year of the commencement of the action in state court, unless the plaintiff has acted in bad faith to try to make the case non-removable
Removal Procedures
A notice of removal is filed in the federal court, copy to the state court
When the removal notice is filed, the case is removed automatically; the state court’s jurisdiction ceases
Improper Removal
Plaintiff can file a petition for remand
Federal court holds hearing to determine whether removal is proper.
- If proper, remand denied
- If improper, remand is granted
Personal Jurisdiction
Concerns the power of the court to adjudicate the rights and liabilities of this defendant
Types of Personal Jurisdiction
In personam: against the person
In rem: against the thing
Quasi in rem: “sort of” against the thing
Constitutional Aspect of Personal Jurisdiction
Due process requires minimum contacts between the defendant and the forum state such that it is consistent with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice to sue the defendants here.
Look for purposeful availment by the defendant of the protections of the forum’s law
Waiver of Personal Jurisdiction
Can be waived by substantial participation on the merits before raising the objection.
Federal rules: defect must be raised at first opportunity or it is waived
In Personam Federal Exeptions
Federal Interpleader Act
Bulge Provision
Bulge Provision
Allows service anywhere within 100 miles of the federal courthouse, even if in another state.
Two situations:
- impleading third-party defendants under Rule 14; and
- joining necessary parties under Rule 19
General In Personam Jurisdiction
The defendant can be sued on any claim whatsoever, even if it is unrelated to the defendant’s contacts with the forum state
Bases for General In Personam Jurisdiction
- Physical Presence
- Domicile
- Consent
Specific In Personam Jurisdiction
Determined by a state’s long-arm statute
Only applies when the dispute arises out of that contact with the forum
Common Bases for Specific In Personam Jurisdiction
- Any act or omission in the state causing injury to a person or property here or elsewhere
- Any act or omission outside the state causing injury to a person or property here, provided that the defendant conducted activities here or introduced goes into the flow of commerce
- An claim arising out of a contract to perform services in the state or to pay someone in the state to perform services elsewhere, or out of the actual performance
- Any claim arising out of a contract to ship goods to or from the state, or arising out of the shipment of such goods
- Any claim regarding local property
- Any action against a director or officer of a domestic corporation
- Any contract of insurance where the plaintiff is a resident of the state where the claim arose
In Rem Jurisdiction
Suit against any kind of property, real or personal, so long as the property is located in that state
Notice and Service of Process: General
Service of a summons on the defendant while the defendant is in the jurisdiction
Establishes the physical presence of the defendant in the jurisdiction and gives the defendant notice of the action
Federal Rules for Service of Process on an Individual
- Personal Delivery
- Leaving the summons at the defendant’s dwelling or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion
- Delivery of the summons to an authorized agent
Persons in foreign countries: registered mail, return receipt requested
Special Rules for Service of Process
Infant: on infant and parent/guardian
Adjudicated Incompetent: on incompetent and guardian
Partnership: on general partner, attorney in fact, or authorized agent
Corporation: on officer, director, managing agent, or an agent appointed for receiving service of process
Non-resident motorists: on state official who forwards a copy to the out-of-state defendant
Service of Process for In Rem and Quasi-in-Rem Actions
Must make a diligent effort to locate all claimants to the property and serve them personally
If the claimants cannot be located, then notice by publication is permitted
Venue
Asks where among the courts in this judicial system is the appropriate place to hear the case
Venue Waiver
Failure to make timely objection results in waiver.
Under federal law, claim of improper venue must be made at the first opportunity or it is waived
- pre-trial motion to dismiss; or
- the answer
Venue General Rule
Federal venue is proper in a district:
- Where any defendant resides, if ALL defendants reside in the same state; or
- Where the claim arose
If neither of the above, any district where the defendant has been served
Where does a defendant reside?
(Venue purposes)
For individuals, residence means domicile
For business entities, resides in every district in which personal jurisdiction exists
Venue Special Provisions
For a case begun in state court and removed to federal court, venue is automatically proper in the federal district where the state court sits, even if that district would not have been proper originally
Transfer
Generally, transfer is only to a district with proper venue, unless all parties agree otherwise.
A case brought in a district with proper venue may be transferred for convenience to another district with proper venue
A case brought in a district without proper venue may be transferred to a district with proper venue or dismissed by the court
Transfer Choice of Words
If suit was brought in a district with proper venue and the case is transferred to another district, the law of the transferor forum controls.
If suit was brought in a district without proper venue and transferred to another district, the law of the transferree court controls
The Erie Doctrine
In a diversity case, a federal court applies state substantive law.
State Substantive Law
Includes
- Substantive rules on what must be proved to win a case and what defenses may be asserted
- Statute of limitations on state causes of actions
- The Burdens of Proof of state claims or defenses; and
- State Rules on choice of law
Federal Procedures
The FRCP always apply in federal court.
No Federal Statute or Rule on Point
Consult twin aims of Erie:
- To avoid forum shopping; and
- To avoid inequitable administration of justice
- If choice of procedure would be outcome determinative, federal court should apply state law to prevent forum shopping
- The role of the jury in federal court is entirely controlled by federal law
Federal Common Law
Overrides any inconsistent state or local law/rule
Made only when important federal interest not covered by a statute is encountered
e.g. state boundary disputes and claim preclusion