Civil and Criminal Court Structure Flashcards
This pack is focused on the civil and criminal courts in England and Wales, with focus on similarities and differences between both systems. The content is based on the BPP Study Notes provided online.
What types of law fall under the remit of ‘Civil Law’?
- Contract Law
- Tort Law
- Property Law
- Company Law
What could be said of the State’s interest in Civil Law as opposed criminal?
- The state has marginal interest in civil law; the individual is left to assert their rights. In a civil case, there will be a claimant, whereas a criminal court will have a prosecution
- The state is intently interested in criminal law, and plays an active role in the proceedings.
What semantic differences would exist between parties in civil and criminal cases?
- CIVIL: A claimant will sue a defendant with the intent of finding a remedy. At the end of the case, a judge will provide a judgement
- CRIMINAL: The prosecution prosecutes a defendant, finding them either guilty or not guilty through judge verdict.
How do the names of the parties change in a civil case which has been appealed?
The appealing party will become the appellant, whilst the opposing party will become the respondent.
What is part of public law, but does not carry the procedures of civil nor criminal law?
Judicial review - which is concerned with the regulation of the legal activities of public bodies - such as Ministers of the Crown, Local Authorities and Public Utilities.
What is the burden of proof?
One party has to prove their case. They have the burden of proof.
- In civil action, the claimant must prove their case
- In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt.
(Sometimes reversed, such as in libel cases. In murder cases, the defendant has the burden of proof to establish the defence of diminished responsibility)
What are the different standards of proof?
Civil - Balance of possibilities
Criminal - Beyond reasonable doubt
Detail, generally, the court system administered by HMCTS
Crown Court -> High Court -> Court of Appeal -> Supreme Court.
Small claims courts, County Courts, Magistrates’ Courts, Youth Courts
Provide some history behind the Supreme Court
Highest court, w/ appellate jurisdiction in England and Wales. Previously the highest court was the House of Lords, AKA Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. SC formed by Part III of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005; came into being 1 Oct 2009. This overrode authority diseased to HoL in the Appellate Jurisdiction Acts 1876 and 1888. Ambition - complete separation of senior judges and HoL. Increased transparency and independence.
What is the composition of the SC?
- 12 judges; President and Deputy President, others = ‘Justices of the Supreme Court’.
- President - Baroness Hale of Richmond, Deputy - Lord Reed.
How does the SC function?
- Case usually heard by 5 justices. More convened for important cases.
- Hears cases on laws of public importance, the UK in civil cases & Eng/Wales/N.Ire in criminal.
How does precedent function in the SC?
- Decisions binding on lower courts. Previously, bound to previous decisions (see London
Tramways Co. vs LCC [1898]), but changed in 1966 w/ Lord Gardiner, in the ‘Practice Statement’
This stated that the previous decisions were only binding when it seemed right to do so.- The doctrine of precedent is an ‘indispensable foundation’, but ‘too rigid adherence to
precedent may lead to injustice in a particular case and also unduly restrict the proper
development of the law.’ Seemed radical, but de facto judges were reluctant to depart from
precedent.
- The doctrine of precedent is an ‘indispensable foundation’, but ‘too rigid adherence to
Provide some background to the Court of Appeal
Formed by the Judicature Act 1873, split into civil and criminal in 1966. Hears all High Court civil cases, and Employment Appeal Tribunal cases.
What is the composition of the CA?
Head of civil division is the Master of the Rolls (currently Sir Terence Etherton), alongside the Lord and Lady Justices of Appeal. Typical cases attended to by three judges - MotR and two Lord Justices.
How does precedent work in the CA?
- Binds all lower courts, but bound by House of Lords and SC, and its own previous decisions. Exceptions are present in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co. [1944]:
- If there are two conflicting decisions, CoA may choose between,
- it need not follow if overruled by HoL, and may decline previous given per incuriam (‘without care’ - if in a previous case a glaring omission was made. Per incuriam applies in any court, but is rarely used.