Civ Pro - Overview

Question 1

JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON - Types of Personal Jurisdiction

Answer 1

1. In personam—forum has personal jurisdiction over defendant
2. In rem—forum has power to adjudicate rights of all persons to a particular item of property; defendant not personally bound
3. Quasi in rem—two types
   a. Quasi in rem type I—court adjudicates rights of parties in property based on property being in forum; close connection between case and property provides minimum contacts
   b. Quasi in rem type II—court attaches property to bring defendant into forum on unrelated claim; defendant must have minimum contacts with forum

Question 2

JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON - Statutory Limitations on Personal Jurisdiction

Answer 2

1. Federal court must analyze personal jurisdiction as if it were a court of the state in which it is located
   a. State law must authorize jurisdiction
   b. Most, if not all, states authorize jurisdiction over a defendant who:
   1) Is present in forum state and personally served with process therein;
   2) Is domiciled in forum state;
   3) Conducts systematic and continuous business in the state such that the defendant is “essentially at home” therein;
   4) Consents to jurisdiction; or
   5) Commits an act covered by the long arm statute

Question 3

JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON - Constitutional Limitations on Personal Jurisdiction

Answer 3

1. Traditional rule—physical power
2. Modern due process standard—contact and fairness
   a. Defendant must have such minimum contacts with the forum such that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over him is fair and reasonable
   1) Consider whether defendant purposefully availed himself of the benefits and protections of state law and whether he could have anticipated being brought into state court
   b. Notice also required
   1) Traditional methods of personal service satisfy notice requirements
   2) Requirement that agent notify defendant
   3) Requirement for cases involving multiple or unknown parties

Question 4

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IN FEDERAL COURTS - Diversity of Citizenship Jurisdiction

Answer 4

1. Complete diversity
   a. Every defendant must be of diverse state citizenship from each plaintiff—this is “complete diversity”
   b. Must have complete diversity when action commenced
   1) Interpleader exception
   c. Alienage jurisdiction—citizen of U.S. state and foreign citizen
   d. Questions of citizenship
   1) Individuals—domicile
   2) Corporations—every state/country where incorporated and one state/ country of principal place of business, which is the place from which the corporation’s high level officers direct and control its activities
   3) Unincorporated associations and limited liability companies—citizenships of its members
   4) Legal representatives—domicile of the represented person
   5) Class actions—domiciles of the named members
   6) Nonresident U.S. citizens—not a citizen of any state and not an alien
   e. Realignment of parties according to their true interest
   1) Shareholder derivative actions
   f. Supplemental jurisdiction
   1) Must be one claim with original jurisdiction
   2) Supplemental claim must arise from a common nucleus of operative fact as the original jurisdiction claim such that the claims should be tried together
   g. Subsequent addition of parties and claims
   1) Intervention of right—no supplemental jurisdiction
   2) Substitution of parties—citizenship of original party controls
   3) Impleader—supplemental jurisdiction as to claim of Defendant v. Third- Party Defendant; claim of Plaintiff v. Third-Party Defendant must have original jurisdiction in diversity case
   4) Cross-claims—supplemental jurisdiction
2. Jurisdictional amount in excess of $75,000
   a. Amount in controversy does not include interest and costs or counterclaims
   1) Attorneys’ fees and interest that are recoverable by statute or as part of claim are included
   b. Aggregation
   1) One plaintiff may aggregate claims against a single defendant
   2) One plaintiff may not aggregate separate claims against several defendants
   3) One plaintiff may sue several defendants on a joint liability claim if it exceeds $75,000
   4) Several plaintiffs may aggregate claims against one defendant if seeking to enforce single title or right
   c. Supplemental jurisdiction over claims by permissively joined plaintiffs not exceeding $75,000 possible in diversity cases
   d. Counterclaims
   1) Compulsory counterclaim may invoke supplemental jurisdiction
   2) Permissive counterclaim needs original jurisdiction
   3) Citizenship generally not an issue—if diversity exists between Plaintiff v. Defendant, it exists between Defendant v. Plaintiff
3. Erie doctrine and law applied in diversity cases—state substantive law, federal procedural law
4. Exceptions to diversity of citizenship doctrine—no probate, divorce, alimony, or child custody cases
5. Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act

Question 5

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IN FEDERAL COURTS - Federal Question Jurisdiction

Answer 5

1. Federal question must appear in complaint
2. Implied federal right of action possible
3. Supplemental jurisdiction
   a. Pendent claims—federal court has discretion to hear state law claim if it arises from a common nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim such that the claims should be tried together
   b. Pendent parties—must be common nucleus of operative fact
4. Specific statutory grants of exclusive federal jurisdiction

Question 6

VENUE - General Rules

Answer 6

1. Venue proper in federal district where any defendant resides (if all defendants reside in same state), where a substantial part of events or omissions occurred, or where a substantial part of property situated
2. Fallback provisions—if no district satisfies above, venue proper where any defendant is subject to court’s personal jurisdiction
3. Unlike subject matter jurisdiction, venue can be waived

Question 7

VENUE - Residence for Venue Purposes

Answer 7

1. Individuals—domicile
2. Business entities—where subject to court’s personal jurisdiction
3. Nonresidents—any judicial district

Question 8

VENUE - Transfer

Answer 8

1. Original venue proper—transfer for convenience to venue where case might have been brought or to venue to which parties consent
2. Original venue improper—transfer to venue where case could have been brought to correct error
   a. Dismissal if transfer not available or if some extraordinary circumstance exists

Question 9

VENUE - Law Applicable on Transfer

Answer 9

1. Original venue proper—A transfer solely on convenience grounds carries the law of the transferor court (including choice of law) to the transferee court unless the transfer was ordered to enforce a forum selection clause
2. Original venue improper—Law of transferee court applies

Question 10

REMOVAL JURISDICTION - Requirements

Answer 10

1. Original jurisdiction
   a. Diversity jurisdiction
   1) Dismissal of nondiverse party allows removal
   2) Case cannot be removed based solely on diversity if any defendant is a citizen of the forum state
   3) Case cannot be removed based solely on diversity more than one year after case was filed unless defendant can show plaintiff acted in bad faith to prevent removal
   b. Federal question jurisdiction
   1) Having a federal defense is insufficient
   2) Entire case is removed
   3) State law claims may be severed and remanded to state court
2. State court need not have had jurisdiction
3. Only defendants may remove
4. Venue—federal district where state action was filed

Question 11

REMOVAL JURISDICTION - Procedure for Removal

Answer 11

1. Time—30 days
   a. Generally starts to run after formal service of complaint
   b. If later pleading, motion, etc., is filed that shows case is now removable, period begins to run on service of that pleading, motion, etc.
2. Remand to state court if no federal subject matter jurisdiction

Question 12

Conflict of Jurisdiction Between State and Federal Courts - Injunctions Against State Court Proceedings

Answer 12

1. Federal court generally may not enjoin pending state proceedings
2. Threatened state criminal proceedings—to prevent clear and imminent harm that cannot be remedied with a criminal appeal

Question 13

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - Service of Process

Answer 13

1. Personal service, abode service, service on agent; also state rules and waiver of service (by mail)
2. Parties served outside of state or in foreign country
3. Immunity from process for parties, witnesses, attorneys in another action, or fraud or deceit

Question 14

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - Interlocutory Injunctions—Maintain Status Quo Until Trial

Answer 14

1. Preliminary injunctions—require notice
2. Substantive requirements—irreparable harm, harm to party seeking injunction outweighs harm to party to be bound, likelihood of success on the merits, public interest factors
3. Temporary restraining orders—necessary to prevent irreparable injury

Question 15

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - Pleadings

Answer 15

1. Complaint—notice of plaintiff’s claim
2. Pre-answer motions
   a. Motion to dismiss for (i) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (ii) lack of personal jurisdiction; (iii) improper venue (transfer probably); (iv) insufficient process or service of process; (v) failure to state a claim; and (vi) failure to join a party
   b. Motion for more definite statement
   c. Motion to strike
3. Answer—specific or general denials by defendant
   a. Compulsory counterclaims—arises out of same transaction or occurrence; must be pleaded
   b. Permissive counterclaims—any other counterclaim
   c. Inconsistent claims or defenses allowed
4. Special pleading for, e.g., fraud, mistake, special damages; must be more detail
5. Reply by plaintiff generally not required
6. Amendment of pleading and supplemental pleadings
   a. Relates back to filing date of original complaint if it concerns same conduct, transaction, or occurrence
   b. If party is charged, relates back if, within period for service of process, new party (i) received notice of the action such that party will not be prejudiced; and (ii) knew or should have known that, but for plaintiff’s mistake concerning identity, new party would have been made a party originally
7. Rule 11
   a. Attorney certifies proper purpose upon presenting paper to court
   b. Sanctions—judge has discretion limited by deterrence factor

Question 16

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - Joinder

Answer 16

1. Compulsory joinder
   a. Court cannot accord complete relief without absentee
   b. Absentee has interest that will be impaired by lawsuit
   c. Parties are at substantial risk for multiple or inconsistent judgments without absentee
   d. If a., b., or c. is true, and absentee’s presence will not destroy subject matter jurisdiction or venue, and the court can obtain personal jurisdiction over absentee, he must be joined
   e. If absentee can’t be joined, court must consider whether to proceed without absentee, looking at:
   1) Prejudice to absentee and parties
   2) Whether judgment can be shaped to avoid prejudice
   3) Adequacy of judgment without absentee
   4) Whether another forum can hear entire case
2. Permissive joinder—arises out of same occurrence and transaction and common question of law or fact
3. Joinder of claims
   a. Class actions
   1) Requirements
   a) Numerous class so joinder of all is impracticable;
   b) Common questions of law or fact;
   c) Named parties’ interests are typical;
   d) Named parties will ensure fair and adequate representation of absent members; and
   e) Either (i) separate actions risk inconsistent results or harm absent members; (ii) injunctive or declaratory relief is appropriate; or (iii) common questions of law or fact predominate and class action is superior to other methods
   2) Effect of judgment—all members bound unless opt out
   3) Notice of pendency required in “common question” suit so members can opt out
   4) Jurisdiction—for diversity, named parties control whether diversity and amount in controversy are satisfied
   5) Notice of settlement must be given to class members so they can object at “fairness hearing”
   6) Court must approve dismissal or settlement after “fairness hearing”; if class action based on common question of law or fact, court may refuse settlement unless members are given second chance to opt out
   b. Class Action Fairness Act
   1) Federal jurisdiction if:
   a) Any member of the plaintiff class is of diverse state citizenship from any defendant
   b) Aggregated amount in controversy exceeds $5 million
   c) 100 members to the class
   2) Local considerations may defeat jurisdiction
   c. Shareholder derivative suits
   1) Must have been a shareholder at time of transaction (or received shares by operation of law); not collusive effort to confer jurisdiction; made demand on directors if required
   2) Jurisdictional amount—consider corporation’s damages
   3) Venue—where corporation could have sued the same defendants
   d. Interpleader
   1) To avoid double liability
   2) Mnemonic: Rule 22 interpleader must follow the regular rules; statutory interpleader has special, simple standards
4. Intervention
   a. As of right—intervenor has an interest in property or transaction that is subject of the action and action may adversely affect interest and current parties do not adequately represent that interest
   b. Permissive—intervenor’s action has common question of law or fact
   c. No supplemental jurisdiction in federal court
5. Impleader—generally to bring in nonparty to get indemnity or contribution
   a. Supplemental jurisdiction over claim by defendant/third-party plaintiff against third-party defendant, but no supplemental jurisdiction over claim by original plaintiff against third-party defendant
6. Cross-claims—co-partners may sue each other for claims arising out of same trans- action or occurrence
   a. Supplemental jurisdiction available

Question 17

DUTY OF DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY - Disclosure Requirements

Answer 17

1. Types of disclosure required without discovery request
   a. Initial disclosures—generally disclosure of witnesses who support claims or defenses and materials that support claims or defenses
   b. Disclosure of expert testimony—testifying experts and their reports must be disclosed
   c. Pretrial disclosures—trial witnesses, depositions to be used at trial, exhibits, etc.
2. Scope of disclosure and discovery—generally any relevant nonprivileged matter that is proportional to the needs of the case
   a. Trial preparation materials—only if substantial need and to avoid undue hardship
   b. Experts
   1) Testifying experts—may depose
   2) Consulting experts—only if exceptional circumstances
   c. Protective orders may limit or end discovery if abused
3. Supplementation of disclosures and discovery response required if learn information given is materially incomplete or incorrect

Question 18

DUTY OF DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY - Types of Discovery upon Request

Answer 18

1. Pre-action depositions to perpetuate testimony
2. Oral depositions
   a. Notice of deposition compels appearance of parties
   b. Nonparties must be subpoenaed
3. Written depositions—questions to deponent submitted in writing
4. Interrogatories to parties—written questions to parties
5. Production of physical material—nonparties need to be subpoenaed
6. Request for admissions as to truth or genuineness of any matter or document

Question 19

DUTY OF DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY - Enforcing Disclosure and Discovery

Answer 19

1. Motion to compel disclosure
   a. Must certify good faith attempt to resolve dispute with opponent
2. Failure to comply with court order
   a. Sanctions
   b. No sanctions if substantially justified or unjust
3. Failure to disclose or supplement
   a. No use of material unless substantially justified or harmless
   b. Sanctions
4. Failure to admit
   a. Pay expenses for proving matter unless generally some good reason for not admitting
5. Failure to attend own deposition, serve answers to interrogatories, respond to request for inspection
   a. Must certify good faith attempt to resolve dispute with opponent
   b. Sanctions
   c. Must seek order of protection to avoid sanctions if request objectionable

Question 20

DUTY OF DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY - Use of Depositions at Trial or Hearing

Answer 20

Subject to the rules of evidence, depositions can be used:

1. To impeach the witness
2. For dead, unavailable, or absent witness
3. For any purpose if deponent is the adverse party

Question 21

DUTY OF DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY - Pretrial Conferences

Answer 21

1. Rule 26(f) conference of parties—planning for discovery
2. Rule 16(b) scheduling conference
3. Sanctions for failure to attend, obey an order, etc.

Question 22

TRIAL - Alternative Dispute Resolution

Answer 22

1. Contractual arbitration—written agreement to arbitrate
2. Judicial arbitration—voluntary arbitration under auspices of court
3. Mediation—use of neutral person to facilitate voluntary settlement between the parties

Question 23

TRIAL - Trial

Answer 23

1. Jury trial problems
   a. Right to jury trial—7th Amendment
   b. Jury size—at least six, no more than 12 jurors
   c. Jury instructions—objections must be made before jury retires
   d. Jury verdicts—general (for plaintiff or defendant and amount of damages) or specific (jury makes findings on material issues of fact)
2. Involuntary dismissal—with prejudice
3. Voluntary dismissal—by plaintiff, with or without leave of court
4. Summary judgment—if no genuine dispute of material fact, party entitled to judgment as a matter of law (no trial necessary)
5. Judgment as a matter of law (directed verdict)
   a. Evidence viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party
   b. Witness credibility is not considered
   c. Standard—evidence is such that a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient basis to find for the party on that issue
6. Renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (a.k.a. JNOV)
   a. Same standards as above
7. Motion for new trial—some error occurred at trial (e.g., juror misconduct)
   a. If made with renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and renewed motion is granted, judge must rule hypothetically on new trial motion
8. Party waives “sufficiency of the evidence” argument on appeal if he fails to move for a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial

Question 24

POST-TRIAL MOTIONS AND APPEALS - Attack on the Judgment at the Trial Court Level

Answer 24

1. Relief from judgment or order is given for:
   a. Clerical mistakes
   b. Other grounds for relief from judgment
2. Independent action in equity to set aside the judgment

Question 25

POST-TRIAL MOTIONS AND APPEALS - Final Judgment and Appellate Review

Answer 25

1. Judgment
   a. Appropriate relief that may be given
   b. Final decision on merits may sometimes be valid despite lack of subject matter jurisdiction
2. Time for appeals—generally 30 days
3. Reviewable order—final orders reviewable on appeal
   a. Interlocutory orders as of right—reviewable
   b. Interlocutory Appeals Act—review discretionary
   c. Collateral order rule—reviewable
   d. Orders may be made appealable (or nonappealable) by writ
   e. Certification of class action—can be appealed within 14 days of order
4. Stay pending appeal may be granted
5. Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear federal appellate cases (certiorari or certifi- cation) and state supreme court cases (by certiorari) where federal issue

Question 26

CLAIM AND ISSUE PRECLUSION - Effects of Judgment on Future Cases

Answer 26

1. Claim preclusion (res judicata)—a final judgment on the merits bars claimant from asserting same claim in later action
2. Issue preclusion (collateral estoppel)—a judgment binds parties (or their privies) in subsequent actions between them as to issues actually litigated and essential to judgment in first action

Question 27

CLAIM AND ISSUE PRECLUSION - Who Is Bound by Judgment?

Answer 27

1. Parties and their privies are bound
2. Mutuality rules
   a. Traditionally, if a nonparty was not bound by a judgment, he could not use issue preclusion against one who was bound by the judgment
   b. Some states (and federal courts) have relaxed mutuality rule when issue preclusion is used defensively
   c. Some states (and federal courts) employ a four-part test to determine if issue preclusion can be used offensively—if all of the following are answered affirmatively, issue preclusion can be used offensively
   1) Are the issues identical?
   2) Is there a final judgment on the merits?
   3) Did the party against whom the judgment is to be used have a fair opportunity to be heard?
   4) Is it not unfair or inequitable to apply issue preclusion?

Question 28

Review: points to hit for essay about discovery/privilege

Answer 28

• any matter not privileged that is relevant to claim or defense is discoverable
• includes people having relevant facts (contact info)
• Work product of lawyers and others in anticipation of litigation is discoverable only on showing substantial need and to avoid undue hardship in obtaining materials elsewhere. (touch on if lit is pending or threatened when made)
• costs of discovery (on party w/ allegedly relevant info) and the needs of the case will also be considered
• if something is close, suggest and in camera inspection pre-trial