Civil Procedure 42-46 Flashcards
In California courts, in a personal injury case, when can a defendant demand a physical examination of the plaintiff as a matter of right?
If:
The examination doesn’t include any diagnostic test or procedure that is painful, protracted, or intrusive; AND
The exam is conducted at a location within 75 miles of the examinee’s residence.
*For non-personal injury cases, a party must make a motion to compel to perform an exam. (Must be made in good faith and show the party’s health is in controversy).
Priority: Medium
In Federal Court, the court MUST permit Intervention as of Right if the non-party can demonstrate what?
That:
The application to intervene is timely;
It has an interest in the subject matter of the action;
The protection of this interest would be impaired because of the action; AND
The non-party’s interest is not adequately represented by existing parties to the litigation.
Priority: N/A
If Intervention as of Right is NOT warranted, a court MAY still allow Permissive Intervention when?
If the non-party:
Files a timely motion; AND
Either:
Has a claim or defense that shares a common question of law or fact with the main action; OR
Is given a conditional right to intervene by a federal statute.
*Courts will consider if the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original party’s rights.
Priority: N/A
Class Actions
When can one or more members sue on behalf of an entire class?
The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable (numerosity);
There are questions of law or fact in common to the class (commonality);
The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims/defenses of the class (typicality); AND
The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class (adequacy of representation).
Priority: N/A
Class Actions
Once the class action requirements are met, the class will be certified when?
If:
Separate actions would create a risk of inconsistent adjudications or harm the interest of other members;
The party opposing the class has acted/refused to act on grounds that apply to the class and the grounds of relief would be appropriate to the class as a whole; OR
Common questions of law/fact to the class predominate over questions affecting individual members and a class action is superior to other methods of adjudication.
Priority: N/A