civil appeals and evaluation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when do they need to be submitted by (how long)

A

up to 21 days after decision made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

is there an automatic right to appeal

A

no permission needs to be given
this is generally only given when it is likely the appeal will succeed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what must the appeal be based on (3)

A

error of law- the judge who made the decision interpreted the law incorrectly

 error of fact- either the judge didn’t understand the facts correctly, or the parties did not submit all of the facts correctly in the first trial

 procedural unfairness- some element of the trial procedure unfairly affected one of the parties. This may include that they were not given time to put their case forward, or that there is found to be some bias such as a connection with the judge and one of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does the first appeal hearing depend on

A

the “track” the case was allocated to, and where the initial case was heard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

if its a small claims track where would the original hearing be

A

Small Claims Track

County court/ district judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

if its a fast claims track where would the original hearing be

A

County court/ district judge

or county court/circuit judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

if its a multi track case where would the original hearing be

A

High court or county court/ high court judge or circuit judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

if its a small track case where would the first hearing be

A

County court/circuit judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

if its a fast track case where would the first hearing be

A

County court/ circuit judge

High court/ high court judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

if its a multi track case where would the first hearing be

A

Court of appeal only if conditions are met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if needed, where is the second appeal held

A

court of appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what act is needed for the second appeal

A

Access to Justice Act 1999, s.55

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does this act mean

A

an appeal of a civil case to the court of appeal (civil division) is only allowed if permission is granted by the court of appeal

 permission will be granted of

 the case raises an important point of law

 or

 the court feels there is another compelling reason to allow the appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in what type of case does these rules apply to the first hearing

A

multi track

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

appeals to the supreme court

A

A final appeal to the Supreme Court (formerly House of Lords) will only be allowed in exception circumstances. It must be a case of public/national importance, and the Supreme Court must give their permission which is why they see around200 per year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

leapfrog procedure

A

some cases may be able to ‘leapfrog’ the court of appeal and go directly to the supreme court for the appeal hearing

 this would only be allowed in exceptional circumstances if

 issue is of national/public importance

 it’s an issue important enough to warrant allowing the leapfrog

 the court of appeal is bound by its own previous precedent and only the supreme court can overrule the precedent

15
Q

reforms of the civil courts

A

Lord Woolf Reforms 1999
Lord Briggs 2016
Intermediate Track 2023

16
Q

what did Lord Woolf Reforms 1999 do

A

 brought in 3 tracks in 1999

 gas ped to more cooperation and less days

 but still lengthy and still too expensive

17
Q

what did Lord Briggs 2016 do

A

Online courts introduced for claims up to £25000

18
Q

what did Intermediate Track 2023 do

A

Introduced in 2023 to speed up the process

19
Q

evaluation- positive points

A

fair
judge is a legal expert
enforceable
appeals process

20
Q

fair dev

A

rules pf precedent create consistency between cases

This ultimately makes the outcome fair, judges are neutral and not biased

21
Q

fair extra

A

Alternatives to court (e.g arbitration) do not follow these same rules so court is best

22
Q

judge is legal expert dev

A

judges are legally trained and experienced. Leads to correct legal outcomes

23
Q

judge is legal expert extra

A

Especially in specialty divisions of the high court

24
Q

enforceable dev

A

decisions of the court are legally binding. Parties have to stick to them or face consequences

25
Q

enforceable extra

A

Alternatives to court (e.g mediation) don’t provide this certainty of outcomes

26
Q

appeals process dev

A

civil courts provides clear appeals process if there are errors or unfairness

27
Q

appeals process extra

A

civil courts provides clear appeals process if there are errors or unfairness

28
Q

evaluation- negative

A

too expensive
inequality
damages future relationships
lacks technological knowledge

29
Q

too expensive dev

A

Pay for the use of court and legal fees and potential compensation all add up

30
Q

too expensive extra

A

Losing party also has to pay the costs of the other party- if claimant loose alsi have to cover defendants and vise versa

31
Q

inequality dev

A

If one party has access to extra recources can become unfair (e.g wuality of lawyers)

32
Q

inequality extra

A

Ineuwualiry can be reason to appeal to ECtHR which is the european courts of human rights (but will parties bother?)

33
Q

damages future relationships dev

A

Court is adversiarial (battle) with winner and loser- damages relationships (e.g in business and family law)

34
Q

damages future relationships extra

A

Alternatives to court (e.g mediation) allow parties to communicate rather than battle

35
Q

lacks technological knowledge dev

A

Judges are legal experts but may not be ex[erts on area pf the case (e.g specific business topics)= wrong outcomes

36
Q

lacks technological knowledge extra

A

Altertaives to court (e.g arbitration use ecperts specialised in the topic