Civil Liberties Ch.4 Flashcards
Areas of personal freedom with which governments are constrained from interfering
Civil liberties
*Freedom of religion
*Free exercise of religion
*Freedom of speech and of the press
*Symbolic speech, speech plus, and the rights of assembly and petition
Freedom of the press
The first amendment
The process by which different protections in the bill of rights were incorporated into the fourteenth amendment, thus guaranteeing citizens **protection from state as well as national governments ***
Selective incorporation
The first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1971; they ensure certain rights and liberties to the people
Bill of rights
Says that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” This law means that a “wall of separation” exists between church and state.
Establishment clause
- Lemon v. Kurtzman
- Sante Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000)
- Elk Grov Unified School District v. Newdow (2004)
Establishment clause cases
1st amendment
Government action toward religion is permissible if it is 1.secular in purpose,
- neither promotes nor inhibits the practice of religion,
- And does not lead to “excessive entanglement” with religion.
Lemon test
Protects a citizen’s right to believe and practice whatever religion he or she chooses
Free exercise clause
- Reynolds v. U.S. (1879)
- Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)
Free exercise clause cases
1st amendment
No religion
Secularism
Vietnam war case
Included obscenity and profanity on a t-shirt
Freedom of speech
Court ruled in favor of this mans’ free speech right
Cohen v. California (1971)
Wrote letters telling young men not to go to war
Schenck v. U.S. (1919) WWI
Alien and Sedition act
Wrote letters to people working in factories to strike and not make those guns and equipment for war.
Abrams v. U.S. (1919) WWI
Espionage act
Illegal to criticize US government actions
(This act makes it a crime to say or publish anything that might tend to defame or bring into disrepute the government of the US)
Alien and Sedition Act
Illegal to protest against the war
Opposing US involvement in the war
Espionage Act
Clear and present danger
Schenck v. U.S. (1919) WWI
Bad tendency
Abrams v. U.S. (1919) WWI
Determines whether speech is protected or unprotected based on the capacity to present a “clear and present danger” to society
Clear and present danger test
Vietnam war case
Received a draft card and set it on fire.
What is the name of the case? And what term or phrase describes his actions?
Who did the supreme ct rule in favor of?
- Case: U.S. v. O’Brien (1968)
- He demonstrated symbolic speech or speech plus.
- Supreme ct. Ruled in favor of the U.S.
Speech accompanied by conduct such as sit-ins, picketing, and demonstrations. Protection of this form of speech under the First Amendment is conditional, and restrictions imposed by state or local authorities are acceptable if properly balanced by considerations of public order.
Speech plus
Case about violent speech
People did not want this racist group in neighborhood because they were scaring the citizens by their violent speech.
Supreme ct. Ruled in favor of the group saying no legal action can be taken unless the speech turns into or has to be “imminent lawless actions.”
Supreme ct. Defends his freedom of speech.
Bradenbury v. Ohio (1969)
Case about flag burning
Man protested against The Gulf War by burning a US flag at the courthouse steps in Dallas, TX.
Supreme ct ruling; this man won.
What is this case?
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
Case pertaining to Freedom of the press
Includes falsity ad during the civil war about Dr. Martin Luther King
Dr. King was arrested by an officer
There was an article in the newspaper that stated Dr. Kings’ innocent and discussing the scene and the song that was sung.
The officer claimed it/ (the song and Dr. Kings’ innocent) was malicious and false against the officer.
The supreme ct ruled it was ONLY false and NOT malicious against the officer.
The supreme ct. Ruled in favor this newspaper.
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)
What is the term that refers to both “falsity” and “malice” when it comes to freedom of the press?
(It must include both of these elements in order to be labeled this term)
And is written
Libel
Case pertaining to a joke about a man in a magazine being depicted in such a way that was inappropriate.
The man sued the magazine saying it was false and malicious-libel
The magazines defense was just that: it was a joke
Supreme ct ruled in favor of the magazine
Hustler v. Falwell (1988)