Civil Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are the torts?

A
  • Negligence
  • breach of statutory duty
  • Trespass
  • Nuisance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is civil action?

A

civil action generally involves individuals with a claimant suing a defendant for a remedy or remedies - usually in the form of damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negligence in environmental law

A

waste producers have a duty of care in respect of the handling, storage, treatment and disposal of controlled waste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what can happen following a breach of statutory duty?

A

may result in a criminal prosecution by the enforcing authority

a breach of statuary duty by a defendant may give the claimant a cause of action in tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is Trespass?

A

there must be interference with a persons property rights without lawful excuse. The interference must be intentional or negligence and direct (not consequential)

Case: McDonald v Associated Fuels Ltd (1954)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is nuisance?

A

a breach of a legal duty imposed by the law, or a civil wrong

a common law nuisance is one (apart from statute) violates the principles which the common law lays down for the protection of the public and of individuals in the exercise and enjoyment of their rights

nuisances in common law are private or public

statutory nuisance is covered under the EPA 1990 Part III

Nuisance is not actionable unless there is proof of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duties Owed by Organisations and Occupiers of Land

A

Negligence - Donohuge v Stephenson (1932) - developed the neighbour principle

General Duties - Wilson and Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English (1938) - developed the general duties of an= employer to take reasonable care of their employees from the risks of foreseeable injury, disease or death at work

Current Knowledge - Margereson and Hancock v J.W. Roberts Ltd (1996) - if an employer is aware of, or ought to be,. in the light of current knowledge ….they will be liable ……/

Foreseeability - a defendant is generally responsible for all damage that is a direct consequence of their act

Remoteness - compensation can only be obtained when it is accepted that the injury or damage is not too remote from the original wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are some defences to civil actions?

A
  • no duty owed
  • no breach of duty
  • the breach did not lead to damage
  • lack of foreseeability
  • remoteness of damage
  • volenti non fit injuria
  • necessity
  • contributiory negligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are defences to Breach of Statutory Duty?

A
  • there will bo no action available if the causes of action in tort do not apply
  • if the statutory duty is not absolute, there will be a defence if the employer provided a safety precaution, but the claimant would not on the balance of probabilities have made use of it
  • contributory negligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the defence to Trespass?

A
  • the action must prove directness, The interference with rights must be direct rather than consequential
  • trespass must be intentional or negligence
  • a casual link must be established between the directness of the act and the inevitability of the consequences

Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Southport Corporation (1956)

these defences could be applied to environmental action:
- licence
- rights of entry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the defences to Nuisance?

A
  • prescription - if a same act has been occurring continuously for 20 years (only available to private nuisance)
  • Activities Authorised by a Statutory Authority
  • Act of God - operation of natural forces is unexpected and resultant damage is remote from the incident
  • Act of Stranger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Rule of Ryland v Fletcher Arising from Environmental Pollution

A
  • established the principle of strict civil liability since it was not considered an adequate defence to say that all reasonable steps had been taken to prevent the escape from occurring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When is an action for a civil case excluded

A

usually 6 years from the polluting incident (Limitation Act 1980, Section 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case details the damage of foreseeable type?

A

for the polluter to be liable, the damage caused must be reasonably foreseeable by the polluter

Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather pls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what case produced the principle of date of knowledge’

A

Margereson and Hancock v J.W.Roberts Ltd

the evidence demonstrated that the defendant should have reasonably foreseen a risk of some pulmonary injury in that the company should have known about the risk off asbestos exposure many years before the claimant was born

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Meaning of Strict bLiability

A

the operator is liable for damage which occurs as a result of his operation , whether or not he takes reasonable care to prevent the damage occurring.

17
Q

what is the ‘Act of God’ defence

A

the defence must show that the defendant was merely part of the surrounding circumstances

18
Q

what does retrospective liability mean?

A

operator can be held liable for damage which occurs, or is discovered, at a later date even after he has ceased to operate on the site

19
Q

what is joint liability?

A

each party involved will be responsible their proportion of contributing to the event

20
Q

joint and several liability

A

all parties are considered equally liable for the whole amount of the damages claimed

21
Q

what must be proven for a negligence case to be successful?

A
  • that the defendant was under a duty of care to the claimant/injured party
  • that the duty was breached
  • as a result of that breach the claimant suffered harm and that that that hard suffered being not too remote from the breach
22
Q

what must be proven for a breach of statutory duty case to be successful?

A
  • only is the case falls within the wording of the statute can the victim sue for compensation
  • not all statutory duties give rise to a civil action - the following elements must be proven (on a balance of probabilities)
    > the statute must place the obligation win the defendant
    > the statutory duty was owed to the claimant
    > the injury was a type contemplated by the statute
    > the defendant must be in breach of that duty
    > the breach of the statutory duty must have caused the injury/loss
23
Q

what must be proven for trespass action?

A
  • the interference with rights must be direct rather than consequential
  • trespass must be intentional or negligent
  • a causal link between the directness of an act and the inevitability off the consequences must also be established for trespass to be successful
24
Q

Private nuisance requirements for the complained of action is reasonable

A
  • the extent of the damage
  • the seriousness of the harm
  • the nature of the area
  • the general benefit to the area from the defendants activity
  • the duration of the nuisance
  • any abnormal sensitivity on the part of the clamant
  • whether the nuisance was malicious or in the exercise of a right
25
Q

what re public nuisances and what actions can be taken?

A

a public nuisance must have a direct effect on the public at large

actions in respect of such nuisances can be instituted by the Attorney General, an individual or a Local Authority

Always Consider Ryland’s v Fletcher