Civil Procedure 36-46 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the two-part test (under Twombly and Iqbal) that a Federal Court will apply to determine whether a Complaint is sufficiently well pleaded?

A

Part 1: The court will disregard any conclusory allegations.

Part 2: Taking all remaining factual allegations as true, they will determine whether the facts as alleged would make it plausible for the party to succeed in obtaining the relief sought.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must be plead for a well-pleaded Complaint alleging fraud or mistake?

A

The circumstances constituting fraud or mistake must be alleged with particularity (specific facts must be alleged).

Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person’s mind can be alleged generally.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when maymultiple plaintiffs join in one action (Permissive Joinder)?

A

If:

Joint and several relief is asserted by them OR the claim arises out of the same transaction or occurrence;

A common question of law or fact to all plaintiffs exist; AND

Subject matter jurisdiction exists for each claim.

*The process is similar for multiple defendants.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many claims may a party bring against an opposing party?

A

As many claims as it has, EVEN if they are unrelated or do not have a common nucleus of operative fact.

If the claims are brought in Federal Court: at least one of the claims must satisfy Subject Matter Jurisdiction.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A party MUST be joined in an action if that party is necessary AND joinder is feasible.

When is a party necessary?

A

A party is necessary if:

The court cannotgrant complete relief without the absent party;

The absent party has an interest in the action that would be impaired or impeded if that person is not joined; OR

The party’s absence would leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of multiple liability or inconsistent obligations.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A party MUST be joined in an action if that party is necessary AND joinder is feasible.

When is joinder feasible?

A

When:

Joinder will notremove subject matter jurisdiction; AND

The court has personal jurisdiction over the necessary party.

*If joinder isn’t feasible, the court will consider whether to continue or dismiss the action.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In California courts, in a personal injury case, when can a defendant demand a physical examination of the plaintiff as a matter of right?

A

If:

The examination doesn’t include any diagnostic test or procedure that is painful, protracted, or intrusive; AND

The exam is conducted at a location within 75 miles of the examinee’s residence.

*For non-personal injury cases, a party must make a motion to compel to perform an exam. (Must be made in good faith and show the party’s health is in controversy).

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Federal Court, the court MUST permit Intervention as of Right if the non-party can demonstrate what?

A

That:

The application to intervene is timely;

It has an interest in the subject matter of the action;

The protection of this interest would be impaired because of the action; AND

The non-party’s interest is not adequately represented by existing parties to the litigation.

Priority: N/A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If Intervention as of Right is NOT warranted, a court MAY still allow Permissive Intervention when?

A

If the non-party:

Files a timely motion; AND

Either:

Has a claim or defense that shares a common question of law or fact with the main action; OR

Is given a conditional right to intervene by a federal statute.

*Courts will consider if the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original party’s rights.

Priority: N/A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Class Actions

When can one or more members sue on behalf of an entire class?

A

The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable (numerosity);

There are questions of law or fact in common to the class (commonality);

The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims/defenses of the class (typicality); AND

The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class (adequacy of representation).

Priority: N/A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Class Actions

Once the class action requirements are met, the class will be certified when?

A

If:

Separate actions would create a risk of inconsistent adjudications or harm the interest of other members;

The party opposing the class has acted/refused to act on grounds that apply to the class and the grounds of relief would be appropriate to the class as a whole; OR

Common questions of law/fact to the class predominate over questions affecting individual members and a class action is superior to other methods of adjudication.

Priority: N/A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly