CIVIL LAW DOCTRINES - BUENAVENTURA Flashcards
When shall laws take effect?
Laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication in the Official Gazette, or
What does procedural due process demand?
procedural due process demands that administrative rules and regulations, except those which are interpretative ones, should be published to be effective.
What conditions must be met for the waiver of rights to be valid?
Waiver of rights is subject to the condition that it is not contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals, or good customs, or prejudicial to a third person with a right recognized by law.
The Administrative Code, being the latter law, prevails over the Civil Code in the computation of time.
Why does a pro hac vice ruling violate Article 8 and the Constitution?
Pro hac vice ruling violates Article 8 and the Constitution. The decision of the Supreme Court cannot be pro hac vice because, by mandate of the law, every decision of the Supreme Court forms part of the legal system of the Philippines
What is obiter dictum in the context of court opinions?
Obiter dictum is an opinion expressed by a court upon some question of law that is not necessary in the determination of the case before the court.
There is no specifically prescribed means to resolve a conflict of laws problem.
Who has the burden of proving a foreign law in a dispute or case?
The party who wants to have a foreign law applied to a dispute or case has the burden of proving the foreign law.
What are the three consecutive phases involved in the judicial resolution of conflicts problems?
The three consecutive phases involved in the judicial resolution of conflicts problems are jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition and enforcement of judgments.
Why are choice of law stipulations common in cross-border transactions?
Choice of law stipulations are very common in cross-border transactions because they help to ensure that contracts are interpreted and enforced in a consistent and predictable manner.
What is the relationship between choice of law and the principle of autonomy of contracts, and how does forum non conveniens function in legal proceedings?
Choice of law is an offshoot of the fundamental principle of autonomy of contracts while forum non conveniens is designed to frustrate illicit means for securing advantages and vexing litigants that would otherwise be possible if the venue of litigation were left entirely to the whim of either party.
What are the requisites under the doctrine of forum non conveniens that allow a Philippine court to assume jurisdiction over a conflict-of-laws case?
Under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, the Philippine court in a conflict-of-laws case may assume jurisdiction over a case if it chooses to do so, provided the requisites are present. The requisites are
(i) the Philippine court is one to which the parties may conveniently resort to,
(ii) the Philippine court is in a position to make an intelligent decision as to the law and the facts, and
(iii) the Philippine court has or is likely to have power to enforce its decision
What rule does a court apply under to determine which state law to apply to a dispute, based on the most substantial connection to the occurrence and the parties?
Under the state of the most significant relationship rule, to ascertain what state law to apply to a dispute, the court should determine which state has the most substantial connection to the occurrence and the parties.
Which laws exclusively govern real or immovable property, depending on its location?
Real or immovable property is exclusively subject to the laws of the country or state where it is located.
How does lex loci celebrationis differ from lex loci contractus?
Lex loci celebrationis differs from lex loci contractus. Lex loci celebrationis relates to the law of the place of the ceremony or the law of the place where a contract is made. Lex contractus or lex loci contractus means the law of the place where a contract is executed or to be performed.
Which law governs the extrinsic validity of a will, particularly in the initial stage of probate proceedings?
The extrinsic validity of the will, which is the preliminary issue in probate of wills, is governed by the law of the country where the will was executed and presented for probate.
When does unjust enrichment occur, according to principles of justice, equity, and good conscience?
There is unjust enrichment when a person unjustly retains a benefit to the loss of another, or when a person retains money or property of another against the fundamental principles of justice, equity, and good conscience.
What conditions must be met for an action of accion in rem verso, which applies the principle of unjust enrichment, to succeed?
Unjust enrichment has been applied to actions called accion in rem verso. In order that accion in rem verso may prosper, the following conditions must concur:
(i) the defendant has been enriched,
(ii) the plaintiff has suffered loss
(iii) the enrichment of the defendant is without just or legal ground
(iv) the plaintiff has no other action based on contract, quasi contract, crime, or quasi delict
In what circumstances is accion in rem verso considered available as a legal remedy?
accion in rem verso is considered merely an auxiliary action, available only when there is no other remedy on contract, quasi-contract, crime and quasi-delict
What obligation arises under the principle of solution indebiti when something is received mistakenly and there is no right to demand it?
Under solution indebiti, if something is received when there is no right to demand it, and it was unduly delivered through mistake, the obligation to return it arises.
What are the two conditions that must be met to establish the application of the quasi-contract of solutio indebiti, rooted in the principle against unjust enrichment?
The quasi-contract of solutio indebiti harks back to the ancient principle that no one shall enrich himself unjustly at the expense of another. To establish its application, two conditions must concur:
(i) a payment is made when there exists no binding relation between the payor who has no duty to pay, the person who received the payment and
(ii) the payment is made through mistake, and not through liberality or some other cause.
What does Article 19 of the Civil Code emphasize regarding the exercise of rights and duties, promoting fairness, giving each person their due, and upholding honesty and good faith?
The principle abuse of rights, as enshrined in Article 19 of the Civil Code, provides that every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith.
How does Article 19 of the Civil Code contribute to defining the standard of care in human relations, and under what conditions can it form the basis for an actionable tort when combined with Article 20 or Article 21?
Article 19 is the general rule which governs the conduct of human relations. By itself, it is not the basis of an actionable tort. Article 19 describes the degree of care required so that an actionable tort may arise when it is alleged together with Article 20 or Article 21.
What are the elements of abuse of rights?
Elements of abuse of rights:
(i) there is a legal right or duty
(ii) which is exercised in bad faith, and
(iii) for the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring another
Under what circumstances does a mere breach of a promise to marry not constitute an actionable wrong, according to legal principles, unless it significantly violates established good customs?
A mere breach of a promise to marry is not an actionable wrong, as long as it is not of such extent as would palpably and unjustifiably contradict good customs.
What does tortious interference refer to?
Tortious interference refers to a situation where a third person induces a party to renege on or violate his undertaking under a contract.
Article 26(1) providing that there is cause of action for “prying into the privacy of another’s residence” includes business offices where the public are excluded therefrom, and only certain individuals are allowed to enter.
Juridical capacity differs from capacity to act.
One need not acquire a civil personality first before he could die.
In what ways may a married woman legally use her surname?
Surname of married woman. A married woman may use:
(i) her maiden first name and surname and add her husband’s surname
(ii) her maiden first name and her husband’s surname
(iii) her husband’s full name, but prefixing a word indicating that she is his wife, such as “Mrs.”
Legitimate and legitimated children shall principally use the surname of the father
A father cannot compel the use of his surname by his illegitimate child even upon his recognition of filiation.
An illegitimate child, upon adoption by her natural father, can use the surname of her natural mother as her middle name.
The judge is incorrect in dismissing a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage based on Article 366 on the ground of lack of jurisdiction reasoning that marriages solemnized by the Church are governed by its Canon Law and not by the civil law.
When there is no bona fide intention of becoming a spouse to another, a marriage is void for want of consent even when marriage ceremonies have been conducted and, there, the parties declared their intent to enter into married life.
Judges must solemnize marriages only in his office or courtroom.
The marriage is void if the marriage contract states that no marriage license was exhibited to the solemnizing officer at the time of marriage, and the marriage does not fall under the circumstances where marriage license can be dispensed with.
No license shall be necessary for the marriage of a man and a woman who have lived together as husband and wife for at least five years and without any legal impediment to marry each other.
Absence of legal impediment must exist throughout the five-year period, and not only during marriage, for cohabiting persons to dispense with the marriage license.
A marriage formally valid in the place it is celebrated is valid in the Philippines.
Philippine laws do not provide for absolute divorce, and hence, the courts cannot grant the same.