Civ Pro II Flashcards
McGee v International Insurance
Nexus (Quality and Nature)
The plaintiffs Estate sued for coverage of a life insurance policy. The defendant claimed they had no contacts with the forum. The court found that they had PJ over defendant b/c the claim arose directly from their one contact of having the plaintiff as a policyholder. The closer to the claim the contacts are, the less contacts needed. One contact can be enough
Section 1367
Supplemental JDX
International Shoe
Doing Business
Traveling salesmen in the forum and living in the forum. The court found PJ b/c the company was doing business in the forum by employing salesman within the state
Fair and Adequate Protection
Protect the interest of the class
Driven by the class
Resources
Time
How to Prove Joinder Rules other than 19
Which rule
Independent basis?
Supp: Is there a common nucleus of operative fact
Rule 13b
Permissive Counterclaim
A pleading may State a counterclaim against an opposing party any claim that is not compulsory
Rule 13g
Crossclaim
A pleading may State a crossclaim by one party against a co party if arises out of the same transaction
Rule 14
Third Party Impleader
A defendant may bring a third Party to indemnify or contribute (must be diverse) when another party is liable for the claim
Within 14 days
Allows impleaders to counterclaim against defendant and downslope claims against plaintiff
Typicality
Represents claims or defenses typical of the class
Rule 4
Summons
Must deliver to defendant within 90 days at the usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there
Waiving summons
In writing
Inform the defendant
Agent, manager, etc
Sent first class
Avoid waiver expenses
With good cause Not including: Groundless Venue JDX
4 ways to get SMJ
Diversity of Citizenship
Alienage
Exclusive
Fed Question
Commonality
Similar cause of action
Similar common question of law or fact
Similar evidence will be used
Rule 22 Plaintiff
Interpleader
Persons with claims that may expose party to double or multiple liability may be joined as a defendant and required even if the claims lack a common origin or the plaintiff denies liability in whole or part
Rule 22 Defendant
A defendant exposed to similar liability may seek interpleader through counterclaim or crossclaim
Rule 24 Required
Intervention
The court must permit anyone to intervene who is given an unconditional right by statute or claims an interest relating to property or transaction
If allowed, does not destroy diversity
Rule 24 Permissive
Intervention
The court may permit anyone to intervene who is given a conditional right by statute or has a claim or defense that shares with the main action of law and fact
Complete Diversity
All plaintiffs are of diverse citizenship from all defendants
Ind: Domicile
Corp: Incorp and PBB
Indispensable
Extent to which judgment prejudicial
Avoid or lessen prejudice
Judgment Adequate
Other avenue of relief
Feasible to Join
Does it destroy diversity
Rule 18
Joinder of Claims
A party may join as many claims as it has against the opposing party
Right to Jury Trial
What would the chancery in 1791 have done?
Equity: judge
Law: jury
Both: jury
Steps to Erie Doctrine
Is there a diversity case Conflict between state and fed law Procedural or substantive Outcome determinative Overriding fed interest
Rule 38
Demand Jury Trial
Must demand within 14 days from answer
WWV v Woodson
Stream of Commerce and Foreseeability
Defendant purchased car in NY. While driving through OK, a rear end caused a fire and injury. The plaintiff did not sale nor perform services in OK and had no contacts with the forum. They could not contemplate that their products stream of commerce included OK nor could they foresee being haled into court there b/c they only did business in NY and NJ
Calder v Jones
Effects Test
Defendants career centered in the forum and the article written was drawn from forum sources and the harm was suffered in the forum. The court found PJ by way of the effects Test
Contractual Consent
If the defendant agreed in advance through k to be covered by the JDX
General Company Experts
Treated as regular witnesses
All discoverable
Strawbridge v Curtiss
Complete Diversity Rule
Property in Forum
Shaffer
Rule 23
Class Actions