CIV PRO MBE Flashcards
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Court is trying to get jrds over case
What are the two types of SMJ Cases?
Diversity & Federal Question
SMJ - Diversity (2) Requirements
(1) Case must be over 75k
(2) Complete diversity of citizenship
SMJ Diversity 75k Rules
Can add in other claims against single defendant to get to 75k
Can add additional claims that aren’t up to 75k if first claim is 75k
Multiple P’s
- If one p has a claim over 75k the other p’s can get in too even if claims are lower
- If none of you have claims up to 75k cannot combine to get in
Class actions
- As long as one member of the class has a clim over 75k then all other members can get in
Complete Diversity of Citizenship
NO P AND D CAN RESIDE IN THE SAME STATE
Domiciled:
- where you are present + have an intent to stay
Foreign Country:
- Citizen state A vs foreign country - COUNTS AS DIVERSITY
- Two foreign citizens = NOT DIVERSITY
Corporation:
- Citizen of any state they are incorporated and/or PPB
Intentional joining:
- cannot join a party just to get diversity
Federal Question
P’s claim must be about a federal law/federal issue
Well-pleaded complaint Rule:
- Must be obvious that the issue is federal!!
If federal issue is a defense = no federal issue!!!!!
Federal question cases:
- IP, marintine, and admiralty
Supplemental Jrds
Court adds case or parties to a current case that already has SMJ
Where is Supplemental Jrds allowed?
New case or party
Federal Question:
- Derives from common nucleus affect
- Same t/o
-Came car accident, same thing
Diversity:
- Derives from common nucleus affect
- New case or party cannot destroy diversity of citizenship
TYPICALLY ONLY D IS THE ONE ADDING IN NOT THE P - COURT HAS DISCRETION
Cases Allowed/ Not Allowed Supplemental Jrds
Allowed:
- Compulsory counterclaim
- Joinder in compulsory counterclaim
- Cross claim
- Impleader of 3rd party defendants
Not allowed:
- Original plaintiff v 3 party D
- Compulsory joinder
- Joinder of defendants
- Intervention
Personal Jrds (PJ)
getting an individual in court
How can you get PJ?
(1) Served with complaint while present in state
- if forced there -> doesn’t
count (fraud or diff lawsuit)
(2) Domiciled in State
(3) Consented to be sued there (long arm)
PJ - Out of State Defendant (long arm statue)
- Are there minimum contacts with the forum?
- You visit multiple times a year,
have family there, business
relationships there
- Does the person reasonably
anticipate that they may litigate
there? - Cannot violate DP
Corps: Minimum contacts
- Did the business purposely avail itself to the state?
- Are there activities systematic and continuous
- Reps, offices, sales people in
that state
In Rem Jrds
Trying to get jrds over property or object
Quasi In Rem Jrds
Going after property of someone to satisfy a judgment
Service of Process (where location)
- Only in limits of state where district courts sit OR
- Anywhere else that state law (long arm statue) allows
Exception:
- 100 mile bulge rule
- Out of state service is allowed
against out-of-staters anywhere
within 100 miles of courthouse
where suit is pending but ONLY
APPLIES TO 3P DEFENDANTS
OR INDISPENSABLE
Service of Process (how)
Personal Service
- handed directly to you
- someone over 18 who is a NON PARTY!!
At Home:
- Can leave complaint at house as long as it is left with someone of suitable age (someone likely to give it to you)
First Class Mail:
- Returns an acknowledgment or waiver form
Authorized Agent:
Whatever State law allows:
Out of Staters:
- Registered mail
- Newspaper if no other
reasonable way
Public Official:
Corporation:
- Officer or designated agent of company
- Anyone of high placement
Removal - DEFENDANT
ONLY D CAN REMOVE!!!!!
A case is in state court -> but wants to be removed to fed court
Exception:
-If it says its in a state agency or
other state entity -> can’t be
removed
Removal is ok if the case could have gone to federal court in the first place
All d’s have to be on notice of removal and agree
Remand - PLAINTIFF
P tried to get the case back to state court b/c removal was improper
Must file to remand within 30 days of the removal notice
D has the burden to show that removal was proper
Removal - Notice Of Removal
Must file notice w/the court within 30 days of getting served with original complaint
Diversity:
One year rule: cannot be removed if one year has passed since start of the lawsuit
D cannot remove to a state where he/she is a citizen
Multiple claims
If one claim is removable -> the entire case can be removed
Venue
(1) district where any D resides
(2) any district where substantial
parts of the event took place
IF THERE IS NO OTHER DISTRICT THAT IS PROPER:
(3) wherever one person is reachable (where you have PJ over DEFENDANT)
Corporation:
- Where the PPB is OR
- Any district in state they are incorporated
Forum Non-Conveniens: Transferring Venue
If venue was proper in first place -> but someone wants case to be transferred to another district -> judge decides if it is convenient for the parties and in interest of justice
Law of original state will apply
If venue was not proper -> judge must dismiss case or if in the interest of justice -> may be transferred to any district where the case might have been originally brought
Not totally convenient -> both parties consent
Dismissal
If it is more convenient in another country -> case is dismissed
Complaint
- Filed with court with a summons
- Served to the other party
- when SOL begins
Elements:
- Short and plain statement for jrd
- Summary of facts (not legal theory)
- Demand for relief (damages)
- The complaint needs more specifics if
- Fraud
- Special damages
Answer
- Signed by lawyer
- Served within 21 days
- Can deny or admit anything in the complaint
- Whatever is not denied is admitted
- Any affirmative defenses must be pleaded in the answer
- Contributory neg
- SOF
- SOL
- Illegality
- Duress
Amending Pleading
- Can amend once as long as within 21 days of the original pleading
- Need permission of court if not within 21 days
Court allows if “justice so requires”
Relate Back
Want the amended pleading to revert back to OG date
- Changing a party
Allowed if:
- same conduct or t/o
- Notice within 90 days to new
party
- The new party knew or should’ve known that they would be sued but for a mistake in party ID
Rule 11
Lawyer is signing, submitting or filing a doc to the court
Promising that what they are submitting is true to best of their knowledge
Basically making sure lawyers aren’t submitting random shit
- Allegations warranted by existing law
- Evidentiary support
- No improper purpose
Counter Claim
A sues B & B sues A back
Compulsory counter claim
Same t/o
Court already has supplemental jrd
Permissive Counter Claim
Not same t/o
Needs it’s own jrd
Permissive Joinder
Multiple p’s can join together to sue someone
Come from same t/o
Question of law or fact is common
Compulsory Joinder
Party must join b/c would be unfair to litigate without them
Necessary Parties
Need to be joined b/c complete relief cannot occur
Leaving them out would impair their interest
If joining them destroys jrd = case may still PROCEED
Indispensable Parties
If you don’t join them would prejudice them
If joined them and destroys jrd = case is DISMISSED
Class Action Requirements
(1) size
- Must be so large that little claims would be impractical
(2) common question
- The issue must all of same law or fact
(3) typicality
- Claims have to be typical of the
other hundred thousands
(4) fair representation
- The reps have to be fair to all members
if request for a CA is denied -> can be appealed & others can move fwrd w/o you
3 Types of Class Actions
(1) B1
- If it is not a class action it would impair interest of members
(2) B2
- Injunctive relief
(3) Common Question (most popular)
- tort/injury
B1 & B2
MAY NOT OPT OUT
NO NOTICE REQUIRED (court discretion)
B3
MAY OPT OUT
NOTICE REQUIRED TO ALL MEMBERS
Mail is ok to reach out
Diversity Class Action
Citizenship of representative that counts!!!!
Only one member has to have a claim over 75k -> everyone else can join in under the 75k
Exception: if cumulative claims is over 5 mill -> don’t need to meet the 75k
Intervension
Someone who is not part of the original suit -> wants to come in on their own
As of right:
- Do not need court permission if
have an interest in prop or.
transaction
- impair them if not included
Permissive:
- Common question of law or fact
- Court permission is required
Impleader
D believes a 3P owes part or all of the claim
Ex: John sues Isa - Isa thinks someone owes money too
- Contribution
- Indemnification