Civil Procedure Flashcards

1
Q

Personal Jurisdiction:
-traditional

A

D domiciled in the forum; personally served while present in the forum’ express or implied consent to jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Personal Jurisdiction:
Long Arm Statute

A

assume the stature reaches the constitutional limit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Personal Jurisdiction:
constitutional analysis: definition

A

does the D have such minimum contacts with the forum so that the exercise of jurisdiction doesn’t offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

My Parents Frequently Forgot to Read Children’s Stories

A

-minimum contacts if: purposeful availment + foreseeability
-fairness: relatedness + convenience + state’s interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Personal Jurisdiction:
relatedness

A

-specific = D’s specific contact with the forum
-general = D corp must be “at home” in the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Subject Matter Jurisdiction:
-diversity

A

diversity: complete diversity + amt in controversy > $75k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

aggregation

A

ok to aggregate claims of one P against one D, but not 2 claims by 2 or more Ps against 2 or more Ds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

federal question

A

“arises under” federal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

supplemental jurisdiction

A

“common nucleus of operative fact”
BUT, P cannot use suppl juris. in a diversity case solely to overcome a lack of diversity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

refusal

A

Fed Q is dismissed early on; state claim is complex; state law issue predominates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

removal

A

-D can remove if case could have been heard in Fed. Court under subj. matter juris.
*all Ds must agree
*no removal by P, if more than 1 year passed since the case was filed, or in a diversity case where any D is a citizen of the forum.
*once D files permissive counterclaim in state court, he can’t remove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Venue:
-local action

A

anything re: land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

transitory

A

-district in which ALL Ds reside; if same state but diff districts then any district where one resides; OR substantial part of claim arose
*Corp resides anywhere it does business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

transfer

A

-Consider convenience of parties and Ws and interest of justice:
-public factors re: applicable law, what community should bear the burden of jury service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

forum nonconveniens

A

-far more appropriate court exists elsewhere (the Court would then dismiss w/o prejudice or stays the case):
—location of Ws and evidence; undue hardship for D; availability of adequate alternative forums; use of judicial resources; public policy
*applicable when transfer is impossible bc the court is in diff judicial system, but NEVER granted if P is a resident of the forum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Service:

A

-summons and complaint; personal service OR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

substituted service

A

-left with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

service on agent

A

Delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to an agent authorized to receive service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

waiver my mail

A

process mailed to D; formal service waived if returned in 30 days. If no return, personal or sub service is required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

immunity

A

if in the state as a W or a party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

timing

A

-must serve the D within 90 days after complaint filed, or Court must dismiss with prejudice unless P shows good cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Which law governs the dispute?:
-Erie Doctrine

A

-in diversity and suppl. juris. cases, the Federal Court must apply state substantive law: SoL; choice of law rules; elements of claim/defense; rules on tolling SoL
*BUT the Court uses Federal Procedural Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

process to analyze substantive law

A

-analyze if outcome determinative (SL); balance of interest; avoid forum shopping (SL)
*if Fed law conflicts, Fed. law prevails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Interlocutory Injunctions:
-preliminary injunction

A

-preserves status quo pending determination of merits of litigation
*must provide notice to adverse party
*must show: (1) imminent irreparable injury (non-monetary); (2) no adequate legal remedy;
(3) substantial likelihood of success on the merits;
(4) a balance of the hardships;
(5) not adverse to public interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
temporary retraining order
-preserves the status quo of subject matter of litigation, and prevents irreparable harm until PI hearing *must provide notice UNLESS: (i) immediate and irreparable injury; (ii) effort to give notice; and (iii) provide security in case party wrongfully restrained/enjoined *must show same elements as PI *lasts 14 days unless an extension is granted
26
Proper Pleadings? -Rule 11
-attorney must sign all pleadings, etc. to certify that: (i) no improper purpose; (ii) legal contentions are warranted by law; (iii) factual contentions and denials have evidentiary support *can be raised by opposing party w/in 21 day safe harbor OR by court sua sponte
27
the claim
-must plead FACTS supporting plausible claim enough to put D on notice and prepare reasonable response *(Iqbal/Twombly standard) + basis of Subj. matter juris + demand for relief
28
D Response
-must be within 21 days of service: can be motion for more def statement/motion to strike; Motion or Answer. -waivable: lack of personal juris; improper venue; insufficient service of process -non-waivable: failure to state a claim, failure to join indispensable party; lack of SMJ
29
requirements for the Answer
-must respond (admit, deny, lack of info) + raise any affirmative defenses (SoL, SoF, res judicata, self defense)
30
right to amend
-P once within 21 days after D serves first response -D once within 21 days after D serves answer -if no right, seek leave of the court (the court will consider delay, prejudice, futility)
31
supplemental
-pertains to matters that occur after initial pleading -permission from the court REQUIRED
32
Defendant's Claims: -counterclaims/Cross complaint against P
-compulsory if arises from the same transaction or occurrence
33
cross claim / cross complaint against co-D
permissive if arising from the same transaction or occurrence or under supplemental juris.
34
impleader if by D/Cross Complaint against 3rd Party
-NO diversity required for 3rd party practice between 3rd party D and 3rd party P
35
Joinder: Are Proper Parties Before the Court? -permissive
-arise under the same transaction or occurrence + raise 1 common question
36
compulsory
(1) complete relief can't be given to existing parties without them; (2) disposition in party's absence may impair their ability to protect their own interest; or (3) their absence would expose existing parties to double or inconsistent obligations
37
how to join the party?
-if feasible, PJ+SMJ (keep diversity) (discretion of the court -if unfeasible, the court can choose to proceed without them -look at alternative forum; actual likelihood of prejudice; whether court can shape relief to avoid prejudice; whether P will be deprived of adequate remedy
38
Intervention: -of right -permissive
-of right: applicant has an interest in the property or transaction and action without him may impair ability to protect his interest -permissive: applicant's claim or defense and the main action have a common question of fact in common; must have own jurisdiction
39
Claims: -federal impleader
Join a 3rd party for indemnity / contribution on underlying claim
40
interpleader
-instituted by P to determine who has a valid claim to the stake -under federal rule, interpleader must follow regular federal question or diversity rules -under statutory rules, interpleader has special, simpler standards: diversity between one claimant and $500 in issue, service nationwide and venue properly where any claimant resides
41
Class Action:
-subject matter juris. required -requirements: (Nobody Can Touch Rocky's Apple): Numerosity; Commonality; Typicality; and Representative is Adequate
42
types
-prejudice: class treatment is necessary to avoid harm to class member or party opposing class; Injunction / Declaratory Judgment: class members are treated alike by other party; -Damages (most likely ex. mass tort): (i) common questions predominate; (ii) class action is superior
43
Class Action: Notification
-if damages class action: notify all identifiable members that they can opt out, otherwise bound if they don't *they can enter a separate appearance; the class representative pays
44
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
-federal question or diversity -if diversity, only look to rep, no one else in the class -traditional: rep has complete diversity from Ds + Rep's claim > $75k; -Class Action Fairness Act: Subj. matter juris. if any class member is diverse from any D + more than 100 class member + aggregate claim of more than $5mil
45
settlement of class action
-requires court approval; notice to the class; 2nd chance to opt out
46
Discovery: -required disclosures
-duty to produce without request: (1) Initial Disclosures (ID people and docs likely to have discoverable info; computation of damages; insurance coverage) (2) list of experts; (3) pretrial: detailed info about trial evidence at least 30 days before trial
47
discovery: scope
-relevant: reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence; must be relevant to the claim or defense -proportional: must be proportional to the needs of the case *the benefit outweighs the burden
48
depositions
-non-parties subpoenaed; parties require notice
49
interrogatories
limited to 25 total; 30 days to respond
50
request to produce
30 days to respond
51
requests for admission
30 days to respond
52
physical / mental exam
court order required
53
duty to supplement
if incomplete or incorrect, response must be supplemented
54
sanctions
-partial or total violation -cost or contempt + extreme sanction for extreme violations: monetary sanction; strike pleadings; disallow evidence; dismiss; default judgment
55
privilege
-work product / attorney work product : mental impressions, conclusions, legal theories, opinions
56
e-discovery
-no need to produce ESI if party shows not reasonably accessible bc undue burden, but court may order production + cost sharing/shifting
57
-authentication of e-discovery -failure to preserve electronic info
-authentication: may use metadata to authenticate -failure to preserve: must take reasonable steps to preserve ESI if litigation is anticipated -if the data is lost + prejudice to the other party + intent to deprive the other party of the data = Court may (i) presume or instruct jury it may/must presume lost data unfavorable to party; or (ii) dismiss action or enter default judgment
58
Adjudication Without a Trial: -voluntary dismissal
-P can voluntarily dismiss before D serves an answer or motion w/o prejudice
59
involuntary dismissal
-fail to prosecute, or abide Court order
60
failure to state a claim (12(b)(6))
-alleged facts must support legally recognized claim -assumes all allegations are true, and only looks at the face of the complaint
61
summary judgment
-The moving pary: must show no genuine dispute of material fact -The opposing party: show that a triable issue exists *the evidence is looked as in the light most favorable to the non-moving party
62
Pre-trial Conferences: -in general
-the Court may hold as many as needed to expedite the case and facilitate settlement
63
-pre-trial order
controls the course of action taken in the conference
64
-final pretrial conference
-the Court may use to formulate the trial plan -held close to trial date, may be modified by the Court only to prevent manifest injustice
65
sanctions
-failure to attend the conference or obey the order, being substantially unprepared, acting in bad faith
66
Verdicts and Judgments: -recovery
-if default, recovery is limited to amount sought in the complaint
67
jury trial
-7th Amendment right to jury trial in civil cases as to legal relief -the Court decides equitable relief
68
voir dire
-unlimited strikes for cause; each side gets 3 preemptory -6-12 jurors, no alternates -requires an unanimous verdict
69
jury verdicts -general -special -general with special interrogatories
-general: finds in favor of P or D completely, gives amount of damages -special: jury makes a finding on all issues of material fact submitted to them, the court applies the law -general w/ special interrogatories: jury answers factual questions to ensure the general verdict is valid
70
motion for judgement as a matter of law / directed verdict
-D moves at the close of P's evidence and close of all evidence -P only move at close of all evidence *standard: reasonable people couldn't disagree
71
renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law
*must bring motion for judgment as a matter of law FIRST -claim that jury verdict is not reasonable -within 28 days of entry of judgment -same standard as motion for judgment as matter of law
72
motion for a new trial: grounds
grounds: prejudicial error making judgment unfair; new evidence that couldn't have been obtained with due diligence; prejudicial misconduct; judgment is against the weight of the evidence; excessive/inadequate damages that SHOCKS the CONSCIENCE (remittitur: jury award is too large, P chooses lesser figure or new trial)
73
Appealability and Review: -appeal
-file in the trial court within 30 days of entry of judgment
74
final judgment rule
-Decision on final merits of the claim; All Ds must agree -Dnial of motion for summ. jug.; grant for new trial; grant to remand to state court: then NO FJ -Denial of new trial; grant or deny renewed motion for judgment as matter of law: then YES FJ *default judgment that does not dispose of all claims among all parties: NO FJ unless directed by Court
75
interlocutory review: -as of right
-as of right: orders re: injunctions, receivers, property possession; admiralty, patent infringement, grant/deny class certification
76
interlocutory review: -discretionary
-discretionary: but Court may review interlocutory orders only if: (i) the order involves controlling question of law, (ii) substantial ground for differing opinion; (iii) immediate appeal may advance ultimate termination of case; (iv) Court of appeals allows appeal
77
Extraordinary Writs: -types
-writ of mandate: compel lower court to do something that the law requires -writ of prohibition: to stop a lower Court from doing something that the law doesn't allow
78
Extraordinary Writs: -requirements
-the party will suffer irreparable harm if the writ is not issued, eg. unusually harsh or unfair; -normal appellate route is inadequate; -party has beneficial interest in the outcome
79
Is the Decision Binding in Future Cases: -Res Judicata: Claim Preclusion
-Claimant won case 1: res judicata merges the cases -Claimant lost Case 1: res judicata bars the case -requirements: (i) same parties; (ii) ended in valid final judgment on the merits; (iii) assert the same cause of action / claim
80
Is the Decision Binding in Future Cases: -Collateral Estoppel: Issue Preclusion
(i) Against someone who was a party in Case 1; (ii) Case 1 ended in valid, final judgement on the merits; (iii) Issue was actually litigated and determined; (iv) Issue essential to the judgment
81
Collateral estoppel: who asserts?
-traditional: mutuality required -modern: non-mutuality -defensive: D can assert if P was a party to a prior case, but only if P had full chance to litigate -non-mutuality offensive: P can assert against D if not "unfair": full and fair opportunity to litigate; party could foresee multiple suits; P couldn't have been joined easily; no inconsistent judgments on record