Civil Procedure Flashcards
Personal jurisdiction can be ___ or ___.
General (obtained by consent, presence, or domicile); specific.
If the MEE fact pattern discusses a case that takes place in federal court, start your essay as follows:
Federal district courts may exercise personal jurisdiction to the same extent as the courts of general jurisdiction of the state in which the district court sits.
If the MEE issue is specific jurisdiction, state:
State courts of general jurisdiction may exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants to the extent authorized by both the state’s long-arm statute and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits states to assert personal jurisdiction over nonresident defendants who have established minimum contacts with the state such that the exercise of personal jurisdictions would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Minimum contacts are established by personal availment such that being hailed into the state’s court is foreseeable.
Subject matter jurisdiction is
The power of a court to hear a certain type of case
Federal courts are courts of ___ jurisdiction.
Limited—that is, they can only hear certain types of cases.
Three categories of federal subject-matter jurisdiction:
Federal question
Diversity
Supplemental
Federal question jurisdiction
A federal question must appear on the face of plaintiff’s well-pleaded complaint.
It cannot appear in the answer, nor can plaintiff merely anticipate a federal defense in its complaint.
Diversity jurisdiction
Requires (1) complete diversity of citizenship between the plaintiffs and defendants and (2) the amount in controversy must be over $75,000.
Note: complete diversity is not required for class actions under CAFA—minimal diversity suffices.
A person is domiciled:
Where it is her permanent home and where she intends to remain indefinitely.
A corporation is domiciled:
Where it is incorporated (may be more than one state) and the one state in which it has its principal place of business—nerve center.
Supplemental jurisdiction
Same nucleus of operative facts. There must first be one claim with SMJ.
A plaintiff cannot use supplemental jurisdiction to add a claim against a non diverse party if the sole basis for SMJ is diversity.
Removal
Defendants (NOT plaintiffs) may remove an action from state court to the federal court that geographically embraces it if the plaintiff could have initially brought the case in federal court.
A defendant may not remove a case if he is sued in his home state and the only basis for removal is diversity.
Venue is proper in a district where
(1) any defendant resides if all defendants reside in the same state,
(2) in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or
(3) a substantial part of property that is subject to the action is situated.
A corporate defendant resides in any judicial district in which it is subject to PJ at the time the action is commenced.
Venue transfer
The federal court has authority to transfer a case to another federal district for the convenience of the parties and in the interest of justice. The new forum must have SMJ and PJ. The court will apply the law of the transferor forum.
A motion to transfer to a more appropriate forum should be denied if the case could not have been filed there to begin with.
Motion for summary judgment—rule 56
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) allows a summary judgment motion to be granted only if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
A motion for summary judgment may be supported by depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations, admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials.
Burdens of proof for motion for summary judgment
The moving party must produce evidence to show there is no genuine issue of material fact.
The burden then shifts to the non-moving party, which must then produce evidence to show that there is a genuine dispute of material fact.
The evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the non moving party.
TRO
A TRO can be issued without notice to the adverse party.
To secure a TRO without notice, the plaintiff needs to show a risk of immediate and irreparable injury.
The TRO only lasts long enough for the court to consider and resolve a request, but not longer than 14 days (unless the court extends it for good cause or the adverse party consents to an extension).
TROs last until the court decides whether to grant a preliminary injunction.
Preliminary injunctions
Equitable relief with the objective of preserving the status quo. If granted, the matter must be tried within six months unless the parties stipulate or good cause is shown.
The court must give notice to the adverse party.
Four factors to consider (HELP): (1) Harm—significance of the threat of irreparable harm to the plaintiff if the judgment is not granted; (2) Evaluation of injuries—balance between this harm and the injury that granting the injunction would inflict on the defendant; (3) Likelihood of prevailing on the merits for plaintiff; and (4) Public interest.
Work product
Any material prepared in anticipation of litigation.
Written statements given by witnesses might be discoverable even if they are considered work product if the other party can show substantial need and undue hardship. However, an attorney’s mental impressions are never discoverable.
___ are generally appealable and ___ are generally not appealable.
Final judgments; non-final judgments
Exceptions: when there are final orders in cases involving multiple claims and multiple parties and some are still pending—the other parties may be able to appeal their orders; orders involving injunctions, garnishments, and other temporary remedies; interlocutors orders by leave; orders constituting a final judgment on collateral matters.
Issue preclusion
Issues that were actually litigated and decided and essential to the judgment in a previous case cannot be litigated again.
Claim preclusion
A claim that has been litigated to a final judgment on the merits cannot be re litigated by the parties (or their privies).
An action filed in state court may be removed to:
The federal court embracing the state court
To remove a case from state to federal court,
The defendant must file a notice of removal with the federal district court, give written notice of that filing to all adverse parties, and file a copy of the notice of removal with the state court.
Minimum contacts analysis for PJ:
- Did defendant purposefully avail himself of the forum such that he could reasonably foresee being hailed into court there?
- Would exercise of PJ offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?
Challenges to personal jurisdiction:
Must be done by motion or by answer to the complaint—it must be the first pleading and be asserted in a timely manner.
Is an appearance in the action a waiver of the right to object to personal jurisdiction?
No
The plaintiff has ___ days after ____ to effect service of process to the defendant.
90; filing his complaint
Methods of service of process on an individual
- Personal service
- At the person’s usual abode with competent who lives there
- Service on an authorized agent
- Other appropriate state methods of service