Civil Procedure Flashcards
preliminary injunction
(i) Notice: P gave notice / D has opp’y to attend hearing
(ii) likelihood of success on merits
(iii) irreparable harm will occur if prelim injunction is not given
(iv) ‘balancing the equities’ comes out in favor of granting (benefit to P vs. harm to D)
(v) granting is in the best interest of the public
temporary restraining order
(i) immediate & irreparable harm would occur if court doesn’t issue
(ii) why they couldn’t give notice
NOTE: 14 days max
timing to file an appeal
30 days
CAFA requirements
(i) at least 100 members
(ii) damages that exceed $5 million
(iii) minimal diversity (at least one P diverse from one D)
statutory interpleader
Under Federal Interpleader Act:
(i) Nationwide PJ
(ii) The “Bulge Provision” allows the area for service of process to “bulge” to within 100 miles of federal courthouse, even if it crosses state lines
(iii) the AIC $500+
(iv) diversity btw any adverse claimants
claim preclusion
(i) same parties
(ii) same claims
(iii) final judgment on the merits
NOTE: law of the forum determines preclusive effect of judgment
issue preclusion
(i) same issue;
(ii) actually litigated;
(iii) final judgment on the merits;
(iv) issue essential to prior action
(v) party against whom issue preclusion is asserted was a party to prior action
pre-trial disclosures
— witnesses (name, address, phone # of those testifying and those that will testify if need arises)
— depositions to be presented
— exhibits (those will offer and those that will be offered if need arises
standards of appellate review
personal jurisdiction for out-of-state defendant
(i) did D purposefully avail themselves of the benefit of the forum state and/or was it reasonably foreseeable that they would be called into State B’s courts?
(ii) is exercising PJ over D consistent with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?
——(consider resources of D; ease of transportation and communication”)
modes of properly serving process
(a) personal
(b) D’s place of abode w/ person of suitable age & discretion who lives there
(c) on D’s agent
(d) another method under state law
requirements for a rule 23 class action
(i) the class must be so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable (numerosity);
(ii) there must be questions of law or fact that are common to the class (commonality);
(iii) the claims or defenses of the representatives must be typical of the class (typicality);
(iv) the representatives must fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class (adequacy).
Erie analysis
[See flowchart on p. 25 of “outlines by subject” document]
14-day deadlines
- File answer after pre-answer motion denied
- File third-party complaint without leave after original answer served
- Respond to amended pleading
- Submit proposed discovery plan & initial disclosures after initial conference
- Demand jury trial after last pleading served
21-day deadlines
- Serve answer or pre-answer motion after service of complaint, counterclaim, or crossclaim
- Amend pleading as matter of course after pleading was served
- Serve reply to answer
- Hold initial conference before scheduling order is due
28-day deadlines
(most post-trial filings)
- Renew JMOL
- Move for new trial
- Move to alter or amend judgment
- Move to amended findings after final judgment
30-day deadlines
(most discovery deadlines)
- File notice of removal after receipt of initial pleading
- Move to remand after notice of removal filed
- Submit pretrial disclosures before trial (e.g., which experts are testifying, etc)
- Respond to interrogatories, requests for production & requests for admission
- Move for summary judgment after close of discovery
- File notice of appeal
60-day deadlines
- answer or pre-answer motion after service waived (domestic)
- answer after service of process on U.S. agency or employee
90-day deadlines
- Serve process after complaint is filed
- File answer or pre-answer motion after foreign service waived
- Disclose expert witness materials before trial
Rule 11 sanctions
— document is presented for proper purpose—not to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase cost of litigation
— claims, defenses & legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous argument for revising or establishing law
— factual assertions have or will have evidentiary support and
— factual denials are warranted by evidence or reasonably based on belief/lack of information
who can you serve interrogatories on?
Only a party to the litigation
what makes something discoverable
(i) relevant to any claim or defense
(ii) proportional to needs of the case
discoverability of expert witnesses
information held by an expert witness expected to testify at trial is generally non-privileged and discoverable
facts known and opinions held by an expert notexpected to testify are privileged and not discoverable unless:
— that information relates to a court-ordered physical or mental examinationor
— exceptional circumstances make it impracticable to obtain that information by other means—eg, a party dies and cannot be evaluated.
Types of required disclosures and timing
Initial disclosures (14 days after pretrial conference)
Expert testimony (90 days before trial)
Pretrial disclosures (30 days before trial)