civ pro flashcards
Personal jurisdiction requires that the defendant be _____ to the forum state’s jurisdiction, and that the defendant be ______.
amenable; served with proper notice
Amenability to personal jurisdiction is governed by the ______, subject to the limits of the ______ of the United States Constitution
forum state’s law; due process clause
Pennoyer v. Neff described three bases for state jurisdiction over persons and things. They are
_____: jurisdiction over the person
_____: jurisdiction over interests in property
_____: jurisdiction over seized property, where plaintiff’s claim is unrelated to the seized property
In personam
in rem
quasi in rem
Pennoyer based its jurisdictional formula on ____ over persons and property within its borders
state power
Under Pennoyer’s in personam jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor
—would be _____ in all states
—for the ____ of damages
—may be ____ until fully collected
binding; full amount; enforced repeatedly
Under Pennoyer’s in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in favor of plaintiff
—affects ____ in a res (both ____ and ____ to the lawsuit)
—does not result in a _____
— does not require ____ outside the forum
everyone’s interests; parties and non parties
money judgment
enforcement
Under Pennoyer’s quasi in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor: —entitles plaintiff to the \_\_\_\_ —is not a \_\_\_\_\_ —is not \_\_\_\_ —may not be \_\_\_\_\_ —may not be \_\_\_\_\_
property attached for jurisdiction
personal judgment
enforceable against any other property
enforced more than once
enforced outside the forum
Another type of jurisdiction not discussed in Pennoyer is ____, which involves the state’s authority to adjudicate such matters as divorce, adoption, citizenship and mental competence.
status
____ altered Pennoyer’s rule for personal jurisdiction, replacing the concept of ____ with the new standards of ___ and ___ provided by the “minimum contacts test.”
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
state power
reasonableness
fairness
The current test for amenability, following International Shoe and other cases, does not require the minimum contacts test if the defendant satisfies any one of the four “traditional” bases for in personam jurisdiction. Those bases are: \_\_\_\_\_ in the forum state \_\_\_\_\_\_ to jurisdiction \_\_\_\_\_ of objection to jurisdiction \_\_\_\_\_ in the forum when served
Residence
Consent
Waiver
Physical Presence
Consent to jurisdiction has two forms, ____ consent and ____ consent. ______ are an example of express consent, and ____are an example of implied consent.
express
implied
forum selection clause
non-resident motorist statutes
If none of the traditional bases are present, a state may only exercise in personam jurisdiction over defendants who have minimum contacts with the state. The two categories of minimum contacts are ____ and _____.
specific jurisdiction
general jurisdiction
______ relates to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state. _____ is where the lawsuit is unrelated to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state.
specific jurisdiction
general jurisdiction
Specific jurisdiction has four contacts tests, which are that the defendant
a. ______ itself of the benefits and protections of forum law;
b. should have ____ that its activity would subject it to jurisdiction in the forum state;
c. could _____ being haled into court in the forum state;
d. placed its product in the _____ and could foresee that it would be used in the forum state.
purposely availed
foreseen
reasonably anticipate
stream of commerce
General jurisdiction has one contact test, which is that it has_____ with the forum state.
continuous and systematic contacts
If the defendant has no contacts with the forum (and does not meet one of the four traditional bases of jurisdiction), then there is ___ over that defendant. If, on the other hand, defendant does have specific or general contacts, then the court must consider the ______ test. This is a ____ test with five factors, which are:
—______
—_____ interest in convenient and effective relief
—_____
—the ____ in furthering fundamental social policies
– _____ in effective resolution of controversies
no personal jurisdiction
fair play and substantial justice test
balancing
- burden on the defendant
- plaintiff’s
- the forum state’s interest
- the shared interests of several states
- judicial system’s interest
The due process requirement for notice to defendant is stated in Mullane v. Central Hanover. Notice is constitutionally sufficient if it is “____, under all circumstances, to apprise___ parties of the pendency of the action, and afford them an _____ and _____.”
reasonably calculated
interested
opportunity to appear
present objections
An abbreviated version of the Mullane notice rule is that ____ requires ___ and an ____.
due process clause
notice
opportunity to be heard
Which rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure deals with initially notifying the defendant of the lawsuit?
Rule 4
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, the two primary methods for service of process on a competent adult are:
a. ____ to defendant;
b. leaving copies at ____ with a person of _____.
personal delivery
defendant’s residence; suitable age and discretion
In most cases, the federal method of service on defendants outside the district is by the ___ statute of the state in which the federal court sits.
long arm
The purposes of venue rules are:
(a) _____ to defendant
(b) ______ of caseload within the forum state
fairness
geographic allocation
The federal statute for general venue provisions is _____
28 USC 1391
The purpose of forum non conveniens is ____ based on fairness and convenience.
to move cases from one forum to another
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to adjudicate based on the ____ and in some cases, _____
type of case
dollar amount in controversy
Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over two types of cases:
federal question
diversity of citizenship
The statute dealing with general federal question jurisdiction is ___. It provides that federal courts have jurisdiction over any ____.
28 USC 1331
case or controversy arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
In addition to the general federal question provisions in 28 U.S.C. § 1331, there are specific statutes on federal question jurisdiction, including actions against (name three):
patents
civil rights
consuls
Diversity jurisdiction is covered by ___. That statute provides that federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over claims between ____, or between ____ and ____, where the amount in controversy _____.
28 U.S.C. § 1332 citizens of different states state citizens foreign citizens exceeds $75,000
Although the Constitution requires only ____ diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires ___ diversity. This means that all plaintiffs must have different citizenship than all defendants.
partial
complete
For diversity purposes, a corporation has two citizenships, which are:
a. _______
b. ________
state of incorporation
principal place of business
For diversity purposes, partnerships have the citizenship of _____
all the partners
The amount in controversy is determined by plaintiff’s ____.
good faith pleading
In achieving the amount in controversy, may Plaintiff aggregate (answer “yes” or “no”):
a. all of Plaintiff’s claims against one defendant?
b. alternate theories of recovery for the same wrong? c. claims of different plaintiffs?
d. claims against different defendants?
Yes
No
No
No
In some cases, a related claim that lacks diversity or federal question jurisdiction may be included. This is called _____.
supplemental jurisdiction
Federal courts traditionally abstain from ____, _____, and ____.
family law
probate
state criminal proceedings
If plaintiff has filed his action in state court, and jurisdiction is proper in federal court, defendant may remove the case to federal court. This is done by filing a ____ in federal court, attaching a copy of _____ and ____ to the state court and all parties.
Notice of Removal
all state court pleadings
giving notice
If there is a _____ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court no matter when the objection is made
jurisdictional
If there is a _______ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court if a ______
procedural
proper and timely objection is filed
State court subject matter jurisdiction is governed by
state law
In state courts, subject matter jurisdiction is designated by _____ and/or _____.
type of case
dollar amount
In Texas, state district courts have ____ over all claims of ___ or more in controversy.
general jurisdiction
$500
Federal courts have ___ jurisdiction over patent claims. Federal and state court share _____ jurisdiction over _____.
exclusive
concurrent
federal civil rights actions
A court has ____ jurisdiction if it is the required forum at the beginning of the case. A court has ____ jurisdiction if it may adjudicate a case only after it has been heard in a lower court.
original
appellate
A Texas state district court has ____ jurisdiction over any dispute involving $500 or more, and ___ jurisdiction over appeals from Texas state agency decisions.
original
appellate
A federal district (trial) court has _____ jurisdiction over appeals from federal administrative agency decisions.
appellate
The United States Supreme Court has ____ jurisdiction over disputes between states.
original
The Rules of Decision Act provides that “____, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as____ in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.”
the laws of the several states
rules of decision
_____ interpreted the Rules of Decision Act to require federal courts to apply the ____ in cases where state law applied.
Swift v. Tyson
general American common law
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins reversed Swift v. Tyson, holding that when state law applies in federal court, the federal court must apply _______.
the law of the state in which that federal court sits
_____ coined the “_____,” which provides that the ____ Doctrine mandates state law only where it affects substantive rights that are potentially outcome determinative.
Guaranty Trust v. York
outcome determinative test
Erie
____ modified the ____, holding that the court should ___ in the case to determine which interests were stronger. ___ further held that one factor of the balancing test is whether the state law in question is _____ outcome determinative. Thus, ___ gives more importance to state laws that absolutely change the outcome of the case.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge outcome determinative test balance state and federal interests Byrd absolutely or definitively Byrd
To determine the content of state law in federal court, the Erie Doctrine directs that the court look to ___ and ___. Persuasive (but not binding) authority is found in ___ and ____. Erie also allows courts to make an ___ as to state law.
state statutes decisions from the state's highest court lower state appellate courts federal court opinions on state law educated guess
The Rules Enabling Act (28 U.S.C. § 2072) provides the United States Supreme Court may enact the _____, provided that no rule may ____ any substantive right.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
abridge, enlarge, or modify
The most prominent Rules Enabling case is ____, which resolves the conflict between the Rules Enabling Act and the ____.
Hanna v. Plumer
Erie Doctrine
___ v. Plumer also provides the current version of the ___ Doctrine, holding that if there is no ____ on point, then apply the Byrd test subject to the _____.
Hanna
Erie
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
twin aims of Erie
Choice of law is the process by which courts determine which _____ law will be applied in a case.
state’s or nation’s